OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated how well women from diverse race/ethnic groups were able to take a quantitative cancer risk statistic verbally provided to them and report it in a visual format. METHODS: Cross-sectional survey was administered in English, Spanish or Chinese, to women aged 50-80 (n=1160), recruited from primary care practices. The survey contained breast, colorectal or cervical cancer questions regarding screening and prevention. Women were told cancer-specific lifetime risk then shown a visual display of risk and asked to indicate the specific lifetime risk. Correct indication of risk was the main outcome. RESULTS: Correct responses on icon arrays were 46% for breast, 55% for colon, and 44% for cervical; only 25% correctly responded to a magnifying glass graphic. Compared to Whites, African American and Latina women were significantly less likely to use the icon arrays correctly. Higher education and higher numeracy were associated with correct responses. Lower education was associated with lower numeracy. CONCLUSIONS: Race/ethnic differences were associated with women's ability to take a quantitative cancer risk statistic verbally provided to them and report it in a visual format. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Systematically considering the complexity of intersecting factors such as race/ethnicity, educational level, poverty, and numeracy in most health communications is needed.
OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated how well women from diverse race/ethnic groups were able to take a quantitative cancer risk statistic verbally provided to them and report it in a visual format. METHODS: Cross-sectional survey was administered in English, Spanish or Chinese, to women aged 50-80 (n=1160), recruited from primary care practices. The survey contained breast, colorectal or cervical cancer questions regarding screening and prevention. Women were told cancer-specific lifetime risk then shown a visual display of risk and asked to indicate the specific lifetime risk. Correct indication of risk was the main outcome. RESULTS: Correct responses on icon arrays were 46% for breast, 55% for colon, and 44% for cervical; only 25% correctly responded to a magnifying glass graphic. Compared to Whites, African American and Latina women were significantly less likely to use the icon arrays correctly. Higher education and higher numeracy were associated with correct responses. Lower education was associated with lower numeracy. CONCLUSIONS: Race/ethnic differences were associated with women's ability to take a quantitative cancer risk statistic verbally provided to them and report it in a visual format. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Systematically considering the complexity of intersecting factors such as race/ethnicity, educational level, poverty, and numeracy in most health communications is needed.
Authors: Sue E Kim; Eliseo J Pérez-Stable; Sabrina Wong; Steve Gregorich; George F Sawaya; Judith M E Walsh; Celia P Kaplan Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2008-04-14
Authors: Alison J Huang; Eliseo J Pérez-Stable; Sue E Kim; Sabrina T Wong; Celia P Kaplan; Judith M E Walsh; A Yuri Iwaoka-Scott; George F Sawaya Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2008-05-28 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: George F Sawaya; A Yuri Iwaoka-Scott; Sue Kim; Sabrina T Wong; Alison J Huang; A Eugene Washington; Eliseo J Pérez-Stable Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2008-10-30 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Celia Patricia Kaplan; Sue E Kim; Sabrina T Wong; George F Sawaya; Judith M E Walsh; Eliseo J Pérez-Stable Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2012-05 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Kah Poh Loh; Mazie Tsang; Thomas W LeBlanc; Anthony Back; Paul R Duberstein; Supriya Gupta Mohile; Ronald M Epstein; Heidi D Klepin; Michael W Becker; Areej El-Jawahri; Stephanie J Lee Journal: Blood Adv Date: 2020-11-10
Authors: Judith M E Walsh; Sue E Kim; George Sawaya; Celia P Kaplan; Sabrina T Wong; Steve E Gregorich; Eliseo J Pérez-Stable Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2012-09-12 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Brian J Zikmund-Fisher; Holly O Witteman; Mark Dickson; Andrea Fuhrel-Forbis; Valerie C Kahn; Nicole L Exe; Melissa Valerio; Lisa G Holtzman; Laura D Scherer; Angela Fagerlin Journal: Med Decis Making Date: 2013-11-18 Impact factor: 2.583