Literature DB >> 22238771

Effect of needle geometry on flow rate and cell damage in the dispensing-based biofabrication process.

Minggan Li1, Xiaoyu Tian, David J Schreyer, Xiongbiao Chen.   

Abstract

Biodispensing techniques have been widely applied in biofabrication processes to deliver cell suspensions and biomaterials to create cell-seeded constructs. Under identical operating conditions,two types of dispensing needles—tapered and cylindrical—can result in different flow rates of material and different cell damage percent induced by the mechanical forces. In this work, mathematical models of both flow rate and cell damage percent in biodispensing systems using tapered and cylindrical needles, respectively, were developed, and experiments were carried out to verify the effectiveness of the developed models. Both simulations and experiments show tapered needles produce much higher flow rates under the same pressure conditions than cylindrical needles. Use of a lower pressure in a tapered needle can therefore achieve the same flow rate as that in a cylindrical needle. At equivalent flow rates, cell damage in a tapered needle is lower than that in a cylindrical one. Both Schwann cells and 3T3 fibroblasts, which have been widely used in tissue engineering, were used to validate the cell damage models. Application of the developed models to specify the influence of process parameters, including needle geometry and air pressure, on the flow rate and cell damage percent represents a significant advance for biofabrication processes.The models can be used to optimize process parameters to preserve cell viability and achieve the desired cell distribution in dispensing-based biofabrication.
Copyright © 2011 American Institute of Chemical Engineers (AIChE).

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22238771     DOI: 10.1002/btpr.679

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biotechnol Prog        ISSN: 1520-6033


  10 in total

Review 1.  Cardiovascular tissue bioprinting: Physical and chemical processes.

Authors:  James B Hu; Martin L Tomov; Jan W Buikema; Caressa Chen; Morteza Mahmoudi; Sean M Wu; Vahid Serpooshan
Journal:  Appl Phys Rev       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 19.162

2.  Automated Robotic Dispensing Technique for Surface Guidance and Bioprinting of Cells.

Authors:  Ramya Bhuthalingam; Pei Q Lim; Scott A Irvine; Subbu S Venkatraman
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 1.355

3.  Assessment of Forces in Intradermal Injection Devices: Hydrodynamic Versus Human Factors.

Authors:  Stijn Verwulgen; Koen Beyers; Timothi Van Mulder; Thomas Peeters; Steven Truijen; Francis Dams; Vanessa Vankerckhoven
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 4.200

4.  Computational Fluid Dynamics Assessment of the Effect of Bioprinting Parameters in Extrusion Bioprinting.

Authors:  Rashik Chand; Beni Shimwa Muhire; Sanjairaj Vijayavenkataraman
Journal:  Int J Bioprint       Date:  2022-03-22

Review 5.  Biomechanical factors in three-dimensional tissue bioprinting.

Authors:  Liqun Ning; Carmen J Gil; Boeun Hwang; Andrea S Theus; Lilanni Perez; Martin L Tomov; Holly Bauser-Heaton; Vahid Serpooshan
Journal:  Appl Phys Rev       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 19.162

6.  Multifunctional 3D printing of heterogeneous hydrogel structures.

Authors:  Ali Nadernezhad; Navid Khani; Gözde Akdeniz Skvortsov; Burak Toprakhisar; Ezgi Bakirci; Yusuf Menceloglu; Serkan Unal; Bahattin Koc
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 7.  Application of Extrusion-Based Hydrogel Bioprinting for Cartilage Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Fu You; B Frank Eames; Xiongbiao Chen
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2017-07-23       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 8.  Printability and Cell Viability in Extrusion-Based Bioprinting from Experimental, Computational, and Machine Learning Views.

Authors:  Ali Malekpour; Xiongbiao Chen
Journal:  J Funct Biomater       Date:  2022-04-10

Review 9.  Emulating Human Tissues and Organs: A Bioprinting Perspective Toward Personalized Medicine.

Authors:  Ana Clotilde Fonseca; Ferry P W Melchels; Miguel J S Ferreira; Samuel R Moxon; Geoffrey Potjewyd; Tim R Dargaville; Susan J Kimber; Marco Domingos
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 60.622

10.  Viability of equine mesenchymal stem cells during transport and implantation.

Authors:  Elaine R Garvican; Sandra Cree; Lydia Bull; Roger Kw Smith; Jayesh Dudhia
Journal:  Stem Cell Res Ther       Date:  2014-08-08       Impact factor: 6.832

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.