Literature DB >> 22224483

BDDCS class prediction for new molecular entities.

Fabio Broccatelli1, Gabriele Cruciani, Leslie Z Benet, Tudor I Oprea.   

Abstract

The Biopharmaceutics Drug Disposition Classification System (BDDCS) was successfully employed for predicting drug-drug interactions (DDIs) with respect to drug metabolizing enzymes (DMEs), drug transporters and their interplay. The major assumption of BDDCS is that the extent of metabolism (EoM) predicts high versus low intestinal permeability rate, and vice versa, at least when uptake transporters or paracellular transport is not involved. We recently published a collection of over 900 marketed drugs classified for BDDCS. We suggest that a reliable model for predicting BDDCS class, integrated with in vitro assays, could anticipate disposition and potential DDIs of new molecular entities (NMEs). Here we describe a computational procedure for predicting BDDCS class from molecular structures. The model was trained on a set of 300 oral drugs, and validated on an external set of 379 oral drugs, using 17 descriptors calculated or derived from the VolSurf+ software. For each molecule, a probability of BDDCS class membership was given, based on predicted EoM, FDA solubility (FDAS) and their confidence scores. The accuracy in predicting FDAS was 78% in training and 77% in validation, while for EoM prediction the accuracy was 82% in training and 79% in external validation. The actual BDDCS class corresponded to the highest ranked calculated class for 55% of the validation molecules, and it was within the top two ranked more than 92% of the time. The unbalanced stratification of the data set did not affect the prediction, which showed highest accuracy in predicting classes 2 and 3 with respect to the most populated class 1. For class 4 drugs a general lack of predictability was observed. A linear discriminant analysis (LDA) confirming the degree of accuracy for the prediction of the different BDDCS classes is tied to the structure of the data set. This model could routinely be used in early drug discovery to prioritize in vitro tests for NMEs (e.g., affinity to transporters, intestinal metabolism, intestinal absorption and plasma protein binding). We further applied the BDDCS prediction model on a large set of medicinal chemistry compounds (over 30,000 chemicals). Based on this application, we suggest that solubility, and not permeability, is the major difference between NMEs and drugs. We anticipate that the forecast of BDDCS categories in early drug discovery may lead to a significant R&D cost reduction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22224483      PMCID: PMC3295927          DOI: 10.1021/mp2004302

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Pharm        ISSN: 1543-8384            Impact factor:   4.939


  23 in total

1.  Predicting plasma protein binding of drugs: a new approach.

Authors:  Nicole A Kratochwil; Walter Huber; Francis Müller; Manfred Kansy; Paul R Gerber
Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  2002-11-01       Impact factor: 5.858

2.  Surface descriptors for protein-ligand affinity prediction.

Authors:  Ismael Zamora; Tudor Oprea; Gabriele Cruciani; Manuel Pastor; Anna-Lena Ungell
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2003-01-02       Impact factor: 7.446

Review 3.  Predicting drug disposition via application of BCS: transport/absorption/ elimination interplay and development of a biopharmaceutics drug disposition classification system.

Authors:  Chi-Yuan Wu; Leslie Z Benet
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 4.  Predictive in silico modeling for hERG channel blockers.

Authors:  Alex M Aronov
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  2005-01-15       Impact factor: 7.851

5.  In silico and in vitro filters for the fast estimation of skin permeation and distribution of new chemical entities.

Authors:  Giorgio Ottaviani; Sophie Martel; Pierre-Alain Carrupt
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2007-02-22       Impact factor: 7.446

6.  A computational procedure for determining energetically favorable binding sites on biologically important macromolecules.

Authors:  P J Goodford
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 7.446

7.  A provisional biopharmaceutical classification of the top 200 oral drug products in the United States, Great Britain, Spain, and Japan.

Authors:  Toshihide Takagi; Chandrasekharan Ramachandran; Marival Bermejo; Shinji Yamashita; Lawrence X Yu; Gordon L Amidon
Journal:  Mol Pharm       Date:  2006 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.939

8.  Hepatic microsome studies are insufficient to characterize in vivo hepatic metabolic clearance and metabolic drug-drug interactions: studies of digoxin metabolism in primary rat hepatocytes versus microsomes.

Authors:  Justine L Lam; Leslie Z Benet
Journal:  Drug Metab Dispos       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.922

9.  A theoretical basis for a biopharmaceutic drug classification: the correlation of in vitro drug product dissolution and in vivo bioavailability.

Authors:  G L Amidon; H Lennernäs; V P Shah; J R Crison
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 10.  Unmasking the dynamic interplay between efflux transporters and metabolic enzymes.

Authors:  L Z Benet; C L Cummins; C Y Wu
Journal:  Int J Pharm       Date:  2004-06-11       Impact factor: 5.875

View more
  19 in total

Review 1.  Improving the prediction of the brain disposition for orally administered drugs using BDDCS.

Authors:  Fabio Broccatelli; Caroline A Larregieu; Gabriele Cruciani; Tudor I Oprea; Leslie Z Benet
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2011-12-21       Impact factor: 15.470

2.  Elucidating the role of dose in the biopharmaceutics classification of drugs: the concepts of critical dose, effective in vivo solubility, and dose-dependent BCS.

Authors:  Georgia Charkoftaki; Aristides Dokoumetzidis; Georgia Valsami; Panos Macheras
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2012-07-04       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 3.  BDDCS Predictions, Self-Correcting Aspects of BDDCS Assignments, BDDCS Assignment Corrections, and Classification for more than 175 Additional Drugs.

Authors:  Chelsea M Hosey; Rosa Chan; Leslie Z Benet
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2015-11-20       Impact factor: 4.009

Review 4.  Reliability of In Vitro and In Vivo Methods for Predicting the Effect of P-Glycoprotein on the Delivery of Antidepressants to the Brain.

Authors:  Yi Zheng; Xijing Chen; Leslie Z Benet
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 5.  A high throughput flow cytometric assay platform targeting transporter inhibition.

Authors:  George P Tegos; Annette M Evangelisti; J Jacob Strouse; Oleg Ursu; Cristian Bologa; Larry A Sklar
Journal:  Drug Discov Today Technol       Date:  2014-06

6.  Evaluation of DILI Predictive Hypotheses in Early Drug Development.

Authors:  Rosa Chan; Leslie Z Benet
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 3.739

7.  Dedication to professor Leslie Z. Benet: 50 years of scientific excellence and still going strong!

Authors:  David E Smith; Malcolm Rowland; Kathleen M Giacomini; Gordon L Amidon
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 8.  Drug Disposition Classification Systems in Discovery and Development: A Comparative Review of the BDDCS, ECCS and ECCCS Concepts.

Authors:  Gian P Camenisch
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 4.200

9.  Novel high/low solubility classification methods for new molecular entities.

Authors:  Rutwij A Dave; Marilyn E Morris
Journal:  Int J Pharm       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 5.875

Review 10.  BDDCS, the Rule of 5 and drugability.

Authors:  Leslie Z Benet; Chelsea M Hosey; Oleg Ursu; Tudor I Oprea
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2016-05-13       Impact factor: 15.470

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.