Literature DB >> 11414563

Inference in randomized studies with informative censoring and discrete time-to-event endpoints.

D Scharfstein1, J M Robins, W Eddings, A Rotnitzky.   

Abstract

In this article, we present a method for estimating and comparing the treatment-specific distributions of a discrete time-to-event variable from right-censored data. Our method allows for (1) adjustment for informative censoring due to measured prognostic factors for time to event and censoring and (2) quantification of the sensitivity of the inference to residual dependence between time to event and censoring due to unmeasured factors. We develop our approach in the context of a randomized trial for the treatment of chronic schizophrenia. We perform a simulation study to assess the practical performance of our methodology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11414563     DOI: 10.1111/j.0006-341x.2001.00404.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  19 in total

1.  Incorporating prior beliefs about selection bias into the analysis of randomized trials with missing outcomes.

Authors:  Daniel O Scharfstein; Michael J Daniels; James M Robins
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.899

2.  A Bayesian model for time-to-event data with informative censoring.

Authors:  Niko A Kaciroti; Trivellore E Raghunathan; Jeremy M G Taylor; Stevo Julius
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2012-01-04       Impact factor: 5.899

Review 3.  Blinded independent central review of progression-free survival in phase III clinical trials: important design element or unnecessary expense?

Authors:  Lori E Dodd; Edward L Korn; Boris Freidlin; C Carl Jaffe; Lawrence V Rubinstein; Janet Dancey; Margaret M Mooney
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-08-01       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Sensitivity of the discrete-time Kaplan-Meier estimate to nonignorable censoring: Application in a clinical trial.

Authors:  Tao Liu; Daniel F Heitjan
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2012-07-16       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Sensitivity analysis of informatively coarsened data using pattern mixture models.

Authors:  Michelle Shardell; Samer S El-Kamary
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 1.051

6.  ANALYSIS OF DEPENDENTLY CENSORED DATA BASED ON QUANTILE REGRESSION.

Authors:  Shuang Ji; Limin Peng; Ruosha Li; Michael J Lynn
Journal:  Stat Sin       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 1.261

7.  A semiparametric censoring bias model for estimating the cumulative risk of a false-positive screening test under dependent censoring.

Authors:  Rebecca A Hubbard; Diana L Miglioretti
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2013-02-05       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Are all biases missing data problems?

Authors:  Chanelle J Howe; Lauren E Cain; Joseph W Hogan
Journal:  Curr Epidemiol Rep       Date:  2015-07-12

9.  The need for double-sampling designs in survival studies: an application to monitor PEPFAR.

Authors:  Ming-Wen An; Constantine E Frangakis; Beverly S Musick; Constantin T Yiannoutsos
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2008-05-13       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 10.  Statistical issues and methods in designing and analyzing survival studies.

Authors:  Muditha Perera; Alok Kumar Dwivedi
Journal:  Cancer Rep (Hoboken)       Date:  2019-05-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.