BACKGROUND: Women who metabolize a large proportion of their estrogen via the 16alpha hydroxylation pathway could be at a higher risk of breast cancer. The objective of this study was to test the hypothesis that serum concentrations of 2-hydroxyestrone (2-OHE1) and 16alpha-hydroxyestrone (16alpha-OHE1), as well as their ratio, predict the risk of breast cancer in older women. METHODS: We performed a case-cohort study of 272 women with confirmed incident breast cancer and 291 controls chosen randomly from the cohort. Estrogen metabolites were measured in serum collected at the baseline examination and stored at -120 degrees C. Incident breast cancers were confirmed by medical records and pathology reports during an average follow-up of 8.7 years. RESULTS: Mean concentrations of 2-OHE1 and 16alpha-OHE1, adjusted for age and body mass index, were 3% to 4% higher in cases compared with controls: 2-OHE1 was 176 pg/mL and 169 pg/mL and 16alpha-OHE1 was 233 pg/mL and 226 pg/mL in cases and controls, respectively. There was, however, no difference in the ratio of 2-OHE1 to 16alpha-OHE1. The risk of breast cancer in women with the highest quartile of this ratio compared with those in the lowest quartile was 1.17 (95% confidence interval = 0.73-1.87). CONCLUSION: The study results do not support the hypothesis that the ratio of 2-OHE1 to 16alpha-OHE1 predicts breast cancer risk.
BACKGROUND:Women who metabolize a large proportion of their estrogen via the 16alpha hydroxylation pathway could be at a higher risk of breast cancer. The objective of this study was to test the hypothesis that serum concentrations of 2-hydroxyestrone (2-OHE1) and 16alpha-hydroxyestrone (16alpha-OHE1), as well as their ratio, predict the risk of breast cancer in older women. METHODS: We performed a case-cohort study of 272 women with confirmed incident breast cancer and 291 controls chosen randomly from the cohort. Estrogen metabolites were measured in serum collected at the baseline examination and stored at -120 degrees C. Incident breast cancers were confirmed by medical records and pathology reports during an average follow-up of 8.7 years. RESULTS: Mean concentrations of 2-OHE1 and 16alpha-OHE1, adjusted for age and body mass index, were 3% to 4% higher in cases compared with controls: 2-OHE1 was 176 pg/mL and 169 pg/mL and 16alpha-OHE1 was 233 pg/mL and 226 pg/mL in cases and controls, respectively. There was, however, no difference in the ratio of 2-OHE1 to 16alpha-OHE1. The risk of breast cancer in women with the highest quartile of this ratio compared with those in the lowest quartile was 1.17 (95% confidence interval = 0.73-1.87). CONCLUSION: The study results do not support the hypothesis that the ratio of 2-OHE1 to 16alpha-OHE1 predicts breast cancer risk.
Authors: A Heather Eliassen; Donna Spiegelman; Xia Xu; Larry K Keefer; Timothy D Veenstra; Robert L Barbieri; Walter C Willett; Susan E Hankinson; Regina G Ziegler Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2011-12-05 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Cher M Dallal; Jeffrey A Tice; Diana S M Buist; Douglas C Bauer; James V Lacey; Jane A Cauley; Trisha F Hue; Andrea Lacroix; Roni T Falk; Ruth M Pfeiffer; Barbara J Fuhrman; Timothy D Veenstra; Xia Xu; Louise A Brinton Journal: Carcinogenesis Date: 2013-11-08 Impact factor: 4.944
Authors: Alan A Arslan; Karen L Koenig; Per Lenner; Yelena Afanasyeva; Roy E Shore; Yu Chen; Eva Lundin; Paolo Toniolo; Göran Hallmans; Anne Zeleniuch-Jacquotte Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2014-04-27 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Rachel H Mackey; Theresa J Fanelli; Francesmary Modugno; Jane A Cauley; Kathleen M McTigue; Maria Mori Brooks; Rowan T Chlebowski; JoAnn E Manson; Thomas L Klug; Kevin E Kip; J David Curb; Lewis H Kuller Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2012-08-29 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Steven C Moore; Charles E Matthews; Xiao Ou Shu; Kai Yu; Mitchell H Gail; Xia Xu; Bu-Tian Ji; Wong-Ho Chow; Qiuyin Cai; Honglan Li; Gong Yang; David Ruggieri; Jennifer Boyd-Morin; Nathaniel Rothman; Robert N Hoover; Yu-Tang Gao; Wei Zheng; Regina G Ziegler Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2016-05-18 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: A Heather Eliassen; Stacey A Missmer; Shelley S Tworoger; Susan E Hankinson Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2008-08 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: A Heather Eliassen; Regina G Ziegler; Bernard Rosner; Timothy D Veenstra; John M Roman; Xia Xu; Susan E Hankinson Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2009-10-20 Impact factor: 4.254