Literature DB >> 22234428

Composition of extrafloral nectar influences interactions between the myrmecophyte Humboldtia brunonis and its ant associates.

Megha Shenoy1, Venkatesan Radhika, Suma Satish, Renee M Borges.   

Abstract

Ant-plant interactions often are mediated by extrafloral nectar (EFN) composition that may influence plant visitation by ants. Over a 300 km range in the Indian Western Ghats, we investigated the correlation between the EFN composition of the myrmecophytic ant-plant Humboldtia brunonis (Fabaceae) and the number and species of ants visiting EFN. EFN composition varied among H. brunonis populations and between plant organs (floral bud vs. young leaf EFN). In general, EFN was rich in sugars with small quantities of amino acids, especially essential amino acids, and had moderate invertase activity. In experiments at the study sites with sugar and amino acid solutions and with leaf or floral bud EFN mimics, dominant EFN-feeding ants differentiated between solutions as well as between mimics. The castration parasite Crematogaster dohrni (northern study site) was the least selective and did not exhibit any clear feeding preferences, while the largely trophobiont-tending non-protective Myrmicaria brunnea (middle study site) preferred higher sucrose concentrations and certain essential/non-essential amino acid mixtures. The mutualistic Technomyrmex albipes (southern study site) preferred sucrose over glucose or fructose solutions and consumed the leaf EFN mimic to a greater extent than the floral bud EFN mimic. This young leaf EFN mimic had low sugar concentrations, the lowest viscosity and sugar:amino acid ratio, was rich in essential amino acids, and appeared ideally suited to the digestive physiology of T. albipes. This preference for young leaf EFN may explain the greater protection afforded to young leaves than to floral buds by T. albipes, and may also help to resolve ant-pollinator conflicts. The differential response of dominant ants to sugar, amino acids, or solution viscosity suggests that plants can fine-tune their interactions with local ants via EFN composition. Thus, EFN can mediate local partner-choice mechanisms in ant-plant interactions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22234428     DOI: 10.1007/s10886-011-0052-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Ecol        ISSN: 0098-0331            Impact factor:   2.626


  19 in total

1.  Mutualism as reciprocal exploitation: African plant-ants defend foliar but not reproductive structures.

Authors:  Todd M Palmer; Alison K Brody
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 5.499

2.  Density-mediated, context-dependent consumer-resource interactions between ants and extrafloral nectar plants.

Authors:  Scott A Chamberlain; J Nathaniel Holland
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 5.499

Review 3.  Nectar chemistry is tailored for both attraction of mutualists and protection from exploiters.

Authors:  Marcia González-Teuber; Martin Heil
Journal:  Plant Signal Behav       Date:  2009-09-24

4.  The fitness consequences of bearing domatia and having the right ant partner: experiments with protective and non-protective ants in a semi-myrmecophyte.

Authors:  Laurence Gaume; Merry Zacharias; Vladimir Grosbois; Renee M Borges
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2005-10-20       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Postsecretory hydrolysis of nectar sucrose and specialization in ant/plant mutualism.

Authors:  M Heil; J Rattke; W Boland
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-04-22       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Responses of the ant Lasius niger to various compounds perceived as sweet in humans: a structure-activity relationship study.

Authors:  J M Tinti; C Nofre
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.160

7.  Divergent investment strategies of Acacia myrmecophytes and the coexistence of mutualists and exploiters.

Authors:  Martin Heil; Marcia González-Teuber; Lars W Clement; Stefanie Kautz; Manfred Verhaagh; Juan Carlos Silva Bueno
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-08-28       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  How plants shape the ant community in the Amazonian rainforest canopy: the key role of extrafloral nectaries and homopteran honeydew.

Authors:  Nico Blüthgen; Manfred Verhaagh; William Goitía; Klaus Jaffé; Wilfried Morawetz; Wilhelm Barthlott
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2014-03-03       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Liquid-feeding performances of ants (Formicidae): ecological and evolutionary implications.

Authors:  Diane W Davidson; Steven C Cook; Roy R Snelling
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2004-03-18       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  The extrafloral nectaries of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.) II. Nectar composition, origin of nectar solutes, and nectary functioning.

Authors:  J S Pate; M B Peoples; P J Storer; C A Atkins
Journal:  Planta       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 4.116

View more
  5 in total

1.  Nesting habits shape feeding preferences and predatory behavior in an ant genus.

Authors:  Alain Dejean; Nicolas Labrière; Axel Touchard; Frédéric Petitclerc; Olivier Roux
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2014-02-25

2.  The biological significance of lipogenesis in Nasonia vitripennis.

Authors:  Marie-Theres Multerer; Martina Wendler; Joachim Ruther
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 5.530

Review 3.  Extrafloral-nectar-based partner manipulation in plant-ant relationships.

Authors:  D A Grasso; C Pandolfi; N Bazihizina; D Nocentini; M Nepi; S Mancuso
Journal:  AoB Plants       Date:  2015-01-14       Impact factor: 3.276

4.  Temporal Variation in the Abundance and Richness of Foliage-Dwelling Ants Mediated by Extrafloral Nectar.

Authors:  Ceres Belchior; Sebastián F Sendoya; Kleber Del-Claro
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Effects of seed morphology and elaiosome chemical composition on attractiveness of five Trillium species to seed-dispersing ants.

Authors:  Chelsea N Miller; Susan R Whitehead; Charles Kwit
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2020-02-27       Impact factor: 2.912

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.