INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study was to evaluate the intra- and interdevice repeatability in different tooth regions using three color-measuring devices under clinical conditions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifteen shade measurements (cervical, body, incisal) were recorded on 15 patients by one investigator using three color-measuring devices (VITA Easyshade compact, DeguDent Shadepilot, X-Rite ShadeVision). CIE Lab values were determined for all maxillary anterior teeth. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used to statistically analyze intra-and inter-device repeatability for different tooth regions. Color differences (ΔE) between measurements were also computed to evaluate the clinical acceptability of repeatability values. The data were evaluated using analysis of variance and Bonferroni's adjustment to control for multiple testing. Differences were deemed significant when P < 0.016. RESULTS: The three color-measuring devices generally exhibited high repeatability of color coordinates for all tooth regions (ICC > 0.516-0.986, ΔE < 3.03). In contrast, inter-device repeatability was lower for all tooth regions (ICC = 0.010-0.922, ΔE = 4.06-16.04). CONCLUSIONS: High intra-device repeatability of color coordinates could be achieved for all tooth regions when the same color-measuring device was used. However, because of low inter-device repeatability, results using different color-measuring devices are not comparable.
INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study was to evaluate the intra- and interdevice repeatability in different tooth regions using three color-measuring devices under clinical conditions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifteen shade measurements (cervical, body, incisal) were recorded on 15 patients by one investigator using three color-measuring devices (VITA Easyshade compact, DeguDent Shadepilot, X-Rite ShadeVision). CIE Lab values were determined for all maxillary anterior teeth. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used to statistically analyze intra-and inter-device repeatability for different tooth regions. Color differences (ΔE) between measurements were also computed to evaluate the clinical acceptability of repeatability values. The data were evaluated using analysis of variance and Bonferroni's adjustment to control for multiple testing. Differences were deemed significant when P < 0.016. RESULTS: The three color-measuring devices generally exhibited high repeatability of color coordinates for all tooth regions (ICC > 0.516-0.986, ΔE < 3.03). In contrast, inter-device repeatability was lower for all tooth regions (ICC = 0.010-0.922, ΔE = 4.06-16.04). CONCLUSIONS: High intra-device repeatability of color coordinates could be achieved for all tooth regions when the same color-measuring device was used. However, because of low inter-device repeatability, results using different color-measuring devices are not comparable.
Authors: Henning Staedt; Eva Mally; Herbert Scheller; Stefan Wentaschek; Peer Wolfgang Kämmerer; Adrian Kasaj; Alessandro Devigus; Karl Martin Lehmann Journal: Clin Oral Investig Date: 2020-06-22 Impact factor: 3.573