Literature DB >> 11697922

The diversification of Citrus clementina Hort. ex Tan., a vegetatively propagated crop species.

M P Bretó1, C Ruiz, J A Pina, M J Asíns.   

Abstract

Clementines, due to their high quality, are one of the most important cultivated citrus mandarins. As in the case of sweet orange and satsuma mandarins, genetic variability within this species is minimal when analyzed by molecular markers, because the existing varieties have not been obtained through hybridization, but through the selection of spontaneous mutations affecting traits of agronomic interest. This would explain, at least in part, the greater diversity for agronomic traits when compared to the variability for molecular markers. Another possible (nonexclusive) reason is that the types of molecular marker used are not focused on the kind of molecular change mainly involved in the origination of new clementine cultivars; i.e., are all sources of variation equally involved in the diversification of these plants? To answer this question, different kinds of markers based on primers of random sequence, simple sequence repeats, and retrotransposon sequences that may reveal point mutations, and somatic recombination and transposon activity, respectively, were used to compare the level of variability among 24 clementine varieties. Their ISSR, RAPD, and AFLP analysis provided only two polymorphic bands, distinguishing just two varieties. No variability was found by SSRs, i.e., no new allele arising through somatic recombination was detected. Instead, the amplification of sequences adjacent to retrotransposons yielded a higher number of polymorphisms (14.6 vs 2.4% for the previous mentioned marker types). Two geographical distant groups, one from North Africa and the other from Spain, have evolved in agreement with polymorphisms based on IRAP markers anchored to, at least, two different Copia-like retrotransposon sequences. Therefore, this study suggests that the DNA of this type of mobile elements is evolving faster than the DNA of other markers in this clonal lineage. Copyright 2001 Academic Press.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11697922     DOI: 10.1006/mpev.2001.1008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol        ISSN: 1055-7903            Impact factor:   4.286


  25 in total

1.  Comparative use of InDel and SSR markers in deciphering the interspecific structure of cultivated citrus genetic diversity: a perspective for genetic association studies.

Authors:  Andrés García-Lor; François Luro; Luis Navarro; Patrick Ollitrault
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics       Date:  2011-12-11       Impact factor: 3.291

2.  Genetic diversity amongst landraces of a dioecious vegetatively propagated plant, betelvine (Piper betle L.).

Authors:  Anjali Verma; Nikhil Kumar; S A Ranade
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 1.826

Review 3.  Analysis of plant diversity with retrotransposon-based molecular markers.

Authors:  R Kalendar; A J Flavell; T H N Ellis; T Sjakste; C Moisy; A H Schulman
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 3.821

4.  Polyembryony in non-apomictic citrus genotypes.

Authors:  Pablo Aleza; José Juárez; Patrick Ollitrault; Luis Navarro
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2010-07-30       Impact factor: 4.357

5.  Retrotransposon characterisation and fingerprinting of apple clones by S-SAP markers.

Authors:  S Venturi; L Dondini; P Donini; S Sansavini
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2005-11-17       Impact factor: 5.699

6.  Genomic analysis of Grapevine Retrotransposon 1 (Gret 1) in Vitis vinifera.

Authors:  H Sofia Pereira; Augusta Barão; Margarida Delgado; Leonor Morais-Cecílio; Wanda Viegas
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2005-10-18       Impact factor: 5.699

7.  Assessing genetic diversity and population structure in a citrus germplasm collection utilizing simple sequence repeat markers (SSRs).

Authors:  Noelle A Barkley; Mikeal L Roose; Robert R Krueger; Claire T Federici
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2006-04-20       Impact factor: 5.699

8.  DNA fingerprinting in botany: past, present, future.

Authors:  Hilde Nybom; Kurt Weising; Björn Rotter
Journal:  Investig Genet       Date:  2014-01-03

9.  An extensive study of the genetic diversity within seven French wine grape variety collections.

Authors:  Frédérique Pelsy; Stéphanie Hocquigny; Ximena Moncada; Gérard Barbeau; Dominique Forget; Patricio Hinrichsen; Didier Merdinoglu
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 5.699

Review 10.  Useful parasites: the evolutionary biology and biotechnology applications of transposable elements.

Authors:  Georgi N Bonchev
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 1.166

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.