Literature DB >> 22229706

Monitoring the effective population size of a brown bear (Ursus arctos) population using new single-sample approaches.

Tomaž Skrbinšek1, Maja Jelenčič, Lisette Waits, Ivan Kos, Klemen Jerina, Peter Trontelj.   

Abstract

The effective population size (N(e) ) could be the ideal parameter for monitoring populations of conservation concern as it conveniently summarizes both the evolutionary potential of the population and its sensitivity to genetic stochasticity. However, tracing its change through time is difficult in natural populations. We applied four new methods for estimating N(e) from a single sample of genotypes to trace temporal change in N(e) for bears in the Northern Dinaric Mountains. We genotyped 510 bears using 20 microsatellite loci and determined their age. The samples were organized into cohorts with regard to the year when the animals were born and yearly samples with age categories for every year when they were alive. We used the Estimator by Parentage Assignment (EPA) to directly estimate both N(e) and generation interval for each yearly sample. For cohorts, we estimated the effective number of breeders (N(b) ) using linkage disequilibrium, sibship assignment and approximate Bayesian computation methods and extrapolated these estimates to N(e) using the generation interval. The N(e) estimate by EPA is 276 (183-350 95% CI), meeting the inbreeding-avoidance criterion of N(e) > 50 but short of the long-term minimum viable population goal of N(e) > 500. The results obtained by the other methods are highly consistent with this result, and all indicate a rapid increase in N(e) probably in the late 1990s and early 2000s. The new single-sample approaches to the estimation of N(e) provide efficient means for including N(e) in monitoring frameworks and will be of great importance for future management and conservation.
© 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22229706     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05423.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Ecol        ISSN: 0962-1083            Impact factor:   6.185


  16 in total

1.  Genetic monitoring reveals temporal stability over 30 years in a small, lake-resident brown trout population.

Authors:  J Charlier; L Laikre; N Ryman
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 3.821

2.  History-driven population structure and asymmetric gene flow in a recovering large carnivore at the rear-edge of its European range.

Authors:  A A Karamanlidis; T Skrbinšek; M de Gabriel Hernando; L Krambokoukis; V Munoz-Fuentes; Z Bailey; C Nowak; A V Stronen
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2017-12-11       Impact factor: 3.821

3.  Long-term effective population size dynamics of an intensively monitored vertebrate population.

Authors:  A-K Mueller; N Chakarov; O Krüger; J I Hoffman
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 3.821

4.  Effective number of breeders, effective population size and their relationship with census size in an iteroparous species, Salvelinus fontinalis.

Authors:  Daniel E Ruzzante; Gregory R McCracken; Samantha Parmelee; Kristen Hill; Amelia Corrigan; John MacMillan; Sandra J Walde
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-01-27       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Using a reference population yardstick to calibrate and compare genetic diversity reported in different studies: an example from the brown bear.

Authors:  T Skrbinšek; M Jelenčič; L P Waits; H Potočnik; I Kos; P Trontelj
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 3.821

6.  Effects of overlapping generations on linkage disequilibrium estimates of effective population size.

Authors:  Robin S Waples; Tiago Antao; Gordon Luikart
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2014-04-08       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 7.  Challenges in analysis and interpretation of microsatellite data for population genetic studies.

Authors:  Alexander I Putman; Ignazio Carbone
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2014-10-30       Impact factor: 2.912

8.  Genetic and demographic recovery of an isolated population of brown bear Ursus arctos L., 1758.

Authors:  Elena G Gonzalez; Juan C Blanco; Fernando Ballesteros; Lourdes Alcaraz; Guillermo Palomero; Ignacio Doadrio
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 2.984

9.  Contemporary effective population and metapopulation size (N e and meta-N e): comparison among three salmonids inhabiting a fragmented system and differing in gene flow and its asymmetries.

Authors:  Daniel Gomez-Uchida; Friso P Palstra; Thomas W Knight; Daniel E Ruzzante
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 2.912

10.  Can genetic estimators provide robust estimates of the effective number of breeders in small populations?

Authors:  Marion Hoehn; Bernd Gruber; Stephen D Sarre; Rebecca Lange; Klaus Henle
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-06       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.