Literature DB >> 2223198

Possible factors affecting response to postal questionnaires: findings from a study of general practitioner services.

A Jacoby1.   

Abstract

Poor response rates affect the validity of results from postal questionnaires. The effect of three controllable factors upon response rates was examined in a recent study of patients' experiences and views of general practitioner services. The factors studied were the institution from which questionnaires were dispatched, the length of the questionnaire and the inclusion of a potentially sensitive question about ethnic origin. Questionnaires sent out by local Family Practitioner Committees were more likely to be returned than those sent out by a London-based independent research unit, but there were no differences in the nature of replies obtained. Neither the length of the questionnaire nor the inclusion of the potentially sensitive question affected response rates. The results of the study indicate that Family Practitioner Committees wishing to carry out postal surveys of users of general practitioner services can obtain satisfactory response rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2223198     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubmed.a042530

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Public Health Med        ISSN: 0957-4832


  8 in total

1.  What can you ask about? The effect on response to a postal screen of asking about two potentially sensitive questions.

Authors:  J Windsor
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 3.710

2.  Does requesting sensitive information on postal questionnaires have an impact on response rates? A randomised controlled trial in the south west of England.

Authors:  T J Peters; I M Harvey; M O Bachmann; J I Eachus
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 3.710

3.  A randomised controlled trial of postal versus interviewer administration of a questionnaire measuring satisfaction with, and use of, services received in the year before death.

Authors:  J Addington-Hall; L Walker; C Jones; S Karlsen; M McCarthy
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 3.710

4.  The use of family health services authority registers as a sampling frame in the UK: a review of theory and practice.

Authors:  H R Roberts; L Rushton; K R Muir; R Dengler; C A Coupland; C M Jenkinson; A Ruffell; C E Chilvers
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 3.710

5.  The feasibility of using a postal survey method to assess the health and development of 7 year old children of different birth weight.

Authors:  F Alderdice; T Petty; A Johnson; A Macfarlane
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 3.710

6.  Response rates to a mailed survey of a representative sample of cancer patients randomly drawn from the Pennsylvania Cancer Registry: a randomized trial of incentive and length effects.

Authors:  Bridget J Kelly; Taressa K Fraze; Robert C Hornik
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2010-07-14       Impact factor: 4.615

Review 7.  Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires.

Authors:  Philip James Edwards; Ian Roberts; Mike J Clarke; Carolyn Diguiseppi; Reinhard Wentz; Irene Kwan; Rachel Cooper; Lambert M Felix; Sarah Pratap
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2009-07-08

8.  The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of telephone triage of patients requesting same day consultations in general practice: study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial comparing nurse-led and GP-led management systems (ESTEEM).

Authors:  John L Campbell; Nicky Britten; Colin Green; Tim A Holt; Valerie Lattimer; Suzanne H Richards; David A Richards; Chris Salisbury; Rod S Taylor; Emily Fletcher
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2013-01-04       Impact factor: 2.279

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.