Literature DB >> 18543629

Density-mediated, context-dependent consumer-resource interactions between ants and extrafloral nectar plants.

Scott A Chamberlain1, J Nathaniel Holland.   

Abstract

Interspecific interactions are often mediated by the interplay between resource supply and consumer density. The supply of a resource and a consumer's density response to it may in turn yield context-dependent use of other resources. Such consumer-resource interactions occur not only for predator-prey and competitive interactions, but for mutualistic ones as well. For example, consumer-resource interactions between ants and extrafloral nectar (EFN) plants are often mutualistic, as EFN resources attract and reward ants which protect plants from herbivory. Yet, ants also commonly exploit floral resources, leading to antagonistic consumer-resource interactions by disrupting pollination and plant reproduction. EFN resources associated with mutualistic ant-plant interactions may also mediate antagonistic ant-flower interactions through the aggregative density response of ants on plants, which could either exacerbate ant-flower interactions or alternatively satiate and distract ants from floral resources. In this study, we examined how EFN resources mediate the density response of ants on senita cacti in the Sonoran Desert and their context-dependent use of floral resources. Removal of EFN resources reduced the aggregative density of ants on plants, both on hourly and daily time scales. Yet, the increased aggregative ant density on plants with EFN resources decreased rather than increased ant use of floral resources, including contacts with and time spent in flowers. Behavioral assays showed no confounding effect of floral deterrents on ant-flower interactions. Thus, ant use of floral resources depends on the supply of EFN resources, which mediates the potential for both mutualistic and antagonistic interactions by increasing the aggregative density of ants protecting plants, while concurrently distracting ants from floral resources. Nevertheless, only certain years and populations of study showed an increase in plant reproduction through herbivore protection or ant distraction from floral resources. Despite pronounced effects of EFN resources mediating the aggregative density of ants on plants and their context-dependent use of floral resources, consumer-resource interactions remained largely commensalistic.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18543629     DOI: 10.1890/07-1139.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecology        ISSN: 0012-9658            Impact factor:   5.499


  14 in total

1.  Do extrafloral nectar resources, species abundances, and body sizes contribute to the structure of ant-plant mutualistic networks?

Authors:  Scott A Chamberlain; Jeffrey R Kilpatrick; J Nathaniel Holland
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2010-06-06       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Trade-offs in an ant-plant-fungus mutualism.

Authors:  Jérôme Orivel; Pierre-Jean Malé; Jérémie Lauth; Olivier Roux; Frédéric Petitclerc; Alain Dejean; Céline Leroy
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Composition of extrafloral nectar influences interactions between the myrmecophyte Humboldtia brunonis and its ant associates.

Authors:  Megha Shenoy; Venkatesan Radhika; Suma Satish; Renee M Borges
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 2.626

4.  Defensive effects of extrafloral nectaries in quaking aspen differ with scale.

Authors:  Brent Mortensen; Diane Wagner; Patricia Doak
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2010-10-08       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Multitasking in a plant-ant interaction: how does Acacia myrtifolia manage both ants and pollinators?

Authors:  Angélica E Martínez-Bauer; Gerardo Cerón Martínez; Daniel J Murphy; Martin Burd
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Parental resource and offspring liability: the influence of extrafloral nectar on oviposition by a leaf-mining moth.

Authors:  Brent Mortensen; Diane Wagner; Patricia Doak
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2012-12-08       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Floral visitation by the Argentine ant reduces pollinator visitation and seed set in the coast barrel cactus, Ferocactus viridescens.

Authors:  Katherine E LeVan; Keng-Lou James Hung; Kyle R McCann; John T Ludka; David A Holway
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2013-07-28       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Sugary secretions of wasp galls: a want-to-be extrafloral nectar?

Authors:  Adriana Aranda-Rickert; Carolina Rothen; Patricia Diez; Ana María González; Brigitte Marazzi
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2017-11-10       Impact factor: 4.357

9.  Increased host investment in extrafloral nectar (EFN) improves the efficiency of a mutualistic defensive service.

Authors:  Marcia González-Teuber; Juan Carlos Silva Bueno; Martin Heil; Wilhelm Boland
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-04       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Ant-plant interaction in a tropical savanna: may the network structure vary over time and influence on the outcomes of associations?

Authors:  Denise Lange; Kleber Del-Claro
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.