Literature DB >> 22968796

Colorectal cancer screening: what do women from diverse ethnic groups want?

Judith M E Walsh1, Sue E Kim, George Sawaya, Celia P Kaplan, Sabrina T Wong, Steve E Gregorich, Eliseo J Pérez-Stable.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Little is known about factors associated with willingness to undergo colorectal cancer (CRC) screening for personal or public health benefit among women from diverse race/ethnic groups.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate factors associated with willingness to undergo CRC screening for personal and public health benefit among women from diverse race/ethnic groups.
METHODS: We interviewed women aged 50 to 80 from four racial/ethnic groups from primary care clinics in 2003-2005. We asked about demographics, CRC screening knowledge and history, perceived risk of colon cancer, and about the outcomes of intention to be screened for personal benefit and for public health benefit.
RESULTS: Of the 492 women who completed the interview, 32 % were White, 16 % were African American, 21 % were Latina and 32 % were Asian. Up-to-date screening was reported by 77 % of women, with similar numbers obtaining fecal occult blood test (FOBT) within 2 years or colonoscopy within 10 years. The majority of women were "likely or very likely" to get FOBT or colonoscopy after learning the benefits and risks. Multivariate models showed that compared to Whites, fewer Asians would undergo colonoscopy (OR = 0.28; 95 % CI: 0.12, 0.63), while more Latinas would undergo colonoscopy (OR = 6.14; 95 % CI: 1.77, 21.34) and obtain regular CRC screening (OR = 4.47; 95 % CI: 1.66, 12.04). The majority would obtain CRC screening even if they would not personally benefit; those who perceived themselves to be at higher than average cancer risk were more likely to participate in CRC screening for public health benefit (OR = 2.32; 95 % CI: 1.32, 4.09).
CONCLUSIONS: The majority of women are willing to undergo screening for personal benefit. Asians were less likely, and Latinas more likely, to accept colonoscopy. Most are also willing to undergo screening for public health benefit. Self-perceived risk of CRC was the most consistent predictor of willingness and intention to be screened for either personal or public health benefit.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22968796      PMCID: PMC3614137          DOI: 10.1007/s11606-012-2210-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  24 in total

1.  What does it mean to understand a risk? Evaluating risk comprehension.

Authors:  N D Weinstein
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  1999

2.  The use of cognitive testing to develop and evaluate CAHPS 1.0 core survey items. Consumer Assessment of Health Plans Study.

Authors:  L D Harris-Kojetin; F J Fowler; J A Brown; J A Schnaier; S F Sweeny
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  Adherence to colorectal cancer screening in an HMO population.

Authors:  R E Myers; B J Trock; C Lerman; T Wolf; E Ross; P F Engstrom
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 4.018

4.  Barriers to colorectal cancer screening in Latino and Vietnamese Americans. Compared with non-Latino white Americans.

Authors:  Judith M E Walsh; Celia P Kaplan; Bang Nguyen; Ginny Gildengorin; Stephen J McPhee; Eliseo J Pérez-Stable
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Adherence to continuous screening for colorectal neoplasia.

Authors:  R E Myers; A M Balshem; T A Wolf; E A Ross; L Millner
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  Women's misconceptions about cancer screening: implications for informed decision-making.

Authors:  Thomas D Denberg; Sabrina Wong; Angela Beattie
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2005-06

7.  Adherence to colorectal cancer screening: a randomized clinical trial of competing strategies.

Authors:  John M Inadomi; Sandeep Vijan; Nancy K Janz; Angela Fagerlin; Jennifer P Thomas; Yunghui V Lin; Roxana Muñoz; Chim Lau; Ma Somsouk; Najwa El-Nachef; Rodney A Hayward
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2012-04-09

8.  A survey of women regarding factors affecting colorectal cancer screening compliance.

Authors:  David S Weinberg; Barbara J Turner; Hao Wang; Ronald E Myers; Suzanne Miller
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.018

9.  Screening flexible sigmoidoscopy: patient attitudes and compliance.

Authors:  B D McCarthy; M A Moskowitz
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Predictors of attendance in the United Kingdom flexible sigmoidoscopy screening trial.

Authors:  S Sutton; J Wardle; T Taylor; K McCaffery; S Williamson; R Edwards; J Cuzick; A Hart; J Northover; W Atkin
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.136

View more
  3 in total

1.  Colorectal Cancer Screening in US Seniors Ages 76-84 Years.

Authors:  Carrie N Klabunde; Jean A Shapiro; Sarah Kobrin; Marion R Nadel; Jane M Zapka
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2015-08

2.  Physician counseling on colorectal cancer screening and receipt of screening among Latino patients.

Authors:  Anna M Nápoles; Jasmine Santoyo-Olsson; Anita L Stewart; Jill Olmstead; Steven E Gregorich; Georgianna Farren; Ruben Cabral; Andrew Freudman; Eliseo J Pérez-Stable
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Factors associated with prostate cancer screening behavior among men over 50 in Fasa, Iran, based on the PRECEDE model.

Authors:  Ali Khani Jeihooni; Seyyed Mansour Kashfi; Seyyed Hannan Kashfi; Akbar Babaei Heydarabadi; Masoumeh Imanzad; Asghar Ashrafi Hafez
Journal:  Electron Physician       Date:  2015-06-05
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.