BACKGROUND: BR.21 is a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of second-/third-line erlotinib in stage IIIB/IV non-small cell lung cancer patients. Predictive and prognostic analyses of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), ABCG2, and AKT1 genetic polymorphisms were performed. METHODS:Two hundred forty-two patients were genotyped for EGFR-216G>T (EGFR216), EGFR-191C>A (EGFR191), EGFR intron 1 CA-dinucleotide-repeat (CADR), ABCG2+421C>A (ABCG2), and AKT1-SNP4G>A (AKT1). Cox proportional hazard and logistic regression models compared genotypes with overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and presence/absence of skin toxicity. RESULTS: Prognostic evaluation was based on the placeboarm: patients carrying at least one CADR long allele (>16 repeats) had a trend toward worse PFS: the adjusted hazard ratio was 1.7 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.0-3.0; p = 0.07). EGFR216, EGFR191, ABCG2, and AKT1 were not prognostic. Polymorphisms were not predictive for erlotinib effect (OS/PFS): no treatment-polymorphism interactions were demonstrated. Individuals carrying the rare T/T genotype of EGFR216 had an adjusted odds ratio of 8.8 (95% CI: 1.1-72; p = 0.04) of developing skin toxicity; no other significant polymorphic relationships with skin toxicity were found. CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to previous publications, carrying shorter alleles of the EGFR CADR polymorphism was not predictive of OS or PFS. EGFR216 homozygous variants were associated with greater skin toxicity from erlotinib.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: BR.21 is a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of second-/third-line erlotinib in stage IIIB/IV non-small cell lung cancerpatients. Predictive and prognostic analyses of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), ABCG2, and AKT1 genetic polymorphisms were performed. METHODS: Two hundred forty-two patients were genotyped for EGFR-216G>T (EGFR216), EGFR-191C>A (EGFR191), EGFR intron 1 CA-dinucleotide-repeat (CADR), ABCG2+421C>A (ABCG2), and AKT1-SNP4G>A (AKT1). Cox proportional hazard and logistic regression models compared genotypes with overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and presence/absence of skin toxicity. RESULTS: Prognostic evaluation was based on the placebo arm: patients carrying at least one CADR long allele (>16 repeats) had a trend toward worse PFS: the adjusted hazard ratio was 1.7 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.0-3.0; p = 0.07). EGFR216, EGFR191, ABCG2, and AKT1 were not prognostic. Polymorphisms were not predictive for erlotinib effect (OS/PFS): no treatment-polymorphism interactions were demonstrated. Individuals carrying the rare T/T genotype of EGFR216 had an adjusted odds ratio of 8.8 (95% CI: 1.1-72; p = 0.04) of developing skin toxicity; no other significant polymorphic relationships with skin toxicity were found. CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to previous publications, carrying shorter alleles of the EGFR CADR polymorphism was not predictive of OS or PFS. EGFR216 homozygous variants were associated with greater skin toxicity from erlotinib.