| Literature DB >> 22233093 |
Patrick Ollitrault1, Javier Terol, Andres Garcia-Lor, Aurélie Bérard, Aurélie Chauveau, Yann Froelicher, Caroline Belzile, Raphaël Morillon, Luis Navarro, Dominique Brunel, Manuel Talon.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: With the increasing availability of EST databases and whole genome sequences, SNPs have become the most abundant and powerful polymorphic markers. However, SNP chip data generally suffers from ascertainment biases caused by the SNP discovery and selection process in which a small number of individuals are used as discovery panels. The ongoing International Citrus Genome Consortium sequencing project of the highly heterozygous Clementine and sweet orange genomes will soon result in the release of several hundred thousand SNPs. The primary goals of this study were: (i) to estimate the transferability within the genus Citrus of SNPs discovered from Clementine BACend sequencing (BES), (ii) to estimate bias associated with the very narrow discovery panel, and (iii) to evaluate the usefulness of the Clementine-derived SNP markers for diversity analysis and comparative mapping studies between the different cultivated Citrus species.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22233093 PMCID: PMC3320530 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-13-13
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Genomics ISSN: 1471-2164 Impact factor: 3.969
Figure 1Unexpected polymorphism distribution. (a, b, c and d): segregation for null allele in Chandler × Clementine (CxN) population; (a): 0BxAB segregation (C3); (b) 00 × AB segregation (C3); (c) 00 × 0A segregation (C4); (d, e and f): no segregation of Clementine gametes; (d): SNP polymorphism in germplasm (C5); (e): null allele polymorphism in germplasm (C6); (f) potential fixed heterozygosity (duplicated locus; C7). Orange dots: Nules Clementine, blue dots: pummelo germplasm including cv 'Chandler'; red dots: mandarin germplasm; yellow dots: citron germplasm; green dots: C × N progeny
Genetic diversity parameters for all loci without null allele (WONA; 506).
| MLGs | Ho | He | F | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 26.88 | 10 | 0.063+/-0.012 | 0.063+/-0.011 | ||
| 15.42 | 5 | 0.089+/-0.021 | 0.057+/-0.012 | ||
| 90.71 | 12 | 0.327+/-0.019 | 0.279+/-0.013 | ||
| 54.55 | 4 | 0.217+/-0.021 | 0.186+/-0.015 | ||
| 54.74 | 1 | 0.547+/-0.043 | 0.273+/-0.021 | ||
| 68.97 | 7 | 0.364+/-0.030 | 0.267+/-0.017 | ||
| 41.70 | 2 | 0.416+/-0.042 | 0.208+/-0.021 | ||
| 65.61 | 4 | 0.653+/-0.041 | 0.327+/-0.020 | ||
| Wild | 47.23 | 5 | 0.118+/-0.012 | 0.150+/-0.013 | |
| All samples (54) | 100.00 | 53 | 0.278+/-0.010 | 0.336+/-0.011 | 0.127+/-0.019 |
%LP: percentage of polymorphic loci, MLGs: number of multilocus genotypes differentiated; Ho: observed heterozygosity; He: Nei diversity; F: Wright fixation index
Comparison of diversity parameters for loci without null allele (WONA) homozygous (CHom; 30) or heterozygous (Chet; 476) in Clementine.
| Ho | He | F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHom | 16.67 | 0.036+/-0.031 | 0.042+/-0.039 | ||
| CHet | 27.52 | 0.065+/-0.012 | 0.064+/-0.011 | ||
| CHom | 20.00 | 0.061+/-0.057 | 0.047+/-0.038 | ||
| CHet | 15.13 | 0.091+/-0.022 | 0.057+/-0.013 | ||
| CHom | 56.67 | 0.166+/-0.075 | 0.161+/-0.062 | ||
| CHet | 92.86 | 0.337+/-0.019 | 0.286+/-0.013 | ||
| CHom | 66.67 | 0.366+/-0.128 | 0.295+/-0.064 | ||
| CHet | 53.78 | 0.208+/-0.021 | 0.179+/-0.015 | ||
| CHom | 43.33 | 0.433+/-0.180 | 0.216+/-0.090 | ||
| CHet | 55.46 | 0.554+/-0.044 | 0.277+/-0.022 | ||
| CHom | 80.00 | 0.579+/-0.136 | 0.378+/-0.068 | ||
| CHet | 68.28 | 0.351+/-0.031 | 0.259+/-0.017 | ||
| CHom | 63.33 | 0.633+/-0.175 | 0.316+/-0.087 | ||
| CHet | 40.34 | 0.402+/-0.044 | 0.201+/-0.022 | ||
| CHom | 36.67 | 0.358+/-0.172 | 0.182+/-0.087 | ||
| CHet | 67.44 | 0.671+/-0.042 | 0.336+/-0.021 | ||
| Wild | CHom | 26.67 | 0.068+/-0.044 | 0.200+/-0.064 | |
| CHet | 48.53 | 0.121+/-0.013 | 0.147+/-0.013 | ||
| All samples (54) | CHom | 100.00 | 0.239+/-0.035 | 0.403+/-0.024 | 0.405+/-0.081 |
| CHet | 100.00 | 0.280+/-0.010 | 0.331+/-0.012 | 0.109+/-0.019 |
%LP: percentage of polymorphic loci, Ho: observed heterozygosity; He: Nei diversity; F: Wright fixation index
Population organization parameters (Fstat) between and within the three basic taxa and differentiation between C.maxima and C. reticulata (Fst) evaluated with loci heterozygous (476) or Homozygous in Clementine (30).
| 3 basic taxa | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| All loci | -0.09+/-0.02 | 0.42+/-0.03 | 0.47+/-0.03 | 0.46+/-0.03 |
| Het. Cle. | -0.10+/-0.02 | 0.40+/-0.03 | 0.45+/-0.03 | 0.45+/-0.03 |
| Hom. Cle. | 0.012+/-0.14 | 0.80+/-0.10 | 0.80+/-0.08 | 0.70+/-0.11 |
Figure 2Cluster analysis (Neighbor Joining) of the accessions of . Loci heterozygous in Clementine (CHet; 476); b) Loci homozygous in Clementine (CHom; 30). Numbers near nodes are bootstrap values based on 1000 resamplings (only value > 60% are indicated).
Figure 3Principal component analysis from all loci without null alleles (506 loci). a) Axes 1/2 with all individual active. b) Positions of secondary species in the axis 1 of an ACP established from only C. reticulata and C. maxima as active accessions.
Figure 4Neighbor Joining Analysis based on all loci without null alleles (WONA; 506 loci). Numbers near nodes are bootstrap values based on 1000 resamplings (only value > 60% are indicated).
LD between 472 SNP loci within the Chandler × Nules progeny and germplasm samples.
| Average r2 | r2 > 0.2 | pvalue < 5% | pvalue < 1% | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chandler × Nules | 0.060 | 7015 (6.31%) | 12962 (11.66%) | 8488 (7.64%) |
| Germplasm | 0.152 | 29813 (26.82%) | 65758 (59.15%) | 49169 (44.23%) |
Diversity parameters for loci with null alleles (WNA)
| MLGs | GD | Null | Ho | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 41.38 | 10 | 0.145+/-0.036 | 0.609 | 0.037 | |
| 17.24 | 5 | 0.060+/-0.025 | 0.641 | 0.041 | |
| 80.17 | 12 | 0.361+/-0.040 | 0.111 | 0.234 | |
| 70.69 | 4 | 0.308+/-0.038 | 0.405 | 0.045 | |
| 15.52 | 2 | 0.004+/-0.008 | 0.103 | 0.151 | |
| 73.27 | 6 | 0.317+/-0.041 | 0.190 | 0.086 | |
| 8.62 | 1 | 0+/-0 | 0.224 | 0.086 | |
| 24.13 | 1 | 0/-0 | 0.086 | 0.241 | |
| Wild | 76.72 | 5 | 0.329+/-0.037 | 0.474 | 0.036 |
| All samples (54) | 100 | 47 | 0.546+/-0.021 | 0.326 | 0.121 |
%LP: percentage of polymorphic loci, MLGs: number of multilocus genotypes differentiated; GD: genotypic diversity; Null: average proportion of Homozygous for null allele; Ho: average proportion of observed heterozygous (2 different bases).
Figure 5Neighbor Joining Analysis based on SNP loci with null alleles (WNA; 116 loci). Numbers near nodes are bootstrap values based on 1000 resamplings (only value > 60% are indicated).
Mappable loci for comparative genetic mapping.
| Clem | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clementine | 36 | 13 | 67 | 51 | 13 | 58 | 6 | 26 | 2 | |
| 136 | 9 | 40 | 27 | 15 | 37 | 5 | 18 | 2 | ||
| 73 | 28 | 16 | 17 | 5 | 16 | 3 | 4 | 1 | ||
| 444 | 122 | 73 | 63 | 17 | 76 | 9 | 26 | 2 | ||
| 271 | 78 | 52 | 264 | 15 | 63 | 8 | 21 | 2 | ||
| 264 | 64 | 47 | 260 | 207 | 15 | 5 | 11 | 2 | ||
| 350 | 88 | 63 | 350 | 263 | 256 | 9 | 23 | 2 | ||
| 192 | 57 | 38 | 193 | 142 | 139 | 171 | 7 | 1 | ||
| 321 | 101 | 49 | 301 | 216 | 208 | 269 | 192 | 2 | ||
| 14 | 6 | 6 | 15 | 13 | 11 | 13 | 10 | 10 | ||
| Total WONA | 476 | 141 | 79 | 461 | 295 | 277 | 375 | 211 | 332 | 15 |
| Total WNA | 91 | 48 | 20 | 93 | 82 | 18 | 85 | 10 | 29 | 2 |
Above the diagonal, loci with null alleles (WNA) polymorphic within each species; below the diagonal, loci without null alleles (WONA) polymorphic within each species; diagonal in bold, total number of loci mappable in one species (both WNA and WONA).
Figure 6Hypothesis on the origin of some secondary .