Literature DB >> 22232278

Synergistic activity of ceftobiprole and vancomycin in a rat model of infective endocarditis caused by methicillin-resistant and glycopeptide-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus.

Jeffrey Fernandez1, Darren Abbanat, Wenchi Shang, Wenping He, Karen Amsler, James Hastings, Anne Marie Queenan, John L Melton, Alfred M Barron, Robert K Flamm, A Simon Lynch.   

Abstract

The therapeutic activity of ceftobiprole medocaril, the prodrug of ceftobiprole, was compared to that of vancomycin, daptomycin, and the combination of a subtherapeutic dose of ceftobiprole and vancomycin in a rat model of infective endocarditis due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) (ATCC 43300) or glycopeptide-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus (GISA) (NRS4 and HIP 5836) strains. The minimum bactericidal concentrations of ceftobiprole, vancomycin, and daptomycin at bacterial cell densities similar to those encountered in the cardiac vegetation in the rat endocarditis model were 2, >64, and 8 μg/ml, respectively, for MRSA ATCC 43300 and 4, >64, and 8 μg/ml, respectively, for the GISA strain. Ceftobiprole medocaril administered in doses of 100 mg/kg of body weight given intravenously (i.v.) twice a day (BID) every 8 h (q8h) (equivalent to a human therapeutic dose of ceftobiprole [500 mg given three times a day [TID]) was the most effective monotherapy, eradicating nearly 5 log(10) CFU/g MRSA or 6 log(10) CFU/g GISA organisms from the cardiac vegetation and had the highest incidence of sterile vegetation compared to the other monotherapies in the endocarditis model. In in vitro time-kill studies, synergistic effects were observed with ceftobiprole and vancomycin on MRSA and GISA strains, and in vivo synergy was noted with combinations of subtherapeutic doses of these agents for the same strains. Additionally, sterile vegetations were achieved in 33 and 60%, respectively, of the animals infected with MRSA ATCC 43300 or GISA NRS4 receiving ceftobiprole-vancomycin combination therapy. In summary, ceftobiprole was efficacious both as monotherapy and in combination with vancomycin in treating MRSA and GISA infections in a rat infective endocarditis model and warrants further evaluation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22232278      PMCID: PMC3294932          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.06057-11

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  58 in total

1.  Combined effects of vancomycin and imipenem against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  K Totsuka; M Shiseki; K Kikuchi; Y Matsui
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 5.790

Review 2.  In vivo antibiotic synergism: contribution of animal models.

Authors:  B Fantin; C Carbon
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  In vivo synergism of ceftobiprole and vancomycin against experimental endocarditis due to vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  J M Entenza; T R Veloso; J Vouillamoz; M Giddey; P Majcherczyk; P Moreillon
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2011-07-05       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Impact of high-inoculum Staphylococcus aureus on the activities of nafcillin, vancomycin, linezolid, and daptomycin, alone and in combination with gentamicin, in an in vitro pharmacodynamic model.

Authors:  Kerry L LaPlante; Michael J Rybak
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 5.  Vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: a new model of antibiotic resistance.

Authors:  K Hiramatsu
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 25.071

6.  Correlation of antibiotic synergy in vitro and in vivo: use of an animal model of neutropenic gram-negative sepsis.

Authors:  E G Chadwick; S T Shulman; R Yogev
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 5.226

7.  Pharmacodynamic activity of ceftobiprole compared with vancomycin versus methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus (VISA) and vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (VRSA) using an in vitro model.

Authors:  George G Zhanel; Dylan Voth; Kim Nichol; James A Karlowsky; Ayman M Noreddin; Daryl J Hoban
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2009-05-19       Impact factor: 5.790

8.  The rate of bactericidal action of penicillin in vitro as a function of its concentration, and its paradoxically reduced activity at high concentrations against certain organisms.

Authors:  H EAGLE; A D MUSSELMAN
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1948-07       Impact factor: 14.307

9.  Vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in the absence of vancomycin exposure.

Authors:  Cynthia J Whitener; Sarah Y Park; Fred A Browne; Leslie J Parent; Kathleen Julian; Bulent Bozdogan; Peter C Appelbaum; Jasmine Chaitram; Linda M Weigel; John Jernigan; Linda K McDougal; Fred C Tenover; Scott K Fridkin
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2004-03-24       Impact factor: 9.079

10.  Ceftobiprole is superior to vancomycin, daptomycin, and linezolid for treatment of experimental endocarditis in rabbits caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  P Tattevin; L Basuino; D Bauer; B A Diep; H F Chambers
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2009-11-16       Impact factor: 5.191

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Ceftobiprole medocaril: a review of its use in patients with hospital- or community-acquired pneumonia.

Authors:  Yahiya Y Syed
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 9.546

2.  Efficacy of Telavancin Alone and in Combination with Ampicillin in a Rat Model of Enterococcus faecalis Endocarditis.

Authors:  Truc T Tran; Vincent H Tam; Barbara E Murray; Cesar A Arias; Kavindra V Singh
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 3.  Ceftobripole: Experience in staphylococcal bacteremia.

Authors:  A Soriano; L Morata
Journal:  Rev Esp Quimioter       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 1.553

4.  Ceftobiprole versus daptomycin in Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: a novel protocol for a double-blind, Phase III trial.

Authors:  Kamal Hamed; Marc Engelhardt; Mark E Jones; Mikael Saulay; Thomas L Holland; Harald Seifert; Vance G Fowler
Journal:  Future Microbiol       Date:  2020-01-10       Impact factor: 3.165

Review 5.  Ceftobiprole Perspective: Current and Potential Future Indications.

Authors:  Tommaso Lupia; Carlo Pallotto; Silvia Corcione; Lucio Boglione; Francesco Giuseppe De Rosa
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-08

6.  CAMERA2 - combination antibiotic therapy for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Steven Y C Tong; Jane Nelson; David L Paterson; Vance G Fowler; Benjamin P Howden; Allen C Cheng; Mark Chatfield; Jeffrey Lipman; Sebastian Van Hal; Matthew O'Sullivan; James O Robinson; Dafna Yahav; David Lye; Joshua S Davis
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 2.279

7.  Antimicrobial activity of geranium oil against clinical strains of Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Monika Bigos; Małgorzata Wasiela; Danuta Kalemba; Monika Sienkiewicz
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 4.411

8.  Synergistic effect of vancomycin combined with cefotaxime, imipenem, or meropenem against Staphylococcus aureus with reduced susceptibility to vancomycin

Authors:  Arpasiri Srisrattakarn; Chonthicha Chaiyapoke; Sirikarn Booncharoen; Sujintana Wongthong; Aroonwadee Chanawong; Patcharaporn Tippayawat; Ratree Tavichakorntrakool; Aroonlug Lulitanond
Journal:  Turk J Med Sci       Date:  2021-08-30       Impact factor: 0.973

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.