Literature DB >> 12396515

The numerical response: rate of increase and food limitation in herbivores and predators.

Peter Bayliss1, David Choquenot.   

Abstract

Two types of numerical response function have evolved since Solomon first introduced the term to generalize features of Lotka-Volterra predator-prey models: (i) the demographic numerical response, which links change in consumer demographic rates to food availability; and (ii) the isocline numerical response, which links consumer abundance per se to food availability. These numerical responses are interchangeable because both recognize negative feedback loops between consumer and food abundance resulting in population regulation. We review how demographic and isocline numerical responses have been used to enhance our understanding of population regulation of kangaroos and possums, and argue that their utility may be increased by explicitly accounting for non-equilibrium dynamics (due to environmental variability and/or biological interactions) and the existence of multiple limiting factors. Interferential numerical response functions may help bridge three major historical dichotomies in population ecology (equilibrium versus non-equilibrium dynamics, extrinsic versus intrinsic regulation and demographic versus isocline numerical responses).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12396515      PMCID: PMC1693022          DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2002.1124

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  1 in total

Review 1.  Population growth rate and its determinants: an overview.

Authors:  Richard M Sibly; Jim Hone
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2002-09-29       Impact factor: 6.237

  1 in total
  6 in total

Review 1.  Population growth rates: issues and an application.

Authors:  H Charles J Godfray; Mark Rees
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2002-09-29       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Aggregative response in bats: prey abundance versus habitat.

Authors:  Jörg Müller; Milenka Mehr; Claus Bässler; M Brock Fenton; Torsten Hothorn; Hans Pretzsch; Hans-Joachim Klemmt; Roland Brandl
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Population-level assessment of risks of pesticides to birds and mammals in the UK.

Authors:  R M Sibly; H R Akçakaya; C J Topping; R J O'Connor
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2005-11-22       Impact factor: 2.823

4.  Demographic, mechanistic and density-dependent determinants of population growth rate: a case study in an avian predator.

Authors:  Jim Hone; Richard M Sibly
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2002-09-29       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  The limits to population density in birds and mammals.

Authors:  Philip A Stephens; Marcus V Vieira; Stephen G Willis; Chris Carbone
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 9.492

6.  Modelling landscape-level numerical responses of predators to prey: the case of cats and rabbits.

Authors:  Jennyffer Cruz; Alistair S Glen; Roger P Pech
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.