Literature DB >> 22244819

Postoperative information needs and communication barriers of esophageal cancer patients.

Inge Henselmans1, Marc Jacobs, Mark I van Berge Henegouwen, Hanneke C J M de Haes, Mirjam A G Sprangers, Ellen M A Smets.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Given the poor prognosis of esophageal cancer and the impact of surgery on health-related quality of life (HRQL), addressing patients' postoperative information needs is important. This study aimed to examine (1) the content and type of patients' information needs and (2) patient perceived facilitators and barriers to patient participation.
METHODS: Interviews were conducted with 20 purposefully selected esophageal cancer patients. Open and structured questions were alternated. The transcribed interviews were analysed inductively and deductively, using MAXqda.
RESULTS: Patients' post-operative information needs concerned HRQL, medical care and prognosis, covering several sub-domains. Different types of needs were identified, e.g., requests for information about cause, course and self-management. Barriers to patient participation mostly reflected beliefs and skills, and could be categorized into agenda and communication barriers. Facilitators of patient participation reflected physician, patient and interaction characteristics, companion support and pre-visit preparation. Many patients saw merit in pre-visit preparation interventions; few endorsed skill-building interventions.
CONCLUSION: This study listed the postoperative information needs of esophageal cancer patients. Moreover, it gained insight into patient-perceived barriers and facilitators of patient participation. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: The findings demonstrate what information physicians should have available and informs interventions to support patients in meeting their information needs.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22244819     DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.12.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Patient Educ Couns        ISSN: 0738-3991


  12 in total

1.  Anxiety is associated with unfulfilled information needs and pain at the informed consent consultation of spine surgery patients: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  Sabine Fischbeck; Katja Petrowski; Mirjam Renovanz; Rebecca Nesbigall; Julian Haaf; Florian Ringel
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-06-05       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  To treat or not to treat: who should decide?

Authors:  Hanneke W M van Laarhoven; Inge Henselmans; J Hanneke C de Haes
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2014-03-20

3.  Participation of chronic patients in medical consultations: patients' perceived efficacy, barriers and interest in support.

Authors:  Inge Henselmans; Monique Heijmans; Jany Rademakers; Sandra van Dulmen
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2014-05-12       Impact factor: 3.377

4.  Characterizing patient-oncologist communication in genomic tumor testing: The 21-gene recurrence score as an exemplar.

Authors:  Suzanne C O'Neill; Susan T Vadaparampil; Richard L Street; Tanina Foster Moore; Claudine Isaacs; Hyo S Han; Bianca Augusto; Jennifer Garcia; Katherine Lopez; Matilda Brilleman; Jinani Jayasekera; Susan Eggly
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2020-09-03

5.  Multiple approaches to enhancing cancer communication in the next decade: translating research into practice and policy.

Authors:  Claire C Conley; Amy K Otto; Glynnis A McDonnell; Kenneth P Tercyak
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 3.046

6.  Active patient participation in the development of an online intervention.

Authors:  Inge Renske van Bruinessen; Evelyn M van Weel-Baumgarten; Harm Wouter Snippe; Hans Gouw; Josée M Zijlstra; Sandra van Dulmen
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2014-11-06

7.  Cancer information needs according to cancer type: A content analysis of data from Japan's largest cancer information website.

Authors:  Tsuyoshi Okuhara; Hirono Ishikawa; Akiko Urakubo; Masayo Hayakawa; Chikako Yamaki; Tomoko Takayama; Takahiro Kiuchi
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2018-10-22

8.  Meta-analysis shows clinically relevant and long-lasting deterioration in health-related quality of life after esophageal cancer surgery.

Authors:  M Jacobs; R C Macefield; R G Elbers; K Sitnikova; I J Korfage; E M A Smets; I Henselmans; M I van Berge Henegouwen; J C J M de Haes; J M Blazeby; M A G Sprangers
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  Development and Feasibility of a Mobile Health-Supported Comprehensive Intervention Model (CIMmH) for Improving the Quality of Life of Patients With Esophageal Cancer After Esophagectomy: Prospective, Single-Arm, Nonrandomized Pilot Study.

Authors:  Chao Cheng; Rainbow Tin Hung Ho; Yan Guo; Mengting Zhu; Weixiong Yang; Yiran Li; Zhenguo Liu; Shuyu Zhuo; Qi Liang; Zhenghong Chen; Yu Zeng; Jiali Yang; Zhanfei Zhang; Xu Zhang; Aliza Monroe-Wise; Sai-Ching Yeung
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2020-08-18       Impact factor: 5.428

10.  Supportive Care Needs and Health-Related Quality of Life of Esophageal Cancer Survivors.

Authors:  Eunju Choi; Soo Hyun Kim; Young Whee Lee; Hwasoon Kim; Young Mog Shim; Genehee Lee; Deborah L Volker
Journal:  Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs       Date:  2021-01-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.