Literature DB >> 22220029

4-Chloro-6,7-dimeth-oxy-quinoline.

Min Wu1.   

Abstract

The title mol-ecule, C(11)H(10)ClNO(2), is almost planar with the C atoms of the meth-oxy groups deviating by -0.082 (2) and 0.020 (2) Å from the least-squares plane defined by the atoms of the quinoline ring system (r.m.s. deviation = 0.002 Å). An intra-molecular C-H⋯Cl inter-action generates an S(5) ring motif.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 22220029      PMCID: PMC3247411          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811042589

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For related structures, see: Davies & Bond (2001 ▶); Yathirajan et al. (2007 ▶). For biological properties of quinoline derivatives, see: Franck et al. (2004 ▶); Moret et al. (2006 ▶); Furuta et al. (2006 ▶); Ilovich et al. (2008 ▶). For hydrogen-bond motifs, see: Bernstein et al. (1995 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C11H10ClNO2 M = 223.65 Monoclinic, a = 12.5530 (17) Å b = 4.6499 (7) Å c = 18.274 (3) Å β = 105.786 (2)° V = 1026.4 (3) Å3 Z = 4 Mo Kα radiation μ = 0.35 mm−1 T = 296 K 0.3 × 0.2 × 0.2 mm

Data collection

Rigaku SCXmini diffractometer 6840 measured reflections 1808 independent reflections 1542 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.034 3 standard reflections every 150 reflections intensity decay: none

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.037 wR(F 2) = 0.115 S = 1.08 1808 reflections 139 parameters 1 restraint H-atom parameters constrained Δρmax = 0.29 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.22 e Å−3 Data collection: CrystalClear (Rigaku, 2005 ▶); cell refinement: CrystalClear; data reduction: CrystalClear; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL. Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811042589/lr2029sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811042589/lr2029Isup3.hkl Supplementary material file. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811042589/lr2029Isup3.cml Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C11H10ClNO2F(000) = 464
Mr = 223.65Dx = 1.447 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 12.5530 (17) ÅCell parameters from 30 reflections
b = 4.6499 (7) Åθ = 3–25°
c = 18.274 (3) ŵ = 0.35 mm1
β = 105.786 (2)°T = 296 K
V = 1026.4 (3) Å3Block, pink
Z = 40.3 × 0.2 × 0.2 mm
Rigaku SCXmini diffractometerRint = 0.034
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tubeθmax = 25.0°, θmin = 1.7°
graphiteh = −14→14
ω scansk = −5→5
6840 measured reflectionsl = −21→21
1808 independent reflections3 standard reflections every 150 reflections
1542 reflections with I > 2σ(I) intensity decay: none
Refinement on F2Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.037H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F2) = 0.115w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0662P)2 + 0.1562P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.08(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
1808 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.29 e Å3
139 parametersΔρmin = −0.22 e Å3
1 restraintExtinction correction: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methodsExtinction coefficient: 0.029 (4)
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
C10.18445 (16)0.9064 (4)0.34245 (10)0.0508 (5)
C20.23248 (18)0.7745 (5)0.40978 (11)0.0608 (5)
H20.20710.80770.45230.073*
C30.32020 (19)0.5895 (5)0.41333 (12)0.0668 (6)
H30.35220.49990.45960.080*
C40.31375 (16)0.6656 (4)0.28823 (10)0.0486 (5)
C50.35750 (15)0.6077 (4)0.22615 (11)0.0503 (5)
H50.41730.48320.23260.060*
C60.31298 (14)0.7325 (4)0.15691 (10)0.0469 (4)
C70.22217 (14)0.9277 (4)0.14727 (9)0.0443 (4)
C80.17947 (14)0.9890 (4)0.20641 (9)0.0441 (4)
H80.12081.11730.19970.053*
C90.22416 (14)0.8581 (3)0.27829 (9)0.0437 (4)
C100.43422 (17)0.4878 (5)0.09810 (13)0.0659 (6)
H10A0.49970.55630.13440.099*
H10B0.44820.47030.04920.099*
H10C0.41420.30330.11390.099*
C110.09705 (17)1.2379 (5)0.06201 (12)0.0580 (5)
H11A0.03391.14990.07290.087*
H11B0.07801.29720.00970.087*
H11C0.11951.40250.09420.087*
Cl10.07193 (4)1.13418 (12)0.33477 (3)0.0656 (3)
N10.36194 (14)0.5307 (4)0.35576 (9)0.0623 (5)
O10.34547 (11)0.6869 (3)0.09331 (7)0.0585 (4)
O20.18526 (11)1.0371 (3)0.07552 (7)0.0561 (4)
U11U22U33U12U13U23
C10.0588 (11)0.0528 (10)0.0423 (10)−0.0142 (9)0.0164 (8)−0.0043 (8)
C20.0742 (13)0.0699 (12)0.0404 (11)−0.0112 (10)0.0193 (10)0.0013 (9)
C30.0824 (14)0.0736 (13)0.0398 (11)−0.0076 (11)0.0088 (10)0.0115 (10)
C40.0543 (10)0.0463 (10)0.0428 (10)−0.0079 (8)0.0094 (8)0.0014 (8)
C50.0505 (10)0.0487 (10)0.0506 (11)0.0030 (8)0.0120 (8)0.0001 (8)
C60.0498 (10)0.0491 (9)0.0438 (10)−0.0047 (8)0.0162 (8)−0.0054 (8)
C70.0504 (10)0.0460 (9)0.0363 (9)−0.0045 (7)0.0114 (7)−0.0014 (7)
C80.0467 (9)0.0452 (9)0.0405 (9)−0.0029 (7)0.0121 (7)−0.0012 (7)
C90.0487 (9)0.0445 (9)0.0381 (9)−0.0113 (7)0.0123 (7)−0.0036 (7)
C100.0635 (12)0.0696 (13)0.0717 (14)0.0061 (11)0.0303 (10)−0.0091 (11)
C110.0643 (12)0.0611 (11)0.0474 (11)0.0071 (10)0.0134 (9)0.0054 (9)
Cl10.0735 (4)0.0778 (4)0.0532 (4)0.0040 (3)0.0302 (3)−0.0051 (2)
N10.0685 (11)0.0630 (10)0.0506 (10)−0.0002 (8)0.0083 (8)0.0112 (8)
O10.0633 (8)0.0695 (9)0.0478 (8)0.0123 (7)0.0239 (6)−0.0024 (6)
O20.0675 (8)0.0654 (8)0.0380 (7)0.0129 (7)0.0188 (6)0.0068 (6)
C1—C21.360 (3)C6—C71.430 (3)
C1—C91.411 (3)C7—C81.361 (2)
C1—Cl11.740 (2)C7—O21.365 (2)
C2—C31.385 (3)C8—C91.418 (2)
C2—H20.9300C8—H80.9300
C3—N11.325 (3)C10—O11.433 (2)
C3—H30.9300C10—H10A0.9600
C4—N11.370 (2)C10—H10B0.9600
C4—C91.410 (3)C10—H10C0.9600
C4—C51.414 (3)C11—O21.418 (2)
C5—C61.366 (3)C11—H11A0.9600
C5—H50.9300C11—H11B0.9600
C6—O11.349 (2)C11—H11C0.9600
C2—C1—C9120.67 (19)C7—C8—C9120.25 (17)
C2—C1—Cl1119.85 (16)C7—C8—H8119.9
C9—C1—Cl1119.48 (14)C9—C8—H8119.9
C1—C2—C3118.27 (19)C4—C9—C1116.33 (16)
C1—C2—H2120.9C4—C9—C8119.53 (16)
C3—C2—H2120.9C1—C9—C8124.14 (17)
N1—C3—C2124.90 (18)O1—C10—H10A109.5
N1—C3—H3117.6O1—C10—H10B109.5
C2—C3—H3117.6H10A—C10—H10B109.5
N1—C4—C9123.24 (18)O1—C10—H10C109.5
N1—C4—C5117.57 (17)H10A—C10—H10C109.5
C9—C4—C5119.19 (16)H10B—C10—H10C109.5
C6—C5—C4120.80 (17)O2—C11—H11A109.5
C6—C5—H5119.6O2—C11—H11B109.5
C4—C5—H5119.6H11A—C11—H11B109.5
O1—C6—C5126.01 (17)O2—C11—H11C109.5
O1—C6—C7114.29 (15)H11A—C11—H11C109.5
C5—C6—C7119.69 (17)H11B—C11—H11C109.5
C8—C7—O2125.52 (16)C3—N1—C4116.59 (18)
C8—C7—C6120.54 (15)C6—O1—C10117.47 (15)
O2—C7—C6113.94 (15)C7—O2—C11117.24 (14)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
C8—H8···Cl10.932.703.0827 (17)105
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯AD—HH⋯ADAD—H⋯A
C8—H8⋯Cl10.932.703.0827 (17)105
  5 in total

1.  Biological evaluation of substituted quinolines.

Authors:  Xavier Franck; Alain Fournet; Eric Prina; Renaud Mahieux; Reynald Hocquemiller; Bruno Figadère
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem Lett       Date:  2004-07-16       Impact factor: 2.823

2.  Identification of potent and selective inhibitors of PDGF receptor autophosphorylation.

Authors:  Takayuki Furuta; Teruyuki Sakai; Terufumi Senga; Tatsushi Osawa; Kazuo Kubo; Toshiyuki Shimizu; Rika Suzuki; Tetsuya Yoshino; Megumi Endo; Atsushi Miwa
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2006-04-06       Impact factor: 7.446

3.  Formation of fluorine-18 labeled diaryl ureas--labeled VEGFR-2/PDGFR dual inhibitors as molecular imaging agents for angiogenesis.

Authors:  O Ilovich; O Jacobson; Y Aviv; A Litchi; R Chisin; E Mishani
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem       Date:  2008-02-29       Impact factor: 3.641

4.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

5.  Synthesis and anti-HIV properties of new hydroxyquinoline-polyamine conjugates on cells infected by HIV-1 LAV and HIV-1 BaL viral strains.

Authors:  Vincent Moret; Nathalie Dereudre-Bosquet; Pascal Clayette; Younes Laras; Nicolas Pietrancosta; Amandine Rolland; Clement Weck; Sylvain Marc; Jean-Louis Kraus
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem Lett       Date:  2006-09-26       Impact factor: 2.823

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.