Literature DB >> 1573368

What can you ask about? The effect on response to a postal screen of asking about two potentially sensitive questions.

J Windsor1.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: The purpose was to determine whether asking about ethnic origin and housing tenure in a postal survey affects the response rate.
DESIGN: The study derived from a postal survey designed to determine eligibility for a study of outpatients. A two way factorial design was used to look at the two experimental factors, questionnaires being randomly divided into four groups with or without questions about ethnic origin and housing tenure. PARTICIPANTS: 10,000 people (1000 from each of 10 areas) were systematically sampled from electoral registers, the areas being chosen to give a nationally representative sample. MAIN
RESULTS: The response rate was 66% irrespective of whether ethnic origin was asked about, but was 65% and 67% respectively to questionnaires with and without questions about housing tenure.
CONCLUSIONS: Asking about ethnic origin did not affect the overall response to this survey although it is possible that the response from some ethnic minority groups was lower. Asking about housing tenure slightly, but significantly, decreased response.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1573368      PMCID: PMC1059500          DOI: 10.1136/jech.46.1.83

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health        ISSN: 0143-005X            Impact factor:   3.710


  10 in total

1.  Possible factors affecting response to postal questionnaires: findings from a study of general practitioner services.

Authors:  A Jacoby
Journal:  J Public Health Med       Date:  1990

Review 2.  The measurement of social class in epidemiology.

Authors:  P Liberatos; B G Link; J L Kelsey
Journal:  Epidemiol Rev       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 6.222

3.  Interviews or postal questionnaires? Comparisons of data about women's experiences with maternity services.

Authors:  A Cartwright
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 4.911

4.  Identifying a sample of elderly people by a postal screen.

Authors:  A Cartwright; C Smith
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 10.668

5.  Accidents in the home among children under 5: ethnic differences or social disadvantage?

Authors:  R Alwash; M McCarthy
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1988-05-21

6.  Social class analysis--an embarrassment to epidemiology.

Authors:  I G Jones; D Cameron
Journal:  Community Med       Date:  1984-02

7.  A comparison of mail, telephone, and home interview strategies for household health surveys.

Authors:  J Siemiatycki
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Who else responds to postal questionnaires? Are those involved in the subject of the study more likely to do so?

Authors:  A Cartwright; J Windsor
Journal:  Community Med       Date:  1989-11

9.  Social class, life expectancy and overall mortality.

Authors:  A Antonovsky
Journal:  Milbank Mem Fund Q       Date:  1967-04

Review 10.  Health of British Asians; a research review.

Authors:  W I Ahmad; E E Kernohan; M R Baker
Journal:  Community Med       Date:  1989-02
  10 in total
  2 in total

1.  Does requesting sensitive information on postal questionnaires have an impact on response rates? A randomised controlled trial in the south west of England.

Authors:  T J Peters; I M Harvey; M O Bachmann; J I Eachus
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 3.710

Review 2.  Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires.

Authors:  Philip James Edwards; Ian Roberts; Mike J Clarke; Carolyn Diguiseppi; Reinhard Wentz; Irene Kwan; Rachel Cooper; Lambert M Felix; Sarah Pratap
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2009-07-08
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.