Literature DB >> 22223569

The glycemic response does not reflect the in vivo starch digestibility of fiber-rich wheat products in healthy men.

Coby Eelderink1, Tanja C W Moerdijk-Poortvliet, Hongwei Wang, Marianne Schepers, Tom Preston, Theo Boer, Roel J Vonk, Henk Schierbeek, Marion G Priebe.   

Abstract

Starchy food products differ in the rate of starch digestion, which can affect their metabolic impact. In this study, we examined how the in vivo starch digestibility is reflected by the glycemic response, because this response is often used to predict starch digestibility. Ten healthy male volunteers [age 21 ± 0.5 y, BMI 23 ± 0.6 kg/m² (mean ± SEM)] participated in a cross-over study, receiving three different meals: pasta with normal wheat bran (PA) and bread with normal (CB) or purple wheat bran (PBB). Purple wheat bran was added in an attempt to decrease the rate of starch digestion. The meals were enriched in ¹³C and the dual isotope technique was applied to calculate the rate of appearance of exogenous glucose (RaE). The ¹³C-isotopic enrichment of glucose in plasma was measured with GC/combustion/isotope ratio MS (IRMS) and liquid chromatography/IRMS. Both IRMS techniques gave similar results. Plasma glucose concentrations [2-h incremental AUC (iAUC)] did not differ between the test meals. The RaE was similar after consumption of CB and PBB, showing that purple wheat bran in bread does not affect in vivo starch digestibility. However, the iAUC of RaE after men consumed PA was less than after they consumed CB (P < 0.0001) despite the similar glucose response. To conclude, the glycemic response does not always reflect the in vivo starch digestibility. This could have implications for intervention studies in which the glycemic response is used to characterize test products.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22223569     DOI: 10.3945/jn.111.147884

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nutr        ISSN: 0022-3166            Impact factor:   4.798


  14 in total

1.  A Snack Formulated with Ingredients to Slow Carbohydrate Digestion and Absorption Reduces the Glycemic Response in Humans: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Candida J Rebello; William D Johnson; Yang Pan; Sandra Larrivee; Dachuan Zhang; Mark Nisbet; Jodee Johnson; YiFang Chu; Frank L Greenway
Journal:  J Med Food       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 2.786

2.  A novel natural tracer method to measure complex carbohydrate metabolism.

Authors:  Rita Basu; Michele Schiavon; Xuan-Mai Petterson; Ling Hinshaw; Michael Slama; Rickey Carter; Chiara Dalla Man; Claudio Cobelli; Ananda Basu
Journal:  Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 4.310

3.  In vitro digestion of starches in a dynamic gastrointestinal model: an innovative study to optimize dietary management of patients with hepatic glycogen storage diseases.

Authors:  Tatiéle Nalin; Koen Venema; David A Weinstein; Carolina F M de Souza; Ingrid D S Perry; Mario T R van Wandelen; Margreet van Rijn; G Peter A Smit; Ida V D Schwartz; Terry G J Derks
Journal:  J Inherit Metab Dis       Date:  2014-09-16       Impact factor: 4.982

4.  Plasma glucose kinetics and response of insulin and GIP following a cereal breakfast in female subjects: effect of starch digestibility.

Authors:  F Péronnet; A Meynier; V Sauvinet; S Normand; E Bourdon; D Mignault; D H St-Pierre; M Laville; R Rabasa-Lhoret; S Vinoy
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 4.016

5.  Effects of unfermented and fermented whole grain rye crisp breads served as part of a standardized breakfast, on appetite and postprandial glucose and insulin responses: a randomized cross-over trial.

Authors:  Daniel P Johansson; Isabella Lee; Ulf Risérus; Maud Langton; Rikard Landberg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Slow-release carbohydrates: growing evidence on metabolic responses and public health interest. Summary of the symposium held at the 12th European Nutrition Conference (FENS 2015).

Authors:  Sophie Vinoy; Martine Laville; Edith J M Feskens
Journal:  Food Nutr Res       Date:  2016-07-04       Impact factor: 3.894

7.  Optimal nutrition and the ever-changing dietary landscape: a conference report.

Authors:  A Shao; A Drewnowski; D C Willcox; L Krämer; C Lausted; M Eggersdorfer; J Mathers; J D Bell; R K Randolph; R Witkamp; J C Griffiths
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 5.614

8.  The Effect of a Breakfast Rich in Slowly Digestible Starch on Glucose Metabolism: A Statistical Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Sophie Vinoy; Alexandra Meynier; Aurélie Goux; Nathalie Jourdan-Salloum; Sylvie Normand; Rémi Rabasa-Lhoret; Olivier Brack; Julie-Anne Nazare; François Péronnet; Martine Laville
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 5.717

9.  Difference in postprandial GLP-1 response despite similar glucose kinetics after consumption of wheat breads with different particle size in healthy men.

Authors:  Coby Eelderink; Martijn W J Noort; Nesli Sozer; Martijn Koehorst; Jens J Holst; Carolyn F Deacon; Jens F Rehfeld; Kaisa Poutanen; Roel J Vonk; Lizette Oudhuis; Marion G Priebe
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2016-02-08       Impact factor: 5.614

10.  Diet and glycaemia: the markers and their meaning. A report of the Unilever Nutrition Workshop.

Authors:  Marjan Alssema; Hanny M Boers; Antonio Ceriello; Eric S Kilpatrick; David J Mela; Marion G Priebe; Patrick Schrauwen; Bruce H Wolffenbuttel; Andreas F H Pfeiffer
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 3.718

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.