| Literature DB >> 222442 |
Abstract
The greater in vivo antitumor activity of 4-amino-3-carboxamido-1-(beta-D-ribofuranosyl)pyrazolo[3,4-d]pyrimidine (APPCR) in comparison to the parent compound 4-amino-1-(beta-D-ribofuranosyl)pyrazolo[3,4-d]pyrimidine (APPR) may involve intrinsic differences in the effects of these two compounds on cells, as well as in their metabolisms. In studies with L1210 cells in vitro, growth inhibition by APPCR for 36 hr or more was found to be cytocidal, while growth inhibition by APPR was cytostatic in that a substantial fraction of the cells survived 36 or 72 hr of exposure to growth-inhibiting concentrations of APPR. It appears that this difference in the cellular effects of APPCR and APPR is not related to differences in the requirement for activation by phosphorylation or in susceptibility to inactivation by deamination. However, deamination may limit the effectiveness of APPR in vivo since it is a substrate for adenosine deaminase, while deamination of APPCR is not detectable.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 1979 PMID: 222442
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cancer Res ISSN: 0008-5472 Impact factor: 12.701