Moritoki Egi1, Kiyoshi Morita. 1. Department of Anesthesiology and Resuscitology, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama city, Okayama 700-8558, Japan. moriori@tg8.so-net.ne.jp
Abstract
PURPOSE: There is no recommendation on how increased body temperature should be treated in non-neurological critically ill patients. To understand the epidemiology of fever and its association with mortality, we conducted a systematic review of the literature to search for data related to the association between fever and mortality. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We searched MEDLINE and PUBMED related articles and reference lists from January 1978 to July 2011 to select observational studies for assessment of the association of fever with mortality in non-neurological critically ill patients. RESULTS: We reviewed 1464 articles and found 9 relevant articles. We found that (1) there is no uniform definition of fever, (2) fever (37.5°C to >39.0°C) was not significantly associated with mortality (odds ratio, 1.22; P = .52), and (3) high fever (39.3°C to 39.5°C) was significantly associated with mortality (odds ratio, 2.95; P = .03). We also found that there has been no multicenter prospective observational study including important confounding factors, such as the use of antipyretic treatments, steroids, and extracorporeal circuits. CONCLUSIONS: The limited evidence available suggests that the recommended definition of fever (38.3°C) might be too low to predict increased mortality. Because fever is common in the intensive care unit, there is an urgent need for more studies in this field.
PURPOSE: There is no recommendation on how increased body temperature should be treated in non-neurological critically illpatients. To understand the epidemiology of fever and its association with mortality, we conducted a systematic review of the literature to search for data related to the association between fever and mortality. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We searched MEDLINE and PUBMED related articles and reference lists from January 1978 to July 2011 to select observational studies for assessment of the association of fever with mortality in non-neurological critically illpatients. RESULTS: We reviewed 1464 articles and found 9 relevant articles. We found that (1) there is no uniform definition of fever, (2) fever (37.5°C to >39.0°C) was not significantly associated with mortality (odds ratio, 1.22; P = .52), and (3) high fever (39.3°C to 39.5°C) was significantly associated with mortality (odds ratio, 2.95; P = .03). We also found that there has been no multicenter prospective observational study including important confounding factors, such as the use of antipyretic treatments, steroids, and extracorporeal circuits. CONCLUSIONS: The limited evidence available suggests that the recommended definition of fever (38.3°C) might be too low to predict increased mortality. Because fever is common in the intensive care unit, there is an urgent need for more studies in this field.
Authors: Satoshi Suzuki; Glenn M Eastwood; Michael Bailey; David Gattas; Peter Kruger; Manoj Saxena; John D Santamaria; Rinaldo Bellomo Journal: Crit Care Date: 2015-04-13 Impact factor: 9.097