Literature DB >> 22228631

Quantitative cell-free DNA, KRAS, and BRAF mutations in plasma from patients with metastatic colorectal cancer during treatment with cetuximab and irinotecan.

Karen-Lise Garm Spindler1, Niels Pallisgaard, Ivan Vogelius, Anders Jakobsen.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The present study investigated the levels of circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in plasma from patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in relation to third-line treatment with cetuximab and irinotecan and the quantitative relationship of cfDNA with tumor-specific mutations in plasma. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: Inclusion criteria were histopathologically verified chemotherapy-resistant mCRC, adequate Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, and organ function. Treatment consisted of irinotecan being administered at 350 mg/m(2) for 3 weeks and weekly administration of 250 mg/m(2) cetuximab until progression or unacceptable toxicity. A quantitative PCR method was developed to assess the number of cfDNA alleles and KRAS and BRAF mutation alleles in plasma at baseline.
RESULTS: The study included 108 patients. Only three patients were positive for BRAF mutations. The majority of KRAS mutations detected in tumors were also found in the plasma [32 of 41 (78%)]. Plasma cfDNA and plasma mutant KRAS levels (pmKRAS) were strongly correlated (r = 0.85, P < 10(-4)). The disease control rate was 77% in patients with low cfDNA (<25% quartile) and 30% in patients with high cfDNA [>75% quartile (P = 0.009)]. Patients with pmKRAS levels higher than 75% had a disease control rate of 0% compared with 42% in patients with lower pmKRAS (P = 0.048). Cox analysis confirmed the prognostic importance of both cfDNA and pmKRAS. High levels were clear indicators of a poor outcome.
CONCLUSIONS: KRAS analysis in plasma is a viable alternative to tissue analysis. Quantitative levels of cfDNA and pmKRAS are strongly correlated and hold promise of clinical application. ©2012 AACR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22228631     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-0564

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  95 in total

Review 1.  Cell-Free DNA in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Karen-Lise G Spindler; Anders K Boysen; Niels Pallisgård; Julia S Johansen; Josep Tabernero; Morten M Sørensen; Benny V Jensen; Torben F Hansen; David Sefrioui; Rikke F Andersen; Ivan Brandslund; Anders Jakobsen
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2017-08-04

2.  Circulating tumor DNA: a resuscitative gold mine?

Authors:  Zhaohui Huang; Bing Gu
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2015-10

3.  Clinical validation of the detection of KRAS and BRAF mutations from circulating tumor DNA.

Authors:  Alain R Thierry; Florent Mouliere; Safia El Messaoudi; Caroline Mollevi; Evelyne Lopez-Crapez; Fanny Rolet; Brigitte Gillet; Celine Gongora; Pierre Dechelotte; Bruno Robert; Maguy Del Rio; Pierre-Jean Lamy; Frederic Bibeau; Michelle Nouaille; Virginie Loriot; Anne-Sophie Jarrousse; Franck Molina; Muriel Mathonnet; Denis Pezet; Marc Ychou
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2014-03-23       Impact factor: 53.440

Review 4.  Clinical Utility of Analyzing Circulating Tumor DNA in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Yoshiaki Nakamura; Takayuki Yoshino
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2018-04-26

5.  Clinical Applications of Liquid Biopsies in Gastrointestinal Oncology.

Authors:  Anastasia Katsiampoura; Scott Kopetz
Journal:  Gastrointest Cancer Res       Date:  2014-09

6.  [Association of RAS mutations in circulating cell-free DNA in the plasma with clinicopathological features of colorectal cancer].

Authors:  Jing Wu; Li-Rong Zhao; Xiu-Qiang Lin; Fen Feng; Yong-Chang Chen; Wei-Ying Deng; Yan-Ming Deng; Wei Wang
Journal:  Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao       Date:  2017-07-20

Review 7.  Current companion diagnostics in advanced colorectal cancer; getting a bigger and better piece of the pie.

Authors:  Jonathan M Loree; Scott Kopetz; Kanwal P S Raghav
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2017-02

8.  Does Size Matter? Comparison of Extraction Yields for Different-Sized DNA Fragments by Seven Different Routine and Four New Circulating Cell-Free Extraction Methods.

Authors:  Linda Cook; Kimberly Starr; Jerry Boonyaratanakornkit; Randall Hayden; Soya S Sam; Angela M Caliendo
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 9.  Clinical validity of saliva and novel technology for cancer detection.

Authors:  Karolina Elżbieta Kaczor-Urbanowicz; Fang Wei; Shannon Liu Rao; Jinseok Kim; Heebum Shin; Jordan Cheng; Michael Tu; David T W Wong; Yong Kim
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer       Date:  2019-05-30       Impact factor: 10.680

Review 10.  Latest development of liquid biopsy.

Authors:  Alvin Ho-Kwan Cheung; Chit Chow; Ka-Fai To
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 2.895

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.