Literature DB >> 22218944

Aggregative response in bats: prey abundance versus habitat.

Jörg Müller1, Milenka Mehr, Claus Bässler, M Brock Fenton, Torsten Hothorn, Hans Pretzsch, Hans-Joachim Klemmt, Roland Brandl.   

Abstract

In habitats where prey is either rare or difficult to predict spatiotemporally, such as open habitats, predators must be adapted to react effectively to variations in prey abundance. Open-habitat foraging bats have a wing morphology adapted for covering long distances, possibly use information transfer to locate patches of high prey abundance, and would therefore be expected to show an aggregative response at these patches. Here, we examined the effects of prey abundance on foraging activities of open-habitat foragers in comparison to that of edge-habitat foragers and closed-habitat foragers. Bat activity was estimated by counting foraging calls recorded with bat call recorders (38,371 calls). Prey abundance was estimated concurrently at each site using light and pitfall traps. The habitat was characterized by terrestrial laser scanning. Prey abundance increased with vegetation density. As expected, recordings of open-habitat foragers clearly decreased with increasing vegetation density. The foraging activity of edge- and closed-habitat foragers was not significantly affected by the vegetation density, i.e., these guilds were able to forage from open habitats to habitats with dense vegetation. Only open-habitat foragers displayed a significant and proportional aggregative response to increasing prey abundance. Our results suggest that adaptations for effective and low-cost foraging constrains habitat use and excludes the guild of open-habitat foragers from foraging in habitats with high prey abundance, such as dense forest stands.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22218944     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-011-2247-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  12 in total

Review 1.  Ventilatory responses to changes in temperature in mammals and other vertebrates.

Authors:  J P Mortola; P B Frappell
Journal:  Annu Rev Physiol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 19.318

2.  The nature of predation: prey dependent, ratio dependent or neither?

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 17.712

3.  Analysis of aggregation, a worked example: numbers of ticks on red grouse chicks.

Authors:  D A Elston; R Moss; T Boulinier; C Arrowsmith; X Lambin
Journal:  Parasitology       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 3.234

Review 4.  The numerical response: rate of increase and food limitation in herbivores and predators.

Authors:  Peter Bayliss; David Choquenot
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2002-09-29       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Echolocation signals reflect niche differentiation in five sympatric congeneric bat species.

Authors:  Björn M Siemers; Hans-Ulrich Schnitzler
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-06-10       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 6.  Terrestrial insects along elevation gradients: species and community responses to altitude.

Authors:  Ian D Hodkinson
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2005-08

7.  How to live in colonies: spatial foraging strategies of the black-headed gull.

Authors:  M Gorke; R Brandl
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Geometry for the selfish herd.

Authors:  W D Hamilton
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1971-05       Impact factor: 2.691

9.  Patches of bare ground as a staple commodity for declining ground-foraging insectivorous farmland birds.

Authors:  Michael Schaub; Nicolas Martinez; Aline Tagmann-Ioset; Nadja Weisshaupt; Melanie L Maurer; Thomas S Reichlin; Fitsum Abadi; Niklaus Zbinden; Lukas Jenni; Raphaël Arlettaz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Echolocating bats cry out loud to detect their prey.

Authors:  Annemarie Surlykke; Elisabeth K V Kalko
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-04-30       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  14 in total

1.  Biotic predictors complement models of bat and bird responses to climate and tree diversity in European forests.

Authors:  Luc Barbaro; Eric Allan; Evy Ampoorter; Bastien Castagneyrol; Yohan Charbonnier; Hans De Wandeler; Christian Kerbiriou; Harriet T Milligan; Aude Vialatte; Monique Carnol; Marc Deconchat; Pallieter De Smedt; Hervé Jactel; Julia Koricheva; Isabelle Le Viol; Bart Muys; Michael Scherer-Lorenzen; Kris Verheyen; Fons van der Plas
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-01-16       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Heterogeneity-diversity relationships differ between and within trophic levels in temperate forests.

Authors:  Lea Heidrich; Soyeon Bae; Shaun Levick; Sebastian Seibold; Wolfgang Weisser; Peter Krzystek; Paul Magdon; Thomas Nauss; Peter Schall; Alla Serebryanyk; Stephan Wöllauer; Christian Ammer; Claus Bässler; Inken Doerfler; Markus Fischer; Martin M Gossner; Marco Heurich; Torsten Hothorn; Kirsten Jung; Holger Kreft; Ernst-Detlef Schulze; Nadja Simons; Simon Thorn; Jörg Müller
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 15.460

3.  Bat and bird diversity along independent gradients of latitude and tree composition in European forests.

Authors:  Yohan M Charbonnier; Luc Barbaro; Jean-Yves Barnagaud; Evy Ampoorter; Julien Nezan; Kris Verheyen; Hervé Jactel
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Bat responses to changes in forest composition and prey abundance depend on landscape matrix and stand structure.

Authors:  Jérémy S P Froidevaux; Luc Barbaro; Olivier Vinet; Laurent Larrieu; Yves Bas; Jérôme Molina; François Calatayud; Antoine Brin
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Ground-Vegetation Clutter Affects Phyllostomid Bat Assemblage Structure in Lowland Amazonian Forest.

Authors:  Rodrigo Marciente; Paulo Estefano D Bobrowiec; William E Magnusson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-12       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Spatial patterns of bat diversity overlap with woodpecker abundance.

Authors:  Dorota Kotowska; Marcin Zegarek; Grzegorz Osojca; Andrzej Satory; Tomas Pärt; Michał Żmihorski
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 2.984

7.  Numerical and functional responses of forest bats to a major insect pest in pine plantations.

Authors:  Yohan Charbonnier; Luc Barbaro; Amandine Theillout; Hervé Jactel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-06       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Operator bias in software-aided bat call identification.

Authors:  Georg Fritsch; Alexander Bruckner
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2014-05-30       Impact factor: 2.912

9.  Insectivorous bats respond to vegetation complexity in urban green spaces.

Authors:  Marcela Suarez-Rubio; Christina Ille; Alexander Bruckner
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 2.912

10.  Wing morphology predicts individual niche specialization in Pteronotus mesoamericanus (Mammalia: Chiroptera).

Authors:  Hernani Fernandes Magalhães de Oliveira; Nícholas Ferreira Camargo; David R Hemprich-Bennett; Bernal Rodríguez-Herrera; Stephen J Rossiter; Elizabeth L Clare
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.