Literature DB >> 22240510

Silk protein fibroin from Antheraea mylitta for cardiac tissue engineering.

Chinmoy Patra1, Sarmistha Talukdar, Tatyana Novoyatleva, Siva R Velagala, Christian Mühlfeld, Banani Kundu, Subhas C Kundu, Felix B Engel.   

Abstract

The human heart cannot regenerate after an injury. Lost cardiomyocytes are replaced by scar tissue resulting in reduced cardiac function causing high morbidity and mortality. One possible solution to this problem is cardiac tissue engineering. Here, we have investigated the suitability of non-mulberry silk protein fibroin from Indian tropical tasar Antheraea mylitta as a scaffold for engineering a cardiac patch in vitro. We have tested cell adhesion, cellular metabolic activity, response to extracellular stimuli, cell-to-cell communication and contractility of 3-days postnatal rat cardiomyocytes on silk fibroin. Our data demonstrate that A. mylitta silk fibroin exhibits similar properties as fibronectin, a component of the natural matrix for cardiomyocytes. Comparison to mulberry Bombyx mori silk protein fibroin shows that A. mylitta silk fibroin is superior probably due to its RGD domains. 3D scaffolds can efficiently be loaded with cardiomyocytes resulting in contractile patches. In conclusion, our findings demonstrate that A. mylitta silk fibroin 3D scaffolds are suitable for the engineering of cardiac patches.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22240510     DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.12.036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomaterials        ISSN: 0142-9612            Impact factor:   12.479


  41 in total

1.  A comparison of electrospun polymers reveals poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) fiber as a superior scaffold for cardiac repair.

Authors:  Delia Castellano; María Blanes; Bruno Marco; Inmaculada Cerrada; Amparo Ruiz-Saurí; Beatriz Pelacho; Miriam Araña; Jose A Montero; Vicente Cambra; Felipe Prosper; Pilar Sepúlveda
Journal:  Stem Cells Dev       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 3.272

Review 2.  Physiologically inspired cardiac scaffolds for tailored in vivo function and heart regeneration.

Authors:  Nicholas J Kaiser; Kareen L K Coulombe
Journal:  Biomed Mater       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 3.715

Review 3.  Model systems for cardiovascular regenerative biology.

Authors:  Jessica C Garbern; Christine L Mummery; Richard T Lee
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2013-04-01       Impact factor: 6.915

4.  Nonmulberry Silk Based Ink for Fabricating Mechanically Robust Cardiac Patches and Endothelialized Myocardium-on-a-Chip Application.

Authors:  Shreya Mehrotra; Bruna A G de Melo; Minoru Hirano; Wendy Keung; Ronald A Li; Biman B Mandal; Su Ryon Shin
Journal:  Adv Funct Mater       Date:  2020-01-20       Impact factor: 18.808

5.  Poly(glycerol sebacate)/poly(butylene succinate-butylene dilinoleate) fibrous scaffolds for cardiac tissue engineering.

Authors:  Marwa Tallawi; David C Zebrowski; Ranjana Rai; Judith A Roether; Dirk W Schubert; Miroslawa El Fray; Felix B Engel; Katerina E Aifantis; Aldo R Boccaccini
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part C Methods       Date:  2015-03-06       Impact factor: 3.056

Review 6.  Engineering cardiac microphysiological systems to model pathological extracellular matrix remodeling.

Authors:  Nethika R Ariyasinghe; Davi M Lyra-Leite; Megan L McCain
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 4.733

7.  The current status of iPS cells in cardiac research and their potential for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.

Authors:  Ana M Martins; Gordana Vunjak-Novakovic; Rui L Reis
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 5.739

Review 8.  Recent trends in the application of widely used natural and synthetic polymer nanocomposites in bone tissue regeneration.

Authors:  Angshuman Bharadwaz; Ambalangodage C Jayasuriya
Journal:  Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl       Date:  2020-01-29       Impact factor: 7.328

Review 9.  Patching the heart: cardiac repair from within and outside.

Authors:  Lei Ye; Wolfram-Hubertus Zimmermann; Daniel J Garry; Jianyi Zhang
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 17.367

10.  Organ-specific function of adhesion G protein-coupled receptor GPR126 is domain-dependent.

Authors:  Chinmoy Patra; Machteld J van Amerongen; Subhajit Ghosh; Filomena Ricciardi; Amna Sajjad; Tatyana Novoyatleva; Amit Mogha; Kelly R Monk; Christian Mühlfeld; Felix B Engel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-09-30       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.