Literature DB >> 22229245

Analysis of the concordance in the EGFR pathway status between primary tumors and related metastases of colorectal cancer patients:implications for cancer therapy.

P Cejas1, M López-Gómez, C Aguayo, R Madero, J Moreno-Rubio, J de Castro Carpeño, C Belda-Iniesta, J Barriuso, V Moreno García, E Díaz, E Burgos, M Gonzalez-Barón, J Feliu.   

Abstract

Patients with metastatic Colorectal Cancer (mCRC), in which primary tumors are KRAS mutated, have no response to anti-EGFR therapy. However, less than half of mCRC patients with KRAS wild-type primary tumors respond to anti-EGFR therapy. Other downstream effectors of the EGFR pathway are being analyzed to fine-tune KRAS predictive value. However, as the primary tumor is the tissue of analysis that determines the use of anti-EGFR therapy in advanced disease, a high concordance in the status of these effectors between primary tumors and related metastases is required. We analyzed the concordances of downstream EGFR effectors in tumoral pairs of primaries and related metastases in a series of KRAS wild-type patients. One hundred seventeen tumoral pairs from patients with CRC were tested for KRAS mutational status. The level of concordance in the presence of KRAS mutations was 91% between the primary tumor and related metastases. The 70 pairs with KRAS wild-type primary tumors were further analyzed for BRAF and PIK3CA mutational status and for EGFR, PTEN and pAKT expression, and the number of concordant pairs was 70 (100%), 66 (94%), 43 (61%), 46 (66%) and 36 (54%), respectively. Our findings suggest that the mutational status of KRAS, BRAF and PIK3CA in the primary tumor is an adequate surrogate marker of the status in the metastatic disease. On the other hand, the immunohistochemical analysis of EGFR, PTEN and pAKT showed a much higher degree of discordance between primaries and related metastases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22229245     DOI: 10.2174/156800912799095162

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Cancer Drug Targets        ISSN: 1568-0096            Impact factor:   3.428


  16 in total

Review 1.  Pragmatic issues in biomarker evaluation for targeted therapies in cancer.

Authors:  Armand de Gramont; Sarah Watson; Lee M Ellis; Jordi Rodón; Josep Tabernero; Aimery de Gramont; Stanley R Hamilton
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 2.  Current companion diagnostics in advanced colorectal cancer; getting a bigger and better piece of the pie.

Authors:  Jonathan M Loree; Scott Kopetz; Kanwal P S Raghav
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2017-02

Review 3.  Molecular Biomarkers for the Evaluation of Colorectal Cancer: Guideline From the American Society for Clinical Pathology, College of American Pathologists, Association for Molecular Pathology, and American Society of Clinical Oncology.

Authors:  Antonia R Sepulveda; Stanley R Hamilton; Carmen J Allegra; Wayne Grody; Allison M Cushman-Vokoun; William K Funkhouser; Scott E Kopetz; Christopher Lieu; Noralane M Lindor; Bruce D Minsky; Federico A Monzon; Daniel J Sargent; Veena M Singh; Joseph Willis; Jennifer Clark; Carol Colasacco; R Bryan Rumble; Robyn Temple-Smolkin; Christina B Ventura; Jan A Nowak
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 5.568

4.  Molecular Biomarkers for the Evaluation of Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Antonia R Sepulveda; Stanley R Hamilton; Carmen J Allegra; Wayne Grody; Allison M Cushman-Vokoun; William K Funkhouser; Scott E Kopetz; Christopher Lieu; Noralane M Lindor; Bruce D Minsky; Federico A Monzon; Daniel J Sargent; Veena M Singh; Joseph Willis; Jennifer Clark; Carol Colasacco; R Bryan Rumble; Robyn Temple-Smolkin; Christina B Ventura; Jan A Nowak
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2017-02-03       Impact factor: 2.493

5.  Gene expression differences in primary colorectal tumors and matched liver metastases: chemotherapy related or tumoral heterogeneity?

Authors:  M López-Gómez; J Moreno-Rubio; I Suárez-García; P Cejas; R Madero; E Casado; A M Jiménez; M Sereno; C Gómez-Raposo; F Zambrana; M Merino; D Fernández-Luengas; J Feliu
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2014-10-10       Impact factor: 3.405

6.  Bio-imaging of colorectal cancer models using near infrared labeled epidermal growth factor.

Authors:  Gadi Cohen; Shimon Lecht; Hadar Arien-Zakay; Keren Ettinger; Orit Amsalem; Mor Oron-Herman; Eylon Yavin; Diana Prus; Simon Benita; Aviram Nissan; Philip Lazarovici
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-08       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Concordant analysis of KRAS, BRAF, PIK3CA mutations, and PTEN expression between primary colorectal cancer and matched metastases.

Authors:  Chen Mao; Xin-Yin Wu; Zu-Yao Yang; Diane Erin Threapleton; Jin-Qiu Yuan; Yuan-Yuan Yu; Jin-Ling Tang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-02-02       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  PTEN expression is consistent in colorectal cancer primaries and metastases and associates with patient survival.

Authors:  Chloe E Atreya; Zaina Sangale; Nafei Xu; Mary R Matli; Eliso Tikishvili; William Welbourn; Steven Stone; Kevan M Shokat; Robert S Warren
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2013-06-10       Impact factor: 4.452

9.  Preventive evolutionary medicine of cancers.

Authors:  Michael E Hochberg; Frédéric Thomas; Eric Assenat; Urszula Hibner
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 5.183

10.  Prognostic impact and the relevance of PTEN copy number alterations in patients with advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) receiving bevacizumab.

Authors:  Timothy J Price; Jennifer E Hardingham; Chee K Lee; Amanda R Townsend; Joseph W Wrin; Kate Wilson; Andrew Weickhardt; Robert J Simes; Carmel Murone; Niall C Tebbutt
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2013-03-25       Impact factor: 4.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.