BACKGROUND: Control of epigenetic changes using histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACi) is thought to be a promising target in therapy of gastrointestinal (GI) cancer. In this study, we evaluated the safety, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of two dosing regimens of vorinostat, an oral HDACi, in patients with GI tumors. METHODS: Patients received either vorinostat 300 mg bid for 3 consecutive days followed by 4 rest days per cycle (n = 10) or vorinostat 400 mg qd for 21 consecutive days per cycle (n = 6). Pharmacokinetic parameters were assessed for the first treatment cycle. Efficacy was determined through evaluation of tumors and assessment of treatment response. RESULTS: The median treatment duration of 300 mg bid was 52.0 days and of 400 mg qd was 51.5 days. The most common drug-related adverse events were anorexia, nausea, fatigue, and hyperglycemia. Two patients taking 400 mg qd had dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of thrombocytopenia. No patients taking 300 mg bid experienced DLT. Five patients taking 300 mg bid and 2 patients taking 400 mg qd maintained stable disease for >8 weeks, with the maximum duration of 245 days. Mean drug exposure (±SD) was generally higher with 400 mg qd (area under the curve [AUC(0-∞)] of 7.75 ± 2.79 μM h on Day 1 post-dose) compared with 300 mg bid (AUC(0-∞) of 3.94 ± 1.56 μM h on Day 1 post-dose). CONCLUSIONS: Vorinostat 300 mg bid for 3 consecutive days followed by 4 days of rest was better tolerated in patients with GI cancer than a higher once daily dose. Additionally, there were patients in both groups who achieved stable disease, most maintaining it for longer than 8 weeks, suggesting vorinostat as a possible active agent in the treatment of GI cancer.
BACKGROUND: Control of epigenetic changes using histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACi) is thought to be a promising target in therapy of gastrointestinal (GI) cancer. In this study, we evaluated the safety, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of two dosing regimens of vorinostat, an oral HDACi, in patients with GI tumors. METHODS:Patients received either vorinostat 300 mg bid for 3 consecutive days followed by 4 rest days per cycle (n = 10) or vorinostat 400 mg qd for 21 consecutive days per cycle (n = 6). Pharmacokinetic parameters were assessed for the first treatment cycle. Efficacy was determined through evaluation of tumors and assessment of treatment response. RESULTS: The median treatment duration of 300 mg bid was 52.0 days and of 400 mg qd was 51.5 days. The most common drug-related adverse events were anorexia, nausea, fatigue, and hyperglycemia. Two patients taking 400 mg qd had dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of thrombocytopenia. No patients taking 300 mg bid experienced DLT. Five patients taking 300 mg bid and 2 patients taking 400 mg qd maintained stable disease for >8 weeks, with the maximum duration of 245 days. Mean drug exposure (±SD) was generally higher with 400 mg qd (area under the curve [AUC(0-∞)] of 7.75 ± 2.79 μM h on Day 1 post-dose) compared with 300 mg bid (AUC(0-∞) of 3.94 ± 1.56 μM h on Day 1 post-dose). CONCLUSIONS:Vorinostat 300 mg bid for 3 consecutive days followed by 4 days of rest was better tolerated in patients with GI cancer than a higher once daily dose. Additionally, there were patients in both groups who achieved stable disease, most maintaining it for longer than 8 weeks, suggesting vorinostat as a possible active agent in the treatment of GI cancer.
Authors: Eric H Rubin; Nancy G B Agrawal; Evan J Friedman; Pamela Scott; Kathryn E Mazina; Linda Sun; Lihong Du; Justin L Ricker; Stanley R Frankel; Keith M Gottesdiener; John A Wagner; Marian Iwamoto Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2006-12-01 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: William Kevin Kelly; Owen A O'Connor; Lee M Krug; Judy H Chiao; Mark Heaney; Tracy Curley; Barbara MacGregore-Cortelli; William Tong; J Paul Secrist; Lawrence Schwartz; Stacy Richardson; Elaina Chu; Semra Olgac; Paul A Marks; Howard Scher; Victoria M Richon Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2005-05-16 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: L M Butler; D B Agus; H I Scher; B Higgins; A Rose; C Cordon-Cardo; H T Thaler; R A Rifkind; P A Marks; V M Richon Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2000-09-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Elise A Olsen; Youn H Kim; Timothy M Kuzel; Theresa R Pacheco; Francine M Foss; Sareeta Parker; Stanley R Frankel; Cong Chen; Justin L Ricker; Jean Marie Arduino; Madeleine Duvic Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2007-06-18 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Lee M Krug; Tracy Curley; Lawrence Schwartz; Stacie Richardson; Paul Marks; Judy Chiao; W Kevin Kelly Journal: Clin Lung Cancer Date: 2006-01 Impact factor: 4.785
Authors: Evanthia Galanis; Kurt A Jaeckle; Matthew J Maurer; Joel M Reid; Matthew M Ames; James S Hardwick; John F Reilly; Andrey Loboda; Michael Nebozhyn; Valeria R Fantin; Victoria M Richon; Bernd Scheithauer; Caterina Giannini; Patrick J Flynn; Dennis F Moore; James Zwiebel; Jan C Buckner Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-03-23 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Tram Anh Tran; Jennifer Wichterman-Kouznetsova; Diana Varghese; Ruili Huang; Wenwei Huang; Matthias Becker; Christopher P Austin; James Inglese; Ronald L Johnson; Elisabeth D Martinez Journal: ACS Chem Biol Date: 2014-09-16 Impact factor: 5.100
Authors: Eric Deutsch; Elizabeth Cohen-Jonathan Moyal; Vanesa Gregorc; Paolo Andrea Zucali; Jean Menard; Jean-Charles Soria; Ioana Kloos; Jeff Hsu; Ying Luan; Emily Liu; Remus Vezan; Thorsten Graef; Sofia Rivera Journal: Oncotarget Date: 2016-12-24