Literature DB >> 22223746

A Bayesian model for time-to-event data with informative censoring.

Niko A Kaciroti1, Trivellore E Raghunathan, Jeremy M G Taylor, Stevo Julius.   

Abstract

Randomized trials with dropouts or censored data and discrete time-to-event type outcomes are frequently analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier or product limit (PL) estimation method. However, the PL method assumes that the censoring mechanism is noninformative and when this assumption is violated, the inferences may not be valid. We propose an expanded PL method using a Bayesian framework to incorporate informative censoring mechanism and perform sensitivity analysis on estimates of the cumulative incidence curves. The expanded method uses a model, which can be viewed as a pattern mixture model, where odds for having an event during the follow-up interval $$({t}_{k-1},{t}_{k}]$$, conditional on being at risk at $${t}_{k-1}$$, differ across the patterns of missing data. The sensitivity parameters relate the odds of an event, between subjects from a missing-data pattern with the observed subjects for each interval. The large number of the sensitivity parameters is reduced by considering them as random and assumed to follow a log-normal distribution with prespecified mean and variance. Then we vary the mean and variance to explore sensitivity of inferences. The missing at random (MAR) mechanism is a special case of the expanded model, thus allowing exploration of the sensitivity to inferences as departures from the inferences under the MAR assumption. The proposed approach is applied to data from the TRial Of Preventing HYpertension.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22223746      PMCID: PMC3297827          DOI: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxr048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biostatistics        ISSN: 1465-4644            Impact factor:   5.899


  11 in total

1.  Reparameterizing the pattern mixture model for sensitivity analyses under informative dropout.

Authors:  M J Daniels; J W Hogan
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Inference in randomized studies with informative censoring and discrete time-to-event endpoints.

Authors:  D Scharfstein; J M Robins; W Eddings; A Rotnitzky
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  On the performance of random-coefficient pattern-mixture models for non-ignorable drop-out.

Authors:  Hakan Demirtas; Joseph L Schafer
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2003-08-30       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Incorporating prior beliefs about selection bias into the analysis of randomized trials with missing outcomes.

Authors:  Daniel O Scharfstein; Michael J Daniels; James M Robins
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.899

5.  A Bayesian model for longitudinal count data with non-ignorable dropout.

Authors:  Niko A Kaciroti; Trivellore E Raghunathan; M Anthony Schork; Noreen M Clark
Journal:  J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat       Date:  2008-12-01       Impact factor: 1.864

6.  An index of local sensitivity to nonignorable drop-out in longitudinal modelling.

Authors:  Guoguang Ma; Andrea B Troxel; Daniel F Heitjan
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2005-07-30       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  A general class of pattern mixture models for nonignorable dropout with many possible dropout times.

Authors:  Jason Roy; Michael J Daniels
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2007-09-26       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  A Bayesian sensitivity model for intention-to-treat analysis on binary outcomes with dropouts.

Authors:  Niko A Kaciroti; M Anthony Schork; Trivellore Raghunathan; Stevo Julius
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2009-02-15       Impact factor: 2.373

9.  TROPHY study: Outcomes based on the Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Hypertension definition of hypertension.

Authors:  Stevo Julius; Niko Kaciroti; Brent M Egan; Shawna Nesbitt; Eric L Michelson
Journal:  J Am Soc Hypertens       Date:  2008 Jan-Feb

10.  Feasibility of treating prehypertension with an angiotensin-receptor blocker.

Authors:  Stevo Julius; Shawna D Nesbitt; Brent M Egan; Michael A Weber; Eric L Michelson; Niko Kaciroti; Henry R Black; Richard H Grimm; Franz H Messerli; Suzanne Oparil; M Anthony Schork
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-03-14       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  5 in total

1.  Relaxing the independent censoring assumption in the Cox proportional hazards model using multiple imputation.

Authors:  Dan Jackson; Ian R White; Shaun Seaman; Hannah Evans; Kathy Baisley; James Carpenter
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2014-07-25       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Reference-based sensitivity analysis for time-to-event data.

Authors:  Andrew Atkinson; Michael G Kenward; Tim Clayton; James R Carpenter
Journal:  Pharm Stat       Date:  2019-07-15       Impact factor: 1.894

Review 3.  A review of the use of controlled multiple imputation in randomised controlled trials with missing outcome data.

Authors:  Ping-Tee Tan; Suzie Cro; Eleanor Van Vogt; Matyas Szigeti; Victoria R Cornelius
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 4.615

4.  Reply to Visit-to-visit blood pressure variation: time to reanalyze all the data from the TROPHY study.

Authors:  Stevo Julius; Niko Kaciroti; Suzanne Oparil
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 3.738

Review 5.  A Bayesian natural cubic B-spline varying coefficient method for non-ignorable dropout.

Authors:  Camille M Moore; Samantha MaWhinney; Nichole E Carlson; Sarah Kreidler
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2020-10-07       Impact factor: 4.615

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.