Literature DB >> 22243897

Longitudinal study comparing the dynamics of Clostridium difficile in conventional and antimicrobial free pigs at farm and slaughter.

E K Susick1, M Putnam, D M Bermudez, S Thakur.   

Abstract

Clostridium difficile is the leading cause of nosocomial diarrhea in humans and a major cause of enteritis in neonatal piglets, foals and calves. The aim of this longitudinal study was to determine and compare the prevalence, antimicrobial susceptibility, and toxinotype profiles of C. difficile isolated from pigs and their environment in the indoor conventional and outdoor antimicrobial free (ABF) production systems. Ten conventional and eight ABF cohorts of 35 pigs each and their environment were sampled at different stages of production at farm and slaughter. C. difficile prevalence in pigs was highest at the farrowing stage in both conventional (34%, 120/350) and ABF (23%, 56/244) systems, and decreased with age. This reduction in C. difficile prevalence in pigs at later stages of production mirrored the decreased prevalence in the farm environment. At slaughter, C. difficile was isolated at a low frequency from the carcasses and processing environment in both production systems. All but three isolates were resistant to ciprofloxacin (99%, 505/508), while 1.0% (5/508) and 6.0% (23/508) of isolates exhibited resistance to tetracycline and erythromycin, respectively. Toxinotype V (tcdA(+)tcdB(+)) was the predominant strain identified in both systems (conventional: 94%, 376/401; ABF: 82%, 88/107), while the rest were toxinotype XIII (tcdA(+)tcdB(+)). To conclude, we isolated antimicrobial resistant C. difficile regardless of antimicrobial use on the farm. Based on the phenotypic and genotypic similarity of C. difficile isolated in this study, we conclude that the unique production practices employed in conventional and ABF production systems have no impact on the pathogen population. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22243897     DOI: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2011.12.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet Microbiol        ISSN: 0378-1135            Impact factor:   3.293


  10 in total

1.  Clostridium difficile genotypes in piglet populations in Germany.

Authors:  Alexander Schneeberg; Heinrich Neubauer; Gernot Schmoock; Sylvia Baier; Jürgen Harlizius; Hendrik Nienhoff; Katja Brase; Stefan Zimmermann; Christian Seyboldt
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 2.  Clostridium difficile in Food and Animals: A Comprehensive Review.

Authors:  C Rodriguez; B Taminiau; J Van Broeck; M Delmée; G Daube
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.622

3.  Laboratory detection of Clostridium difficile in piglets in Australia.

Authors:  Daniel R Knight; Michele M Squire; Thomas V Riley
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Nationwide surveillance study of Clostridium difficile in Australian neonatal pigs shows high prevalence and heterogeneity of PCR ribotypes.

Authors:  Daniel R Knight; Michele M Squire; Thomas V Riley
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2014-10-17       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Contamination of Retail Meat Samples with Multidrug-Resistant Organisms in Relation to Organic and Conventional Production and Processing: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Data from the United States National Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring System, 2012-2017.

Authors:  Gabriel K Innes; Keeve E Nachman; Alison G Abraham; Joan A Casey; Andrew N Patton; Lance B Price; Sara Y Tartof; Meghan F Davis
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 9.031

6.  Occurrence of Clostridium difficile in seasoned hamburgers and seven processing plants in Iran.

Authors:  Zahra Esfandiari; Scott Weese; Hamid Ezzatpanah; Mohammad Jalali; Mohammad Chamani
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 3.605

7.  Assessment of the Transmission Dynamics of Clostridioides difficile in a Farm Environment Reveals the Presence of a New Toxigenic Strain Connected to Swine Production.

Authors:  Frederico Alves; Alexandra Nunes; Rita Castro; António Sequeira; Olga Moreira; Rui Matias; João Carlos Rodrigues; Leonor Silveira; João Paulo Gomes; Mónica Oleastro
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-04-14       Impact factor: 6.064

8.  Detection, Characterization and Antibiotic Susceptibility of Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile in Meat Products.

Authors:  Karlo Muratoglu; Esra Akkaya; Hamparsun Hampikyan; Enver Baris Bingol; Omer Cetin; Hilal Colak
Journal:  Food Sci Anim Resour       Date:  2020-07-01

9.  The molecular characters and antibiotic resistance of Clostridioides difficile from economic animals in China.

Authors:  Wen-Zhu Zhang; Wen-Ge Li; Yu-Qing Liu; Wen-Peng Gu; Qing Zhang; Hu Li; Zheng-Jie Liu; Xin Zhang; Yuan Wu; Jin-Xing Lu
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2020-03-30       Impact factor: 3.605

Review 10.  Clostridioides (Clostridium) Difficile in Food-Producing Animals, Horses and Household Pets: A Comprehensive Review.

Authors:  Melina Kachrimanidou; Eleni Tzika; George Filioussis
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2019-12-09
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.