Literature DB >> 22228542

Induction and repair of DNA double-strand breaks assessed by gamma-H2AX foci after irradiation with pulsed or continuous proton beams.

O Zlobinskaya1, G Dollinger, D Michalski, V Hable, C Greubel, G Du, G Multhoff, B Röper, M Molls, T E Schmid.   

Abstract

In particle tumor therapy including beam scanning at accelerators, the dose per voxel is delivered within about 100 ms. In contrast, the new technology of laser plasma acceleration will produce ultimately shorter particle packages that deliver the dose within a nanosecond. Here, possible differences for relative biological effectiveness in creating DNA double-strand breaks in pulsed or continuous irradiation mode are studied. HeLa cells were irradiated with 1 or 5 Gy of 20-MeV protons at the Munich tandem accelerator, either at continuous mode (100 ms), or applying a single pulse of 1-ns duration. Cells were fixed 1 h after 1-Gy irradiation and 24 h after 5-Gy irradiation, respectively. A dose-effect curve based on five doses of X-rays was taken as reference. The total number of phosphorylated histone H2AX (gamma-H2AX) foci per cell was determined using a custom-made software macro for gamma-H2AX foci counting. For 1 h after 1-Gy 20-MeV proton exposures, values for the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of 0.97 ± 0.19 for pulsed and 1.13 ± 0.21 for continuous irradiations were obtained in the first experiment 1.13 ± 0.09 and 1.16 ± 0.09 in the second experiment. After 5 Gy and 24 h, RBE values of 0.99 ± 0.29 and 0.91 ± 0.23 were calculated, respectively. Based on the gamma-H2AX foci numbers obtained, no significant differences in RBE between pulsed and continuous proton irradiation in HeLa cells were detected. These results are well in line with our data on micronucleus induction in HeLa cells.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22228542     DOI: 10.1007/s00411-011-0398-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys        ISSN: 0301-634X            Impact factor:   1.925


  34 in total

Review 1.  The gamma-H2A.X: is it just a surrogate marker of double-strand breaks or much more?

Authors:  Ismail Hassan Ismail; Michael J Hendzel
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.216

Review 2.  Microscopic imaging of DNA repair foci in irradiated normal tissues.

Authors:  Nirmal Bhogal; Farid Jalali; Robert G Bristow
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 2.694

3.  No evidence for a different RBE between pulsed and continuous 20 MeV protons.

Authors:  T E Schmid; G Dollinger; A Hauptner; V Hable; C Greubel; S Auer; A A Friedl; M Molls; B Röper
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.841

4.  Evidence for a lack of DNA double-strand break repair in human cells exposed to very low x-ray doses.

Authors:  Kai Rothkamm; Markus Löbrich
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-04-04       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  gamma-H2AX dephosphorylation by protein phosphatase 2A facilitates DNA double-strand break repair.

Authors:  Dipanjan Chowdhury; Michael-Christopher Keogh; Haruhiko Ishii; Craig L Peterson; Stephen Buratowski; Judy Lieberman
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2005-11-28       Impact factor: 17.970

6.  The effectiveness of 20 mev protons at nanosecond pulse lengths in producing chromosome aberrations in human-hamster hybrid cells.

Authors:  T E Schmid; G Dollinger; V Hable; C Greubel; O Zlobinskaya; D Michalski; S Auer; A A Friedl; E Schmid; M Molls; B Röper
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2011-03-25       Impact factor: 2.841

7.  Expression of phosphorylated histone H2AX in cultured cell lines following exposure to X-rays.

Authors:  S H MacPhail; J P Banáth; T Y Yu; E H M Chu; H Lambur; P L Olive
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.694

8.  Significance and implementation of RBE variations in proton beam therapy.

Authors:  H Paganetti
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2003-10

9.  Megabase chromatin domains involved in DNA double-strand breaks in vivo.

Authors:  E P Rogakou; C Boon; C Redon; W M Bonner
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1999-09-06       Impact factor: 10.539

Review 10.  Gamma-H2AX in recognition and signaling of DNA double-strand breaks in the context of chromatin.

Authors:  Andrea Kinner; Wenqi Wu; Christian Staudt; George Iliakis
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2008-09-04       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  7 in total

1.  Radiobiological influence of megavoltage electron pulses of ultra-high pulse dose rate on normal tissue cells.

Authors:  Lydia Laschinsky; Leonhard Karsch; Elisabeth Leßmann; Melanie Oppelt; Jörg Pawelke; Christian Richter; Michael Schürer; Elke Beyreuther
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 1.925

2.  Biological effects in normal cells exposed to FLASH dose rate protons.

Authors:  Manuela Buonanno; Veljko Grilj; David J Brenner
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 6.280

3.  Biosensor for deconvolution of individual cell fate in response to ion beam irradiation.

Authors:  Martin Niklas; Julian Schlegel; Hans Liew; Ferdinand Zimmermann; Katrin Rein; Dietrich W M Walsh; Oleh Dzyubachyk; Tim Holland-Letz; Shirin Rahmanian; Steffen Greilich; Armin Runz; Oliver Jäkel; Jürgen Debus; Amir Abdollahi
Journal:  Cell Rep Methods       Date:  2022-02-17

4.  The Importance and Clinical Implications of FLASH Ultra-High Dose-Rate Studies for Proton and Heavy Ion Radiotherapy.

Authors:  Nicholas W Colangelo; Edouard I Azzam
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2019-10-28       Impact factor: 2.841

5.  Endonuclease G preferentially cleaves 5-hydroxymethylcytosine-modified DNA creating a substrate for recombination.

Authors:  Adam B Robertson; Julia Robertson; Markus Fusser; Arne Klungland
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 6.  Current concepts in clinical radiation oncology.

Authors:  Michael Orth; Kirsten Lauber; Maximilian Niyazi; Anna A Friedl; Minglun Li; Cornelius Maihöfer; Lars Schüttrumpf; Anne Ernst; Olivier M Niemöller; Claus Belka
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2013-10-20       Impact factor: 1.925

7.  Dose-rate effect of ultrashort electron beam radiation on DNA damage and repair in vitro.

Authors:  Nelly Babayan; Galina Hovhannisyan; Bagrat Grigoryan; Ruzanna Grigoryan; Natalia Sarkisyan; Gohar Tsakanova; Samvel Haroutiunian; Rouben Aroutiounian
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 2.724

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.