Literature DB >> 22234931

Completeness of dictated operative reports in breast cancer--the case for synoptic reporting.

Laura Donahoe1, Sean Bennett, Walley Temple, Andrea Hilchie-Pye, Kelly Dabbs, Ethel Macintosh, Geoff Porter.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Currently, the dictated operative report forms the cornerstone of documenting breast cancer surgery. Synoptic electronic reporting using a standardized template has been proposed for breast cancer operative notes to improve documentation. The goal of this study was to determine the current completeness of dictated operative reports for breast cancer surgery.
METHODS: An iterative, consensus-based approach to determining elements of a proposed synoptic surgical operative report identified critical elements. We then evaluated the dictated operative reports of 100 consecutive breast cancer patients for completeness of these elements.
RESULTS: Details regarding presentation and diagnosis were frequently incomplete (84%). Among patients undergoing mastectomy, the potential for breast conservation was partially described in only 60%. Only 41% had data regarding intra-operative margin assessment during breast conservation surgery. In axillary lymph node dissections, 92% of patients had complete data about preservation of nerves, yet only 14% of reports contained complete information regarding sentinel lymph node biopsy. Closure was partially described in 91%.
CONCLUSIONS: The dictated operative report for breast cancer surgery does not adequately capture important data. A synoptic reporting system, which requires documentation of important elements, is a potentially beneficial tool in breast cancer surgery.
Copyright © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22234931     DOI: 10.1002/jso.23031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0022-4790            Impact factor:   3.454


  14 in total

Review 1.  Guidelines for synoptic reporting of surgery and pathology in Hirschsprung disease.

Authors:  Laura V Veras; Michael Arnold; Jeffrey R Avansino; Kevin Bove; Robert A Cowles; Megan M Durham; Allan M Goldstein; Chandra Krishnan; Jacob C Langer; Marc Levitt; Hector Monforte-Munoz; Raja Rabah; Miguel Reyes-Mugica; Michael D Rollins; Raj P Kapur; Ankush Gosain
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2019-03-21       Impact factor: 2.545

2.  A study of actions in operative notes.

Authors:  Yan Wang; Serguei Pakhomov; Nora E Burkart; James O Ryan; Genevieve B Melton
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2012-11-03

3.  Comparison of Systematic Video Documentation With Narrative Operative Report in Colorectal Cancer Surgery.

Authors:  Floyd W van de Graaf; Marilyne M Lange; Jolanda I Spakman; Wilhelmina M U van Grevenstein; Daan Lips; Eelco J R de Graaf; Anand G Menon; Johan F Lange
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 14.766

4.  Development of consensus-derived quality indicators for laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy operative reports.

Authors:  Ashley Vergis; Garrett G R J Johnson; Krista Hardy; Jeffrey Gu; Alistair Sharples; Shannon Stogryn
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 3.453

5.  Quality of narrative operative reports in pancreatic surgery.

Authors:  Meagan E Wiebe; Lakhbir Sandhu; Julie L Takata; Erin D Kennedy; Nancy N Baxter; Anna R Gagliardi; David R Urbach; Alice C Wei
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 2.089

6.  Exploring the interpersonal-, organization-, and system-level factors that influence the implementation and use of an innovation-synoptic reporting-in cancer care.

Authors:  Robin Urquhart; Geoffrey A Porter; Eva Grunfeld; Joan Sargeant
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 7.327

7.  Reply to: Synoptic operative reports for quality improvement in pediatric cancer care: Surgical protocol violations in children with renal tumors provides an opportunity to improve pediatric cancer care: A report from the Children's Oncology Group.

Authors:  Peter F Ehrlich
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2018-06-12       Impact factor: 3.838

8.  Assessing the Quality of Rectal Cancer Pathology Reports in National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocol R-04/NRG Oncology.

Authors:  Shonan Sho; Greg Yothers; Linda H Colangelo; Patricia A Ganz; Michael J O'Connell; Robert W Beart; Marian Hemmelgarn; Formosa C Chen; Clifford Y Ko; Marcia M Russell
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 4.412

9.  Multi-level factors influence the implementation and use of complex innovations in cancer care: a multiple case study of synoptic reporting.

Authors:  Robin Urquhart; Geoffrey A Porter; Joan Sargeant; Lois Jackson; Eva Grunfeld
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2014-09-16       Impact factor: 7.327

10.  Imaging for Quality Control: Comparison of Systematic Video Recording to the Operative Note in Colorectal Cancer Surgery. A Pilot Study.

Authors:  F W van de Graaf; M M Lange; A G Menon; P R A O'Mahoney; J W Milsom; J F Lange
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 5.344

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.