| Literature DB >> 22218809 |
Magdalena Wróbel-Kwiatkowska1, Katarzyna Turnau, Katarzyna Góralska, Teresa Anielska, Jan Szopa.
Abstract
Although arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) are known for their positive effect on flax growth, the impact of genetic manipulation in this crop on arbuscular mycorrhiza and plant performance was assessed for the first time. Five types of transgenic flax that were generated to improve fiber quality and resistance to pathogens, through increased levels of either phenylpropanoids (W92.40), glycosyltransferase (GT4, GT5), or PR2 beta-1,3-glucanase (B14) or produce polyhydroxybutyrate (M50), were used. Introduced genetic modifications did not change the degree of mycorrhizal colonization as compared to parent cultivars Linola and Nike. Arbuscules were well developed in each tested transgenic type (except M50). In two lines (W92.40 and B14), a higher abundance of arbuscules was observed when compared to control, untransformed flax plants. However, in some cases (W92.40, GT4, GT5, and B14 Md), the mycorrhizal dependency for biomass production of transgenic plants was slightly lower when compared to the original cultivars. No significant influence of mycorrhiza on the photosynthetic activity of transformed lines was found, but in most cases P concentration in mycorrhizal plants remained higher than in nonmycorrhizal ones. The transformed flax lines meet the demands for better quality of fiber and higher resistance to pathogens, without significantly influencing the interaction with AMF.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22218809 PMCID: PMC3474904 DOI: 10.1007/s00572-011-0427-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mycorrhiza ISSN: 0940-6360 Impact factor: 3.387
List of transgenic plants investigated
| Transgenic line | Origin of gene | Type of gene and gene construct | Method of gene introduction and selection | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| W92.40 |
| CHS, CHI, DFR, triple gene construct, each under 35S promoter |
| Lorenc-Kukuła et al. |
| GT4, GT5 |
| SsGT1 gene under nap promoter |
| Lorenc-Kukuła et al. |
| M50 |
| phbA, phbB, phbC, triple gene construct, phbB and C genes under 35S, phbA under 14-3-3 promoter |
| Wróbel et al. |
| B14 |
| beta-1,3-glucanase gene under 35S promoter |
| Wróbel-Kwiatkowska et al. |
Fig. 1Relative mycorrhizal intensity (M) and relative arbuscule richness (A) in L. usitatissimum; the numbers represent percent values, according to the parameter definitions by Trouvelot et al. (1986); asterisk—GM lines of Linola, double asterisks—GM lines of Nike; bars labeled with the same letter are not significantly different at P < 0.05
Fig. 2Shoot (a) and root (b) dry weight (in grams) of mycorrhizal (M) and nonmycorrhizal (NM) plants; asterick—GM lines of Linola, double asterisks—GM lines of Nike; different letters above columns indicate statistically significant differences (P < 0.05)
Fig. 3Comparison of P (a) and Zn (b) concentration in mycorrhizal (M) and nonmycorrhizal (NM) shoots; asterick—GM lines of Linola, double asterisks—GM lines of Nike; bars labeled with different letters are significantly different at P < 0.05
Fig. 4Comparison of plant performance (PI) between mycorrhizal (M) and nonmycorrhizal (NM) plants—t test; asterisk—GM lines of Linola, double asterisks—GM lines of Nike; bars labeled with different letters are significantly different at P < 0.05