Literature DB >> 22225511

Calculations on noncovalent interactions and databases of benchmark interaction energies.

Pavel Hobza1.   

Abstract

Although covalent interactions determine the primary structure of a molecule, the noncovalent interactions are responsible for the tertiary and quaternary structure of a molecule and create the fascinating world of the 3D architectures of biomacromolecules. For example, the double helical structure of DNA is of fundamental importance for the function of DNA: it allows it to store and transfer genetic information. To fulfill this role, the structure is rigid to maintain the double helix with a proper positioning of the complementary base, and floppy to allow for its opening. Very strong covalent interactions cannot fulfill both of these criteria, but noncovalent interactions, which are about 2 orders of magnitude weaker, can. This Account highlights the recent advances in the field of the design of novel wave function theory (WFT) methods applicable to noncovalent complexes ranging in size from less than 100 atoms, for which highly accurate ab initio methods are available, up to extended ones (several thousands atoms), which are the domain of semiempirical QM (SQM) methods. Accurate interaction energies for noncovalent complexes are generated by the coupled-cluster technique, taking single- and double-electron excitations iteratively and triple-electron excitation perturbatively with a complete basis set description (CCSD(T)/CBS). The procedure provides interaction energies with high accuracy (error less than 1 kcal/mol). Because the method is computationally demanding, its application is limited to complexes smaller than 30 atoms. But researchers would also like to use computational methods to determine these interaction energies accurately for larger biological and nanoscale structures. Standard QM methods such as MP2, MP3, CCSD, or DFT fail to describe various types of noncovalent systems (H-bonded, stacked, dispersion-controlled, etc.) with comparable accuracy. Therefore, novel methods are needed that have been parametrized toward noncovalent interactions, and existing benchmark data sets represent an important tool for the development of new methods providing reliable characteristics of noncovalent clusters. Our laboratory developed the first suitable data set of CCSD(T)/CBS interaction energies and geometries of various noncovalent complexes, called S22. Since its publication in 2006, it has frequently been applied in parametrization and/or verification of various wave function and density functional techniques. During the intense use of this data set, several inconsistencies emerged, such as the insufficient accuracy of the CCSD(T) correction term or its unbalanced character, which has triggered the introduction of a new, broader, and more accurate data set called the S66 data set. It contains not only 66 CCSD(T)/CBS interaction energies determined in the equilibrium geometries but also 1056 interaction energies calculated at the same level for nonequilibrium geometries. The S22 and S66 data sets have been used for the verification of various WFT methods, and the lowest RMSE (S66, in kcal/mol) was found for the recently introduced SCS-MI-CCSD/CBS (0.08), MP2.5/CBS (0.16), MP2.X/6-31G* (0.27), and SCS-MI-MP2/CBS (0.38) methods. Because of their computational economy, the MP2.5 and MP2.X/6-31G* methods can be recommended for highly accurate calculations of large complexes with up to 100 atoms. The evaluation of SQM methods was based only on the S22 data set, and because some of these methods have been parametrized toward the same data set, the respective results should be taken with caution. For really extended complexes such as protein-ligand systems, only the SMQ methods are applicable. After adding the corrections to the dispersion energy and H-bonding, several methods exhibit surprisingly low RMSE (even below 0.5 kcal/mol). Among the various SMQ methods, the PM6-DH2 can be recommended because of its computational efficiency and it can be used for optimization (which is not the case for other SQM methods). The PM6-DH2 is the base of our novel scoring function used in in silico drug design.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22225511     DOI: 10.1021/ar200255p

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acc Chem Res        ISSN: 0001-4842            Impact factor:   22.384


  24 in total

1.  Nucleic acid reactivity: challenges for next-generation semiempirical quantum models.

Authors:  Ming Huang; Timothy J Giese; Darrin M York
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 3.376

2.  Effects of the protonation state in the interaction of an HIV-1 reverse transcriptase (RT) amino acid, Lys101, and a non nucleoside RT inhibitor, GW420867X.

Authors:  Sérgio E Galembeck; F Matthias Bickelhaupt; Célia Fonseca Guerra; Eduardo Galembeck
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2014-06-26       Impact factor: 1.810

3.  Binding Thermodynamics and Kinetics Calculations Using Chemical Host and Guest: A Comprehensive Picture of Molecular Recognition.

Authors:  Zhiye Tang; Chia-En A Chang
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 6.006

4.  How accurate is the description of ligand-protein interactions by a hybrid QM/MM approach?

Authors:  Jakub Kollar; Vladimir Frecer
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 1.810

5.  A computational study of hydrogen bonds in intermolecular systems of high complexity: arachno-pentaborane(11)···Y with Y = O2 and N 2.

Authors:  Abedin Zabardasti; Hamid Goudarziafshar; Maryam Salehnassaj; Boaz G Oliveira
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 1.810

6.  Contribution of phenylalanine side chain intercalation to the TATA-box binding protein-DNA interaction: molecular dynamics and dispersion-corrected density functional theory studies.

Authors:  Manas Mondal; Sanchita Mukherjee; Dhananjay Bhattacharyya
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2014-10-30       Impact factor: 1.810

7.  Quantum Mechanics Approaches to Drug Research in the Era of Structural Chemogenomics.

Authors:  Andrey V Ilatovskiy; Ruben Abagyan; Irina Kufareva
Journal:  Int J Quantum Chem       Date:  2013-06-15       Impact factor: 2.444

8.  The roles of charge transfer and polarization in non-covalent interactions: a perspective from ab initio valence bond methods.

Authors:  Yirong Mo; David Danovich; Sason Shaik
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2022-08-25       Impact factor: 2.172

Review 9.  Computational approaches to predicting the impact of novel bases on RNA structure and stability.

Authors:  Jason G Harrison; Yvonne B Zheng; Peter A Beal; Dean J Tantillo
Journal:  ACS Chem Biol       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 5.100

Review 10.  Enhanced semiempirical QM methods for biomolecular interactions.

Authors:  Nusret Duygu Yilmazer; Martin Korth
Journal:  Comput Struct Biotechnol J       Date:  2015-02-28       Impact factor: 7.271

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.