Literature DB >> 22242836

The use of tumour volumetrics to assess response to therapy in anticancer clinical trials.

Gregory V Goldmacher1, James Conklin.   

Abstract

Serial evaluations of tumour burden using imaging, mainly computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging, form the basis for assessing treatment response in many clinical trials of anticancer therapeutics. Traditionally, these evaluations have been based on linear measurements of tumour size. Such measurements have limitations related to variability in technical factors, tumour morphology and reader decisions. Measurements of entire tumour volumes may overcome some of the limitations of linear tumour measurements, improving our ability to detect small changes reliably and increasing statistical power per subject in a trial. Certain technical factors are known to affect the accuracy and precision of volume measurements, and work is in progress to define these factors more thoroughly and to qualify tumour volume as a biomarker for the purposes of drug development.
© 2012 The Authors. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology © 2012 The British Pharmacological Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22242836      PMCID: PMC3391506          DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2012.04179.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0306-5251            Impact factor:   4.335


  22 in total

1.  Comparison of diameter and perimeter methods for tumor volume calculation.

Authors:  A G Sorensen; S Patel; C Harmath; S Bridges; J Synnott; A Sievers; Y H Yoon; E J Lee; M C Yang; R F Lewis; G J Harris; M Lev; P W Schaefer; B R Buchbinder; G Barest; K Yamada; J Ponzo; H Y Kwon; J Gemmete; J Farkas; A L Tievsky; R B Ziegler; M R Salhus; R Weisskoff
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2001-01-15       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Tumour size measurement in an oncology clinical trial: comparison between off-site and on-site measurements.

Authors:  A L Belton; S Saini; K Liebermann; G W Boland; E F Halpern
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.350

3.  Updated response assessment criteria for high-grade gliomas: response assessment in neuro-oncology working group.

Authors:  Patrick Y Wen; David R Macdonald; David A Reardon; Timothy F Cloughesy; A Gregory Sorensen; Evanthia Galanis; John Degroot; Wolfgang Wick; Mark R Gilbert; Andrew B Lassman; Christina Tsien; Tom Mikkelsen; Eric T Wong; Marc C Chamberlain; Roger Stupp; Kathleen R Lamborn; Michael A Vogelbaum; Martin J van den Bent; Susan M Chang
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-03-15       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 4.  Noncalcified lung nodules: volumetric assessment with thoracic CT.

Authors:  Marios A Gavrielides; Lisa M Kinnard; Kyle J Myers; Nicholas Petrick
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Volumetric CT in lung cancer: an example for the qualification of imaging as a biomarker.

Authors:  Andrew J Buckler; P David Mozley; Lawrence Schwartz; Nicholas Petrick; Michael McNitt-Gray; Charles Fenimore; Kevin O'Donnell; Wendy Hayes; Hyun J Kim; Laurence Clarke; Daniel Sullivan
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.173

Review 6.  The role of magnetic resonance imaging biomarkers in clinical trials of treatment response in cancer.

Authors:  Thomas E Yankeelov; Lori R Arlinghaus; Xia Li; John C Gore
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.929

7.  Relation between tumour response to first-line chemotherapy and survival in advanced colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Meta-Analysis Group in Cancer.

Authors:  M Buyse; P Thirion; R W Carlson; T Burzykowski; G Molenberghs; P Piedbois
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-07-29       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Three-dimensional volumetrics for tracking vestibular schwannoma growth in neurofibromatosis type II.

Authors:  Gordon J Harris; Scott R Plotkin; Mia Maccollin; Shubha Bhat; Trinity Urban; Michael H Lev; William H Slattery
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 4.654

Review 9.  Response evaluation of gastrointestinal stromal tumors.

Authors:  Haesun Choi
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2008

10.  Interobserver and intraobserver variability in measurement of non-small-cell carcinoma lung lesions: implications for assessment of tumor response.

Authors:  Jeremy J Erasmus; Gregory W Gladish; Lyle Broemeling; Bradley S Sabloff; Mylene T Truong; Roy S Herbst; Reginald F Munden
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-07-01       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  17 in total

Review 1.  Imaging-based tumor treatment response evaluation: review of conventional, new, and emerging concepts.

Authors:  Hee Kang; Ho Yun Lee; Kyung Soo Lee; Jae-Hun Kim
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 3.500

Review 2.  Computerized PET/CT image analysis in the evaluation of tumour response to therapy.

Authors:  W Lu; J Wang; H H Zhang
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Editors' pick 2012.

Authors:  Lionel D Lewis; Andrew Somogyi; Yoon K Loke; Albert Ferro; Adam F Cohen; James M Ritter
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 4.  Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Melanoma: A Review of Pharmacokinetics and Exposure-Response Relationships.

Authors:  Cyril Leven; Maël Padelli; Jean-Luc Carré; Eric Bellissant; Laurent Misery
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 6.447

5.  Are pancreatic IPMN volumes measured on MRI images more reproducible than diameters? An assessment in a large single-institution cohort.

Authors:  Pallavi Pandey; Ankur Pandey; Farnaz Najmi Varzaneh; Mounes Aliyari Ghasabeh; Daniel Fouladi; Pegah Khoshpouri; Nannan Shao; Manijeh Zarghampour; Ralph H Hruban; Marcia Canto; Anne Marie O'Broin-Lennon; Ihab R Kamel
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Positron emission tomography/computerized tomography for tumor response assessment-a review of clinical practices and radiomics studies.

Authors:  Wei Lu; Wengen Chen
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.241

7.  Volumetric assessment of lymph node metastases in patients with non-seminomatous germ cell tumours treated with chemotherapy.

Authors:  Carlos I Basilio-de-Leo; Christian I Villeda-Sandoval; Carolina Culebro-García; Francisco Rodríguez-Covarrubias; Ricardo A Castillejos-Molina
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.862

8.  Perfusion parameters as potential imaging biomarkers for the early prediction of radiotherapy response in a rat tumor model.

Authors:  Ho Yun Lee; Namkug Kim; Jin Mo Goo; Eui Kyu Chie; Hye Jong Song
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2016 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.630

9.  Drugs for solid cancer: the productivity crisis prompts a rethink.

Authors:  Daniel Rösel; Jan Brábek; Pavel Veselý; Michael Fernandes
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 10.  Imaging biomarkers for evaluating tumor response: RECIST and beyond.

Authors:  Ching-Chung Ko; Lee-Ren Yeh; Yu-Ting Kuo; Jeon-Hor Chen
Journal:  Biomark Res       Date:  2021-07-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.