Literature DB >> 22228130

Slice-thickness evaluation in CT and MRI: an alternative computerised procedure.

G Acri1, M G Tripepi, F Causa, B Testagrossa, R Novario, G Vermiglio.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The efficient use of computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) equipment necessitates establishing adequate quality-control (QC) procedures. In particular, the accuracy of slice thickness (ST) requires scan exploration of phantoms containing test objects (plane, cone or spiral). To simplify such procedures, a novel phantom and a computerised LabView-based procedure have been devised, enabling determination of full width at half maximum (FWHM) in real time.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The phantom consists of a polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) box, diagonally crossed by a PMMA septum dividing the box into two sections. The phantom images were acquired and processed using the LabView-based procedure.
RESULTS: The LabView (LV) results were compared with those obtained by processing the same phantom images with commercial software, and the Fisher exact test (F test) was conducted on the resulting data sets to validate the proposed methodology.
CONCLUSIONS: In all cases, there was no statistically significant variation between the two different procedures and the LV procedure, which can therefore be proposed as a valuable alternative to other commonly used procedures and be reliably used on any CT and MRI scanner.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22228130     DOI: 10.1007/s11547-011-0775-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Med        ISSN: 0033-8362            Impact factor:   3.469


  6 in total

1.  Quality assurance for computed-tomography simulators and the computed-tomography-simulation process: report of the AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group No. 66.

Authors:  Sasa Mutic; Jatinder R Palta; Elizabeth K Butker; Indra J Das; M Saiful Huq; Leh-Nien Dick Loo; Bill J Salter; Cynthia H McCollough; Jacob Van Dyk
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Quality assurance of clinical MRI scanners using ACR MRI phantom: preliminary results.

Authors:  Chien-Chuan Chen; Yung-Liang Wan; Yau-Yau Wai; Ho-Ling Liu
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Quantitative assessment of computed radiography quality control parameters.

Authors:  O Rampado; P Isoardi; R Ropolo
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2006-03-01       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Real-time B-mode ultrasound quality control test procedures. Report of AAPM Ultrasound Task Group No. 1.

Authors:  M M Goodsitt; P L Carson; S Witt; D L Hykes; J M Kofler
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Quality assurance methods and phantoms for magnetic resonance imaging: report of AAPM nuclear magnetic resonance Task Group No. 1.

Authors:  R R Price; L Axel; T Morgan; R Newman; W Perman; N Schneiders; M Selikson; M Wood; S R Thomas
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1990 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Evaluation of two software tools dedicated to an automatic analysis of the CT scanner image spatial resolution.

Authors:  Tarraf Torfeh; Stéphane Beaumont; Jean Pierre Guédon; Eloïse Denis
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2007
  6 in total
  1 in total

1.  A Novel Phantom and a Dedicated Developed Software for Image Quality Controls in X-Ray Intraoral Devices.

Authors:  Giuseppe Acri; Sergio Gurgone; Claudio Iovane; Marco B Romeo; Daniele Borzelli; Barbara Testagrossa
Journal:  J Biomed Phys Eng       Date:  2021-04-01
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.