Literature DB >> 22225300

Attenuation, scattering, and absorption of ultrasound in the skull bone.

Gianmarco Pinton1, Jean-Francois Aubry, Emmanuel Bossy, Marie Muller, Mathieu Pernot, Mickael Tanter.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Measured values of ultrasound attenuation in bone represent a combination of different loss mechanisms. As a wave is transmitted from a fluid into bone, reflections occur at the interface. In the bone, mode conversion occurs between longitudinal and shear modes and the mechanical wave is scattered by its complex internal microstructure. Finally, part of the wave energy is absorbed by the bone and converted into heat. Due to the complexity of the wave propagation and the difficulty in performing measurements that are capable of separating the various loss mechanisms, there are currently no estimates of the absorption in bone. The aim of this paper is, thus, to quantify the attenuation, scattering, and thermal absorption in bone.
METHODS: An attenuating model of wave propagation in bone is established and used to develop a three-dimensional finite difference time domain numerical algorithm. Hydrophone and optical heterodyne interferometer measurements of the acoustic field as well as a x-ray microtomography of the bone sample are used to drive the simulations and to measure the attenuation. The acoustic measurements are performed concurrently with an infrared camera that can measure the temperature elevation during insonication. A link between the temperature and the absorption via a three-dimensional thermal simulation is then used to quantify the absorption coefficients for longitudinal and shear waves in cortical bone.
RESULTS: We demonstrate that only a small part of the attenuation is due to absorption in bone and that the majority of the attenuation is due to reflection, scattering, and mode conversion. In the nine samples of a human used for the study, the absorption time constant for cortical bone was determined to be 1.04 μs ± 28%. This corresponds to a longitudinal absorption of 2.7 dB/cm and a shear absorption of 5.4 dB/cm. The experimentally measured attenuation across the approximately 8 mm thick samples was 13.3 ± 0.97 dB/cm.
CONCLUSIONS: This first measurement of ultrasound absorption in bone can be used to estimate the amount of heat deposition based on knowledge of the acoustic field.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22225300     DOI: 10.1118/1.3668316

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  69 in total

1.  Comparison of analytical and numerical approaches for CT-based aberration correction in transcranial passive acoustic imaging.

Authors:  Ryan M Jones; Kullervo Hynynen
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Predicting Bone Marrow Damage in the Skull After Clinical Transcranial MRI-Guided Focused Ultrasound With Acoustic and Thermal Simulations.

Authors:  Nathan McDannold; P Jason White; Rees Cosgrove
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2020-04-21       Impact factor: 10.048

3.  Transcranial cavitation detection in primates during blood-brain barrier opening--a performance assessment study.

Authors:  Shih-Ying Wu; Yao-Sheng Tung; Fabrice Marquet; Matthew Downs; Carlos Sanchez; Cherry Chen; Vincent Ferrera; Elisa Konofagou
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.725

4.  Multi-resolution simulation of focused ultrasound propagation through ovine skull from a single-element transducer.

Authors:  Kyungho Yoon; Wonhye Lee; Phillip Croce; Amanda Cammalleri; Seung-Schik Yoo
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Experimental demonstration of passive acoustic imaging in the human skull cavity using CT-based aberration corrections.

Authors:  Ryan M Jones; Meaghan A O'Reilly; Kullervo Hynynen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Offline impact of transcranial focused ultrasound on cortical activation in primates.

Authors:  Lennart Verhagen; Cécile Gallea; Matthew Fs Rushworth; Pierre Pouget; Jean-François Aubry; Jerome Sallet; Davide Folloni; Charlotte Constans; Daria Ea Jensen; Harry Ahnine; Léa Roumazeilles; Mathieu Santin; Bashir Ahmed; Stéphane Lehericy; Miriam C Klein-Flügge; Kristine Krug; Rogier B Mars
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-02-12       Impact factor: 8.140

Review 7.  Focused Ultrasound for Neuromodulation.

Authors:  David P Darrow
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 7.620

8.  Noninvasive neuromodulation and thalamic mapping with low-intensity focused ultrasound.

Authors:  Robert F Dallapiazza; Kelsie F Timbie; Stephen Holmberg; Jeremy Gatesman; M Beatriz Lopes; Richard J Price; G Wilson Miller; W Jeffrey Elias
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 5.115

9.  In vivo histotripsy brain treatment.

Authors:  Jonathan R Sukovich; Charles A Cain; Aditya S Pandey; Neeraj Chaudhary; Sandra Camelo-Piragua; Steven P Allen; Timothy L Hall; John Snell; Zhiyuan Xu; Jonathan M Cannata; Dejan Teofilovic; James A Bertolina; Neal Kassell; Zhen Xu
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 5.115

10.  Experimental validation of a finite-difference model for the prediction of transcranial ultrasound fields based on CT images.

Authors:  Guillaume Bouchoux; Kenneth B Bader; Joseph J Korfhagen; Jason L Raymond; Ravishankar Shivashankar; Todd A Abruzzo; Christy K Holland
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 3.609

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.