UNLABELLED: Study Type - Prognosis (case series) Level of Evidence 4 What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? Sarcomatoid renal cell carcinoma can occur in the setting of all histological subtypes of kidney cancer. These tumours are very aggressive and many patients present with disseminated disease. Long-term survival is poor and the durable responses to systemic therapy are infrequent. Our large cohort analyses the influence of pathological tumour characteristics in determining prognosis for patients with sarcomatoid renal cell carcinoma undergoing surgical resection. This series helps define the prognostic influence of histological subtype, type of sarcomatoid morphology, the percentage necrosis and sarcomatoid features, and the presence of microvascular invasion. OBJECTIVES: To examine the influence of pathological tumour characteristics on survival to aid prognostication and clinical trial design. Patients with sarcomatoid renal cell carcinoma (sRCC) are known to have poor prognosis and response to systemic therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A single-centre database was reviewed to identify all patients with sRCC. Clinical variables and pathological information, including histology, necrosis, percentage of sarcomatoid features (PSF) and microvascular invasion (MVI), were recorded and correlated to outcome. RESULTS: Analyses of 104 patients with sRCC found that the median (range) size of tumours was 9.5 cm (2.5-30), 65% of patients had areas of clear cell histology, and 69.2% had metastatic disease at presentation. The PSF did not influence tumour size, stage, necrosis, MVI, nodes or metastasis. A total of 85 patients (81.7%) died during the follow-up period with a median (95% confidence interval [CI]) survival of 5.9 months (4.7-8.9). In the overall cohort, Eastern Cooperative Group performance status (ECOGPS), tumour size and metastatic disease were independent predictors of poor survival. MVI, PSF and percentage necrosis were strongly associated with outcome but were not independent predictors of outcome. A multivariate risk model was established that incorporated six covariates (tumour size, MVI, ECOGPS, PSF, necrosis, and metastatic disease) to produce a predictive tool. CONCLUSIONS: Both patients with localized and metastatic sRCC have very poor survival outcomes. Pathological features MVI, PSF and necrosis are important predictors of survival and could be used in a prognostic model while grade and histology do not influence prognosis. A prognostic model, if validated, could aid in patient counselling and/or clinical trial design.
UNLABELLED: Study Type - Prognosis (case series) Level of Evidence 4 What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? Sarcomatoid renal cell carcinoma can occur in the setting of all histological subtypes of kidney cancer. These tumours are very aggressive and many patients present with disseminated disease. Long-term survival is poor and the durable responses to systemic therapy are infrequent. Our large cohort analyses the influence of pathological tumour characteristics in determining prognosis for patients with sarcomatoid renal cell carcinoma undergoing surgical resection. This series helps define the prognostic influence of histological subtype, type of sarcomatoid morphology, the percentage necrosis and sarcomatoid features, and the presence of microvascular invasion. OBJECTIVES: To examine the influence of pathological tumour characteristics on survival to aid prognostication and clinical trial design. Patients with sarcomatoid renal cell carcinoma (sRCC) are known to have poor prognosis and response to systemic therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A single-centre database was reviewed to identify all patients with sRCC. Clinical variables and pathological information, including histology, necrosis, percentage of sarcomatoid features (PSF) and microvascular invasion (MVI), were recorded and correlated to outcome. RESULTS: Analyses of 104 patients with sRCC found that the median (range) size of tumours was 9.5 cm (2.5-30), 65% of patients had areas of clear cell histology, and 69.2% had metastatic disease at presentation. The PSF did not influence tumour size, stage, necrosis, MVI, nodes or metastasis. A total of 85 patients (81.7%) died during the follow-up period with a median (95% confidence interval [CI]) survival of 5.9 months (4.7-8.9). In the overall cohort, Eastern Cooperative Group performance status (ECOGPS), tumour size and metastatic disease were independent predictors of poor survival. MVI, PSF and percentage necrosis were strongly associated with outcome but were not independent predictors of outcome. A multivariate risk model was established that incorporated six covariates (tumour size, MVI, ECOGPS, PSF, necrosis, and metastatic disease) to produce a predictive tool. CONCLUSIONS: Both patients with localized and metastatic sRCC have very poor survival outcomes. Pathological features MVI, PSF and necrosis are important predictors of survival and could be used in a prognostic model while grade and histology do not influence prognosis. A prognostic model, if validated, could aid in patient counselling and/or clinical trial design.
Authors: Brian Shuch; Jonathan Said; Jeff C La Rochelle; Ying Zhou; Gang Li; Tobias Klatte; Fairooz F Kabbinaavar; Allan J Pantuck; Arie S Belldegrun Journal: J Urol Date: 2009-09-16 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Badar M Mian; Nishin Bhadkamkar; Joel W Slaton; Peter W T Pisters; Danai Daliani; David A Swanson; Louis L Pisters Journal: J Urol Date: 2002-01 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: M de Peralta-Venturina; H Moch; M Amin; P Tamboli; S Hailemariam; M Mihatsch; J Javidan; H Stricker; J Y Ro; M B Amin Journal: Am J Surg Pathol Date: 2001-03 Impact factor: 6.394
Authors: Satish K Tickoo; Darym Alden; Semra Olgac; Samson W Fine; Paul Russo; Gnanamba V Kondagunta; Robert J Motzer; Victor E Reuter Journal: J Urol Date: 2007-04 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Brian Shuch; Allan J Pantuck; Frederic Pouliot; David S Finley; Jonathan W Said; Arie S Belldegrun; Chris Saigal Journal: BJU Int Date: 2010-11-19 Impact factor: 5.588
Authors: G Kovacs; M Akhtar; B J Beckwith; P Bugert; C S Cooper; B Delahunt; J N Eble; S Fleming; B Ljungberg; L J Medeiros; H Moch; V E Reuter; E Ritz; G Roos; D Schmidt; J R Srigley; S Störkel; E van den Berg; B Zbar Journal: J Pathol Date: 1997-10 Impact factor: 7.996
Authors: Daniel Y C Heng; Wanling Xie; Meredith M Regan; Mark A Warren; Ali Reza Golshayan; Chakshu Sahi; Bernhard J Eigl; J Dean Ruether; Tina Cheng; Scott North; Peter Venner; Jennifer J Knox; Kim N Chi; Christian Kollmannsberger; David F McDermott; William K Oh; Michael B Atkins; Ronald M Bukowski; Brian I Rini; Toni K Choueiri Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-10-13 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Daniel M Tennenbaum; Brandon J Manley; Emily Zabor; Maria F Becerra; Maria I Carlo; Jozefina Casuscelli; Almedina Redzematovic; Nabeela Khan; Maria E Arcila; Martin H Voss; Darren R Feldman; Robert J Motzer; Nicole E Benfante; Jonathan A Coleman; Paul Russo; James J Hsieh; Abraham Ari Hakimi Journal: Urol Oncol Date: 2017-04-10 Impact factor: 3.498
Authors: Cedric Lebacle; Aydin Pooli; Thomas Bessede; Jacques Irani; Allan J Pantuck; Alexandra Drakaki Journal: World J Urol Date: 2018-06-01 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Vincent Trudeau; Alessandro Larcher; Maxine Sun; Katharina Boehm; Paolo Dell'Oglio; José Sosa; Zhe Tian; Nicola Fossati; Alberto Briganti; Shahrokh F Shariat; Pierre I Karakiewicz Journal: World J Urol Date: 2016-02-22 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: M H Voss; D A Bastos; C A Karlo; A Ajeti; A A Hakimi; D R Feldman; J J Hsieh; A M Molina; S Patil; R J Motzer Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2014-01-23 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Mehrad Adibi; Arun Z Thomas; Leonardo D Borregales; Megan M Merrill; Rebecca S Slack; Hsiang-Chun Chen; Kanishka Sircar; Paari Murugan; Pheroze Tamboli; Eric Jonasch; Nizar M Tannir; Surena F Matin; Christopher G Wood; Jose A Karam Journal: Urol Oncol Date: 2015-05-23 Impact factor: 3.498
Authors: Daniel P Nguyen; Antoni Vilaseca; Emily A Vertosick; Renato B Corradi; Karim A Touijer; Nicole E Benfante; Daniel D Sjoberg; Paul Russo Journal: World J Urol Date: 2015-07-28 Impact factor: 4.226