Literature DB >> 22220955

A new justification for pediatric research without the potential for clinical benefit.

David Wendler1.   

Abstract

Pediatric research without the potential for clinical benefit is vital to improving pediatric medical care. This research also raises ethical concern and is regarded by courts and commentators as unethical. While at least 10 justifications have been proposed in response, all have fundamental limitations. This article describes and defends a new justification based on the fact that enrollment in clinical research offers children the opportunity to contribute to a valuable project. Contributing as children to valuable projects can benefit individuals in two ways. First, individuals may come to "embrace" the contributions they made as children. Second, contributing to valuable projects can lead to a better overall life. Because these potential benefits can outweigh small research risks, they provide a justification for pediatric research without the potential for clinical benefit, when it poses low risks and has the potential to benefit others in important ways.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22220955     DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2011.634482

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Bioeth        ISSN: 1526-5161            Impact factor:   11.229


  11 in total

1.  Involving children in non-therapeutic research: on the development argument.

Authors:  Linus Broström; Mats Johansson
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2014-02

2.  Minimal Risk in Pediatric Research: A Philosophical Review and Reconsideration.

Authors:  John Rossi; Robert M Nelson
Journal:  Account Res       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 2.622

3.  Defining the Boundaries of a Right to Adequate Protection: A New Lens on Pediatric Research Ethics.

Authors:  David DeGrazia; Michelle Groman; Lisa M Lee
Journal:  J Med Philos       Date:  2017-04-01

4.  Body matters: rethinking the ethical acceptability of non-beneficial clinical research with children.

Authors:  Eva De Clercq; Domnita Oana Badarau; Katharina M Ruhe; Tenzin Wangmo
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2015-08

Review 5.  Ethics of pharmacological research involving adolescents.

Authors:  Eva Welisch; Luis A Altamirano-Diaz
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 3.022

6.  Does phase 1 trial enrollment preclude quality end-of-life care? Phase 1 trial enrollment and end-of-life care characteristics in children with cancer.

Authors:  Deena R Levine; Liza-Marie Johnson; Belinda N Mandrell; Jie Yang; Nancy K West; Pamela S Hinds; Justin N Baker
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2014-12-29       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Indirect Benefits in HIV Cure Clinical Research: A Qualitative Analysis.

Authors:  Adam Gilbertson; Elizabeth Poole Kelly; Stuart Rennie; Gail Henderson; JoAnn Kuruc; Joseph D Tucker
Journal:  AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 2.205

8.  Informed consent in paediatric critical care research--a South African perspective.

Authors:  Brenda M Morrow; Andrew C Argent; Sharon Kling
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 2.652

9.  Parental and staff perspectives of NICU research procedures.

Authors:  Christina Freibott; Ursula Guillen; Amy Mackley; Robert Locke
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 2.125

10.  Non-beneficial pediatric research: individual and social interests.

Authors:  Jan Piasecki; Marcin Waligora; Vilius Dranseika
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2015-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.