BACKGROUND: Estrogens are recognized causal factors in breast cancer. Interindividual variation in estrogen metabolism may also influence the risk of breast cancer and could provide clues to mechanisms of breast carcinogenesis. Long-standing hypotheses about how estrogen metabolism might influence breast cancer have not been adequately evaluated in epidemiological studies because of the lack of accurate, reproducible, and high-throughput assays for estrogen metabolites. METHODS: We conducted a prospective case-control study nested within the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial (PLCO). Participants included 277 women who developed invasive breast cancer (case subjects) and 423 matched control subjects; at PLCO baseline, all subjects were aged 55-74 years, postmenopausal and not using hormone therapy, and provided a blood sample. Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry was used to measure serum concentrations of 15 estrogens and estrogen metabolites, in unconjugated and conjugated forms, including the parent estrogens, estrone and estradiol, and estrogen metabolites in pathways defined by irreversible hydroxylation at the C-2, C-4, or C-16 positions of the steroid ring. We calculated hazard ratios (HRs) approximating risk in highest vs lowest deciles of individual estrogens and estrogen metabolites, estrogens and estrogen metabolites grouped by metabolic pathways, and metabolic pathway ratios using multivariable Cox proportional hazards models. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: Nearly all estrogens, estrogen metabolites, and metabolic pathway groups were associated with an increased risk of breast cancer; the serum concentration of unconjugated estradiol was strongly associated with the risk of breast cancer (HR = 2.07, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.19 to 3.62). No estrogen, estrogen metabolite, or metabolic pathway group remained statistically significantly associated with the risk of breast cancer after adjusting for unconjugated estradiol. The ratio of the 2-hydroxylation pathway to parent estrogens (HR = 0.66, 95% CI = 0.51 to 0.87) and the ratio of 4-hydroxylation pathway catechols to 4-hydroxylation pathway methylated catechols (HR = 1.34, 95% CI = 1.04 to 1.72) were statistically significantly associated with the risk of breast cancer and remained so after adjustment for unconjugated estradiol. CONCLUSIONS: More extensive 2-hydroxylation of parent estrogens is associated with lower risk, and less extensive methylation of potentially genotoxic 4-hydroxylation pathway catechols is associated with higher risk of postmenopausal breast cancer.
BACKGROUND: Estrogens are recognized causal factors in breast cancer. Interindividual variation in estrogen metabolism may also influence the risk of breast cancer and could provide clues to mechanisms of breast carcinogenesis. Long-standing hypotheses about how estrogen metabolism might influence breast cancer have not been adequately evaluated in epidemiological studies because of the lack of accurate, reproducible, and high-throughput assays for estrogen metabolites. METHODS: We conducted a prospective case-control study nested within the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial (PLCO). Participants included 277 women who developed invasive breast cancer (case subjects) and 423 matched control subjects; at PLCO baseline, all subjects were aged 55-74 years, postmenopausal and not using hormone therapy, and provided a blood sample. Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry was used to measure serum concentrations of 15 estrogens and estrogen metabolites, in unconjugated and conjugated forms, including the parent estrogens, estrone and estradiol, and estrogen metabolites in pathways defined by irreversible hydroxylation at the C-2, C-4, or C-16 positions of the steroid ring. We calculated hazard ratios (HRs) approximating risk in highest vs lowest deciles of individual estrogens and estrogen metabolites, estrogens and estrogen metabolites grouped by metabolic pathways, and metabolic pathway ratios using multivariable Cox proportional hazards models. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: Nearly all estrogens, estrogen metabolites, and metabolic pathway groups were associated with an increased risk of breast cancer; the serum concentration of unconjugated estradiol was strongly associated with the risk of breast cancer (HR = 2.07, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.19 to 3.62). No estrogen, estrogen metabolite, or metabolic pathway group remained statistically significantly associated with the risk of breast cancer after adjusting for unconjugated estradiol. The ratio of the 2-hydroxylation pathway to parent estrogens (HR = 0.66, 95% CI = 0.51 to 0.87) and the ratio of 4-hydroxylation pathway catechols to 4-hydroxylation pathway methylated catechols (HR = 1.34, 95% CI = 1.04 to 1.72) were statistically significantly associated with the risk of breast cancer and remained so after adjustment for unconjugated estradiol. CONCLUSIONS: More extensive 2-hydroxylation of parent estrogens is associated with lower risk, and less extensive methylation of potentially genotoxic 4-hydroxylation pathway catechols is associated with higher risk of postmenopausal breast cancer.
Authors: D Chakravarti; P C Mailander; K M Li; S Higginbotham; H L Zhang; M L Gross; J L Meza; E L Cavalieri; E G Rogan Journal: Oncogene Date: 2001-11-29 Impact factor: 9.867
Authors: Jay H Fowke; Dai Qi; H Leon Bradlow; Xiao Ou Shu; Yu Tang Gao; Jin Rong Cheng; Fan Jin; Wei Zheng Journal: Steroids Date: 2003-01 Impact factor: 2.668
Authors: P Muti; H L Bradlow; A Micheli; V Krogh; J L Freudenheim; H J Schünemann; M Stanulla; J Yang; D W Sepkovic; M Trevisan; F Berrino Journal: Epidemiology Date: 2000-11 Impact factor: 4.822
Authors: Rowan T Chlebowski; Garnet L Anderson; Margery Gass; Dorothy S Lane; Aaron K Aragaki; Lewis H Kuller; JoAnn E Manson; Marcia L Stefanick; Judith Ockene; Gloria E Sarto; Karen C Johnson; Jean Wactawski-Wende; Peter M Ravdin; Robert Schenken; Susan L Hendrix; Aleksandar Rajkovic; Thomas E Rohan; Shagufta Yasmeen; Ross L Prentice Journal: JAMA Date: 2010-10-20 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Federico Canzian; David G Cox; V Wendy Setiawan; Daniel O Stram; Regina G Ziegler; Laure Dossus; Lars Beckmann; Hélène Blanché; Aurelio Barricarte; Christine D Berg; Sheila Bingham; Julie Buring; Saundra S Buys; Eugenia E Calle; Stephen J Chanock; Françoise Clavel-Chapelon; John Oliver L DeLancey; W Ryan Diver; Miren Dorronsoro; Christopher A Haiman; Göran Hallmans; Susan E Hankinson; David J Hunter; Anika Hüsing; Claudine Isaacs; Kay-Tee Khaw; Laurence N Kolonel; Peter Kraft; Loïc Le Marchand; Eiliv Lund; Kim Overvad; Salvatore Panico; Petra H M Peeters; Michael Pollak; Michael J Thun; Anne Tjønneland; Dimitrios Trichopoulos; Rosario Tumino; Meredith Yeager; Robert N Hoover; Elio Riboli; Gilles Thomas; Brian E Henderson; Rudolf Kaaks; Heather Spencer Feigelson Journal: Hum Mol Genet Date: 2010-07-15 Impact factor: 6.150
Authors: Jane A Cauley; Joseph M Zmuda; Michelle E Danielson; Britt-Marie Ljung; Douglas C Bauer; Steven R Cummings; Lewis H Kuller Journal: Epidemiology Date: 2003-11 Impact factor: 4.822
Authors: Cher M Dallal; Jeffrey A Tice; Diana S M Buist; Douglas C Bauer; James V Lacey; Jane A Cauley; Trisha F Hue; Andrea Lacroix; Roni T Falk; Ruth M Pfeiffer; Barbara J Fuhrman; Timothy D Veenstra; Xia Xu; Louise A Brinton Journal: Carcinogenesis Date: 2013-11-08 Impact factor: 4.944
Authors: Mark A Guinter; Alexander C McLain; Anwar T Merchant; Dale P Sandler; Susan E Steck Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2018-04-12 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Alan A Arslan; Karen L Koenig; Per Lenner; Yelena Afanasyeva; Roy E Shore; Yu Chen; Eva Lundin; Paolo Toniolo; Göran Hallmans; Anne Zeleniuch-Jacquotte Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2014-04-27 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Cynthia A Thomson; H H Sherry Chow; Betsy C Wertheim; Denise J Roe; Alison Stopeck; Gertraud Maskarinec; Maria Altbach; Pavani Chalasani; Chuan Huang; Meghan B Strom; Jean-Philippe Galons; Patricia A Thompson Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2017-05-30 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Steven C Moore; Charles E Matthews; Xiao Ou Shu; Kai Yu; Mitchell H Gail; Xia Xu; Bu-Tian Ji; Wong-Ho Chow; Qiuyin Cai; Honglan Li; Gong Yang; David Ruggieri; Jennifer Boyd-Morin; Nathaniel Rothman; Robert N Hoover; Yu-Tang Gao; Wei Zheng; Regina G Ziegler Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2016-05-18 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Louise A Brinton; Britton Trabert; Garnet L Anderson; Roni T Falk; Ashley S Felix; Barbara J Fuhrman; Margery L Gass; Lewis H Kuller; Ruth M Pfeiffer; Thomas E Rohan; Howard D Strickler; Xia Xu; Nicolas Wentzensen Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2016-04-12 Impact factor: 4.254