Literature DB >> 22236529

The influence of acetabular cup material on pelvis cortex surface strains, measured using digital image correlation.

A S Dickinson1, A C Taylor, M Browne.   

Abstract

Acetabular cup loosening is a late failure mode of total hip replacements, and peri-prosthetic bone deterioration may promote earlier failure. Preservation of supporting bone quality is a goal for implant design and materials selection, to avoid stress shielding and bone resorption. Advanced polymer composite materials have closer stiffness to bone than metals, ceramics or polymers, and have been hypothesised to promote less adverse bone adaptation. Computer simulations have supported this hypothesis, and the present study aimed to verify this experimentally. A composite hemi-pelvis was implanted with Cobalt Chromium (CoCr), polyethylene (UHMWPE) and MOTIS(®)carbon-fibre-reinforced polyether etherketone (CFR-PEEK) acetabular cups. In each case, load was applied to the implanted pelvis and Digital Image Correlation (DIC) was used for surface strain measurement. The test was repeated for an intact hemi-pelvis. Trends in implanted vs. intact bone principal strains were inspected to assess the average principal strain magnitude change, allowing comparison of the potential bone responses to implantation with the three cups. The CFR-PEEK cup was observed to produce the closest bone strain to the intact hip in the main load path, the superior peri-acetabular cortex (+12% on average, R(2)=0.84), in comparison to CoCr (+40%, R(2)=0.91) and UHWMPE cups (-26%, R(2)=0.94). Clinical observations have indicated that increased periacetabular cortex loading may result in reduced polar cancellous bone loading, leading to longer term losses in periprosthetic bone mineral density. This study provides experimental evidence to verify previous computational studies, indicating that cups produced using materials with stiffness closer to cortical bone recreate physiological cortical bone strains more closely and could, therefore, potentially promote less adverse bone adaptation than stiffer press-fitted implants in current use.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22236529     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.11.042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  13 in total

Review 1.  Carbon fibre reinforced PEEK versus traditional metallic implants for orthopaedic trauma surgery: A systematic review.

Authors:  Kanthan Theivendran; Faizan Arshad; Umar-Khetaab Hanif; Aleksi Reito; Xavier Griffin; Clary J Foote
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2021-10-28

2.  Biomechanics of a bone-periodontal ligament-tooth fibrous joint.

Authors:  Jeremy D Lin; Hüseyin Özcoban; Janelle P Greene; Andrew T Jang; Sabra I Djomehri; Kevin P Fahey; Luke L Hunter; Gerold A Schneider; Sunita P Ho
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2012-12-07       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 3.  The Use of Carbon-Fiber-Reinforced (CFR) PEEK Material in Orthopedic Implants: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Chuan Silvia Li; Christopher Vannabouathong; Sheila Sprague; Mohit Bhandari
Journal:  Clin Med Insights Arthritis Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2015-02-23

4.  Digital image correlation as a tool for three-dimensional strain analysis in human tendon tissue.

Authors:  Thomas Luyckx; Matthias Verstraete; Karel De Roo; Wim De Waele; Johan Bellemans; Jan Victor
Journal:  J Exp Orthop       Date:  2014-06-26

5.  A preclinical numerical assessment of a polyetheretherketone femoral component in total knee arthroplasty during gait.

Authors:  Lennert de Ruiter; Dennis Janssen; Adam Briscoe; Nico Verdonschot
Journal:  J Exp Orthop       Date:  2017-02-01

6.  Intra- and inter-observer agreement and reliability of bone mineral density measurements around acetabular cup: a porcine ex-vivo study using single- and dual-energy computed tomography.

Authors:  Bo Mussmann; Søren Overgaard; Trine Torfing; Morten Bøgehøj; Oke Gerke; Poul Erik Andersen
Journal:  Acta Radiol Open       Date:  2017-07-14

7.  In vitro hip testing in the International Society of Biomechanics coordinate system.

Authors:  Richard J van Arkel; Jonathan R T Jeffers
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2016-10-29       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  Reduced tibial strain-shielding with extraosseous total knee arthroplasty revision system.

Authors:  Tomas A Correa; Bidyut Pal; Richard J van Arkel; Felice Vanacore; Andrew A Amis
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2018-10-10       Impact factor: 2.242

9.  Does a PEEK Femoral TKA Implant Preserve Intact Femoral Surface Strains Compared With CoCr? A Preliminary Laboratory Study.

Authors:  Kathryn E Rankin; Alexander S Dickinson; Adam Briscoe; Martin Browne
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  The mechanical response of a polyetheretherketone femoral knee implant under a deep squatting loading condition.

Authors:  Lennert de Ruiter; Dennis Janssen; Adam Briscoe; Nico Verdonschot
Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H       Date:  2017-11-04       Impact factor: 1.617

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.