Literature DB >> 22225305

Hierarchical alignment of breast DCE-MR images by groupwise registration and robust feature matching.

Minjeong Kim1, Guorong Wu, Dinggang Shen.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) shows high sensitivity in detecting breast cancer. However, its performance could be affected by patient motion during the imaging. To overcome this problem, it is necessary to correct patient motion by deformable registration, before using the DCE-MRI to detect breast cancer. However, deformable registration of DCE-MR images is challenging due to the dramatic contrast change over time (especially between the precontrast and postcontrast images). Most existing methods typically register each postcontrast image onto the precontrast image independently, without considering the dynamic contrast change after agent uptake. This could lead to the inconsistency among the aligned postcontrast images in the precontrast image space, which will eventually result in worse performance in cancer detection. In this paper, the authors present a novel hierarchical registration framework to address this problem.
METHODS: First, the authors propose a hierarchical registration framework to deploy the groupwise registration for simultaneous registration of all postcontrast images onto their group-mean image and further aligning the group-mean image of postcontrast images onto the precontrast image space for final alignment of all precontrast and postcontrast images. In this way, the postcontrast images (with similar intensity patterns) can be jointly aligned onto the precontrast image for increasing their overall consistency after registration. Second, in order to improve the registration between the precontrast image and the group-mean image of the postcontrast images, the authors propose using the contrast-invariant attribute vectors to guide the robust feature matching during the registration.
RESULTS: Our proposed hierarchical registration framework has been comprehensively evaluated and compared with affine registration and widely used deformable registration methods in both pairwise and groupwise registration formulation. The experimental results on both real and simulated images show that our method can obtain not only more accurate but also more consistent registration results than any of all other registration algorithms.
CONCLUSIONS: The authors have proposed a novel groupwise registration method to achieve accurate and consistent alignment for breast DCE-MR images. In the future, the authors will further evaluate our proposed method with more clinical datasets.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22225305      PMCID: PMC3259615          DOI: 10.1118/1.3665705

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  20 in total

1.  Comparison and evaluation of rigid, affine, and nonrigid registration of breast MR images.

Authors:  E R Denton; L I Sonoda; D Rueckert; S C Rankin; C Hayes; M O Leach; D L Hill; D J Hawkes
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1999 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.826

2.  Nonrigid registration using free-form deformations: application to breast MR images.

Authors:  D Rueckert; L I Sonoda; C Hayes; D L Hill; M O Leach; D J Hawkes
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 10.048

3.  Comparison of rigid and elastic matching of dynamic magnetic resonance mammographic images by mutual information.

Authors:  T Brückner; R Lucht; G Brix
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Volume-preserving nonrigid registration of MR breast images using free-form deformation with an incompressibility constraint.

Authors:  Torsten Rohlfing; Calvin R Maurer; David A Bluemke; Michael A Jacobs
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 10.048

5.  A general PDE-framework for registration of contrast enhanced images.

Authors:  Mehran Ebrahimi; Anne L Martel
Journal:  Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv       Date:  2009

Review 6.  Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL.

Authors:  Stephen M Smith; Mark Jenkinson; Mark W Woolrich; Christian F Beckmann; Timothy E J Behrens; Heidi Johansen-Berg; Peter R Bannister; Marilena De Luca; Ivana Drobnjak; David E Flitney; Rami K Niazy; James Saunders; John Vickers; Yongyue Zhang; Nicola De Stefano; J Michael Brady; Paul M Matthews
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Simultaneous multiple image registration method for T1 estimation in breast MRI images.

Authors:  Jonathan Lok-Chuen Lo; Michael Brady; Niall Moore
Journal:  Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv       Date:  2006

8.  A computational approach to edge detection.

Authors:  J Canny
Journal:  IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 6.226

Review 9.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging as an imaging biomarker.

Authors:  Nola Hylton
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-07-10       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Analysis of dynamic MR breast images using a model of contrast enhancement.

Authors:  P Hayton; M Brady; L Tarassenko; N Moore
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 8.545

View more
  4 in total

1.  Computer-aided diagnosis of breast DCE-MRI images using bilateral asymmetry of contrast enhancement between two breasts.

Authors:  Qian Yang; Lihua Li; Juan Zhang; Guoliang Shao; Chengjie Zhang; Bin Zheng
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Deformable registration for quantifying longitudinal tumor changes during neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Yangming Ou; Susan P Weinstein; Emily F Conant; Sarah Englander; Xiao Da; Bilwaj Gaonkar; Meng-Kang Hsieh; Mark Rosen; Angela DeMichele; Christos Davatzikos; Despina Kontos
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  A method for limiting pitfalls in the production of enhancement kinetic curves in 3T dynamic magnetic resonance mammography.

Authors:  Eleftherios Lavdas; Panayiotis Mavroidis; Violeta Roka; Nikolaos Arikidis; Dimitrios L Arvanitis; Ioannis V Fezoulidis; Katerina Vassiou
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 2.895

4.  A computerized global MR image feature analysis scheme to assist diagnosis of breast cancer: a preliminary assessment.

Authors:  Qian Yang; Lihua Li; Juan Zhang; Guoliang Shao; Bin Zheng
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2014-03-22       Impact factor: 3.528

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.