Literature DB >> 22226491

Influence of surgeon volume on outcomes with aortic valve replacement.

Todd M Dewey1, Morley A Herbert, William H Ryan, William T Brinkman, Robert Smith, Syma L Prince, Michael J Mack.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A volume-outcome association has been shown for cardiovascular procedures such as coronary artery bypass grafting. The association of a volume-outcome relationship for aortic valve replacement procedures, however, has not been clearly defined. We evaluated the influence of surgeon volume on operative outcomes with isolated aortic valve replacement and aortic valve replacement with concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting.
METHODS: One thousand six hundred thirty-five patients were identified as having either isolated aortic valve replacement or aortic valve replacement plus coronary artery bypass grafting between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2009. Patients were divided into three equal terciles using their Society of Thoracic Surgery Predicted Risk of Mortality scores. Data were retrieved on 14 surgeons with complete data records in our Society of Thoracic Surgery database covering a minimum 5-year period (mean, 8.9 ± 1.5 years; median, 10 years).
RESULTS: Clinically significant increases are seen in operative mortality, permanent stroke, renal failure, prolonged ventilation, and hospital and intensive care unit lengths of stay in the high-risk compared with low-risk groups. The low-risk patient group has the smallest observed to expected ratio, less than 50%, whereas in the high-risk group the ratio is greater than 1. Odds ratios demonstrate that as surgeon volume increases, outcomes improve correspondingly (ie, odds ratio <1). In low-risk patients, five of ten major complications demonstrated improved outcomes with increased surgeon volume; in medium and high-risk groups eight of ten were improved.
CONCLUSIONS: Surgeon volumes have a significant influence on operative outcomes in high-risk patients undergoing aortic valve replacement or aortic valve replacement with coronary artery bypass grafting.
Copyright © 2012 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22226491     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.09.064

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  11 in total

1.  [Can anesthetists improve long-term oncological results?].

Authors:  P Kienbaum
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.041

2.  Role of Hospital Volumes in Identifying Low-Performing and High-Performing Aortic and Mitral Valve Surgical Centers in the United States.

Authors:  Rohan Khera; Ambarish Pandey; Thomas Koshy; Colby Ayers; Brahmajee K Nallamothu; Sandeep R Das; Mark H Drazner; Michael E Jessen; Ajay J Kirtane; Timothy J Gardner; James A de Lemos; Deepak L Bhatt; Dharam J Kumbhani
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 14.676

3.  Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement versus aortic valve replacement through full sternotomy: the Brigham and Women's Hospital experience.

Authors:  Robert C Neely; Marko T Boskovski; Igor Gosev; Tsuyoshi Kaneko; Siobhan McGurk; Marzia Leacche; Lawrence H Cohn
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2015-01

4.  How Referring Providers Choose Specialists for Their Patients: a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Caitlin B Finn; Jason K Tong; Hannah E Alexander; Chris Wirtalla; Heather Wachtel; Carmen E Guerra; Shivan J Mehta; Richard Wender; Rachel R Kelz
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2022-04-19       Impact factor: 6.473

5.  Surgical versus medical treatment for infective endocarditis in patients on dialysis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sze-Wen Ting; Jia-Jin Chen; Tao-Han Lee; George Kuo
Journal:  Ren Fail       Date:  2022-12       Impact factor: 3.222

Review 6.  Surgical treatment of aortic valve disease.

Authors:  Tirone E David
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 32.419

7.  Counterpoint: Access to transcatheter aortic valve replacement should not be limited to high-volume surgical centers.

Authors:  Philip Green; Gregg F Rosner; Martin B Leon; Allan Schwartz
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 5.209

8.  Center Variability in Medicare Claims-Based Publicly Reported Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Outcome Measures.

Authors:  Michael P Thompson; Hechuan Hou; Alexander A Brescia; Francis D Pagani; Devraj Sukul; Jeffrey S McCullough; Donald S Likosky
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2021-10-23       Impact factor: 5.501

9.  The dialysis facility levels and sizes are associated with outcomes of incident hemodialysis patients.

Authors:  George Kuo; Tao-Han Lee; Jia-Jin Chen; Chieh-Li Yen; Pei-Chun Fan; Cheng-Chia Lee; Chih-Hsiang Chang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-10-18       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Institutional case volume and mortality after aortic and mitral valve replacement: a nationwide study in two Korean cohorts.

Authors:  Karam Nam; Eun Jin Jang; Jun Woo Jo; Jiwon You; Jung-Bin Park; Ho Geol Ryu
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2022-08-20       Impact factor: 1.522

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.