| Literature DB >> 22240798 |
T Ettl1, K Baader, C Stiegler, M Müller, A Agaimy, J Zenk, T Kühnel, M Gosau, K Zeitler, S Schwarz, G Brockhoff.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Activity of the tumour-suppressor gene PTEN is reduced in different types of cancer and implicates non-responsiveness to targeted therapy. This study evaluates the gene and protein status of PTEN in salivary gland carcinomas.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22240798 PMCID: PMC3282188 DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2011.605
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Br J Cancer ISSN: 0007-0920 Impact factor: 7.640
PTEN and clinicopathological parameters
|
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Total | 180 (77.5%) | 35 (15.1%) | 17 (7.3%) | 214 (78.4%) | 59 (21.6%) |
| ACCC | 30 (85.7%) | 5 (14.3%) | 0 | 36 (90.0%) | 4 (10.0%) |
| ADCC | 41 (97.6%) | 1 (2.4%) | 0 | 42 (84.0%) | 8 (16.0%) |
| MEC | 35 (89.7%) | 3 (7.7%) | 1 (2.6%) | 36 (85.7%) | 6 (14.3%) |
| SDC | 8 (33.3%) | 9 (37.5%) | 7 (29.2%) | 14 (58.3%) | 10 (41.7%) |
| ACNOS | 11 (50.0%) | 5 (22.7%) | 6 (27.3%) | 19 (70.4%) | 8 (29.6%) |
| SQCC | 15 (57.7%) | 9 (34.6%) | 2 (7.7%) | 17 (63.0%) | 10 (37.0%) |
| MYEC | 15 (83.3%) | 2 (11.1%) | 1 (5.6%) | 19 (95.0%) | 1 (5.0%) |
| Others | 25 (13.9%) | 1 (2.7%) | 0 | 31 (72.1%) | 12 (27.9%) |
|
| |||||
| <70 | 108 (82.4%) | 15 (11.5%) | 8 (6.1%) | ||
| >70 | 48 (68.6%) | 14 (20.0%) | 8 (11.4%) | ||
|
| |||||
| Low/intermediate | |||||
| High | |||||
|
| |||||
| T1–T2 | 103 (79.2%) | 19 (14.6%) | 8 (6.2%) | ||
| T3–T4 | 73 (74.5%) | 16 (16.3%) | 9 (9.2%) | ||
|
| |||||
| N0 | |||||
| N1–3 | |||||
|
| |||||
| No CNG | |||||
| CNG | |||||
|
| |||||
| 0+,1+,2+ | 153 (81.4%) | 35 (18.6%) | |||
| 3+ | 35 (71.4%) | 14 (28.6%) | |||
|
| |||||
| No amplification | 171 (79.9%) | 43 (20.1%) | |||
| Amplification | 7 (63.6%) | 4 (36.4%) | |||
|
| |||||
| 0, 1+, 2+ | |||||
| 3+ | |||||
Abbreviations: ACC=adenoid cystic carcinoma; ACNOS=adenocarcinoma NOS; CNG=copy number gain; EGFR=epidermal growth factor receptor; FISH=fluorescence in situ hybridisation; HER2=human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; IHC=immunohistochemistry; MEC=mucoepidermoid carcinoma; MYEC=myoepithelial carcinoma; Neg=negative; Pos=positive; PTEN=phosphatase and tensin homologue located on chromosome 10; SDC=salivary duct carcinoma; SQCC=squamous cell carcinoma.
*P⩽0.05, **P⩽0.01, ***P⩽0.001. Statistically significant associations are highlighted in bold.
Figure 1(A) Strong nuclear and cytoplasmic PTEN immunostaining in ACCC (IRS 300, × 200). (B) Strong nuclear PTEN staining in ACC (IRS 300, × 100), (C) Weak nuclear PTEN staining in ACC (IRS 10, × 200). (D) Disomy of genomic PTEN in ACCC. (E) Hemizygous deletion of PTEN in ACCC. (F) Homozygous deletion of PTEN in SDC. (G) 3+ staining of HER2 in SDC ( × 200). (H) 3+ staining of EGFR in ACC ( × 200). (I) Cluster amplification of HER2 in SDC. (J) Cluster amplification of EGFR in MEC.
Figure 2Univariate Kaplan–Meier survival analyses for IHC and FISH of PTEN, EGFR and HER2.
Univariate (Kaplan-Meier – log-rank) and multivariate (Cox regression – Enter) analysis
|
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Grade | G1/G2 |
| 0.052 | 2.56 (0.99–6.60) |
| T-stage | 1, 2 |
|
| 2.50 (1.10–5.69) |
| N-stage | 0 |
| 0.061 | 2.06 (0.97–4.38) |
| R-stage | R0 |
|
| 3.03 (1.43–6.43) |
| EGFR FISH | No CNG |
| 0.964 | 1.02 (0.40–2.64) |
| EGFR IHC | Neg |
| 0.111 | 1.94 (0.86–4.39) |
| HER2 FISH | No Ampl |
| 0.634 | 0.71 (0.18–2.89) |
| HER2 IHC | Neg |
| 0.301 | 0.60 (0.23–1.58) |
| PTEN FISH | No Del |
|
| 3.17 (1.29–7.78) |
| PTEN IHC | Pos |
| 0.397 | 1.49 (0.59–3.77) |
Abbreviations: Ampl=amplification; CI=confidence interval; CNG=copy number gain; Del=deletion; EGFR=epidermal growth factor receptor; FISH=fluorescence in situ hybridisation; HER2=human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; HR=hazard ratio; IHC=immunohistochemistry; n=number of patients; Neg=negative; Pos=positive; PTEN=phosphatase and tensin homologue located on chromosome 10; R=residual tumour. Statistically significant associations are highlighted in bold.