Literature DB >> 22219011

Long-term outcomes of laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in the United States.

Hadar Spivak1, Mena F Abdelmelek, Oscar R Beltran, Amelia W Ng, Seiichi Kitahama.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) are the most common bariatric procedures performed in the past decade, little is known about their long-term (>5 years) outcomes.
METHODS: A retrospective outcome study investigated 148 consecutive patients from a single practice who underwent LAGB from November 2000 to March 2002. The group was matched with 175 consecutive patients who underwent LRYGB from June 2000 to March 2005. Follow-up data for 5 years or longer was available for 127 LAGB patients (86%) and 105 LRYGB patients (60%).
RESULTS: After an initial 4 years of progressive weight loss, body mass index (BMI) loss stabilized at 5-7 years at approximately 15 kg/m(2) for the LRYGB patients and at about 9 kg/m(2) for the LAGB patients with band in place (P < 0.01). At 7 years, the excess weight loss (EWL) was 58.6% for LRYGB and 46.3% for LAGB with band in place (P < 0.01). By 7 years, 19 LAGB patients (15%) had had their bands removed, bringing the failure rate for LAGB (including patients with less than 25% EWL) to 48.3% versus 10.7% for LRYGB (P < 0.01). By 10 years, 29 (22.8%) of the bands had been removed, bringing the total LAGB failure rate to 51.1%. In 10 years, 67 LAGB (52.8%) and 43 LRYGB (41%) adverse events had occurred. However, over time, the LRYGB group experienced 9 (8.6%) serious, potentially life-threatening complications, whereas the LAGB group had none (P < 0.001). One procedure-related death occurred in the LRYGB group.
CONCLUSIONS: Over the long term, LRYGB had an approximate reduction of 15 kg/m(2) BMI and 60% EWL, a significantly better outcome than LAGB patients experienced with band intact. The main issue with LAGB was its 50% failure rate in the long term, as defined by poor weight loss and percentage of band removal. Nevertheless, LAGB had a remarkably safe course, and it may therefore be considered for motivated and informed patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22219011     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-011-2125-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  34 in total

Review 1.  Avoiding postoperative complications with the LAP-BAND system.

Authors:  Hadar Spivak; Franco Favretti
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.565

2.  Laparoscopic gastric banding with Lap-Band for morbid obesity: two-step technique may improve outcome.

Authors:  M Rubin; S Benchetrit; H Lustigman; S Lelcuk; H Spivak
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.129

3.  A prospective randomized trial of laparoscopic gastric bypass versus laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding for the treatment of morbid obesity: outcomes, quality of life, and costs.

Authors:  Ninh T Nguyen; Johnathan A Slone; Xuan-Mai T Nguyen; Jaimee S Hartman; David B Hoyt
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Weight gain after short- and long-limb gastric bypass in patients followed for longer than 10 years.

Authors:  Nicolas V Christou; Didier Look; Lloyd D Maclean
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  A 10-year experience with laparoscopic gastric banding for morbid obesity: high long-term complication and failure rates.

Authors:  M Suter; J M Calmes; A Paroz; V Giusti
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.129

6.  Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass versus laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: five years of follow-up.

Authors:  Camilo Boza; Cristian Gamboa; Diego Awruch; Gustavo Perez; Alex Escalona; Luis Ibañez
Journal:  Surg Obes Relat Dis       Date:  2010-03-06       Impact factor: 4.734

7.  Laparoscopic revision from LAP-BAND to gastric bypass.

Authors:  Hadar Spivak; Oscar R Beltran; Plamen Slavchev; Erik B Wilson
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-03-14       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: 5-year results of a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  Luigi Angrisani; Michele Lorenzo; Vincenzo Borrelli
Journal:  Surg Obes Relat Dis       Date:  2007-02-27       Impact factor: 4.734

9.  Is weight loss more successful after gastric bypass than gastric banding for obese patients?

Authors:  Paul O'Brien
Journal:  Nat Clin Pract Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2009-02-10

10.  Optimization of access-port placement for the lap-band system.

Authors:  Hadar Spivak; David Gold; Carlos Guerrero
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.129

View more
  42 in total

1.  Defining the role of bariatric surgery in polycystic ovarian syndrome patients.

Authors:  Shaveta M Malik; Michael L Traub
Journal:  World J Diabetes       Date:  2012-04-15

2.  Conversion of failed laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is safe as a single-step procedure.

Authors:  M Emous; J Apers; C Hoff; A P van Beek; E Totté
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Laparoscopic revolution in bariatric surgery.

Authors:  Magnus Sundbom
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-11-07       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  The bariatric surgery and weight losing: a meta-analysis in the long- and very long-term effects of laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding, laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy on weight loss in adults.

Authors:  Mahdieh Golzarand; Karamollah Toolabi; Roya Farid
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Air pollution, weight loss and metabolic benefits of bariatric surgery: a potential model for study of metabolic effects of environmental exposures.

Authors:  R Ghosh; W J Gauderman; H Minor; H A Youn; F Lurmann; K R Cromar; L Chatzi; B Belcher; C R Fielding; R McConnell
Journal:  Pediatr Obes       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 4.000

6.  Band removal and conversion to sleeve or bypass: are they equally safe?

Authors:  B Fernando Santos; Jessica B Wallaert; Thadeus L Trus
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Revision Procedures After Failed Adjustable Gastric Banding: Comparison of Efficacy and Safety.

Authors:  Pawan Chansaenroj; Lwin Aung; Wei-Jei Lee; Shu Chun Chen; Jung-Chien Chen; Kong-Han Ser
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 8.  [Conversional and endoscopic procedures following bariatric surgery].

Authors:  R Zorron; C Bothe; T Junghans; J Pratschke; C Benzing; F Krenzien
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 0.955

9.  Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy versus laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity and related comorbidities: a meta-analysis of 21 studies.

Authors:  Yong Zhang; Ju Wang; Wang Ju; Xiangyu Sun; Zhangou Cao; Zhanguo Cao; Xinsheng Xu; Xu Xinsheng; Daquan Liu; Liu Daquan; Xiangyang Xin; Xin Xiangyang; Mingfang Qin
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 4.129

10.  Five-year weight loss experience of outpatients receiving laparoscopic adjustable gastric band surgery.

Authors:  Chris Cobourn; Mary Ann Chapman; Arlene Ali; John Amrhein
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 4.129

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.