OBJECTIVE: To measure levels of fine particulate matter in the rear passenger area of cars where smoking does and does not take place during typical real-life car journeys. METHODS: Fine particulate matter (PM(2.5)) was used as a marker of secondhand smoke and was measured and logged every minute of each car journey undertaken by smoking and non-smoking study participants. The monitoring instrument was located at breathing zone height in the rear seating area of each car. Participants were asked to carry out their normal driving and smoking behaviours over a 3-day period. RESULTS: 17 subjects (14 smokers) completed a total of 104 journeys (63 smoking journeys). Journeys averaged 27 min (range 5-70 min). PM(2.5) levels averaged 85 and 7.4 μg/m(3) during smoking and non-smoking car journeys, respectively. During smoking journeys, peak PM(2.5) concentrations averaged 385 μg/m(3), with one journey measuring over 880 μg/m(3). PM(2.5) concentrations were strongly linked to rate of smoking (cigarettes per minute). Use of forced ventilation and opening of car windows were very common during smoking journeys, but PM(2.5) concentrations were still found to exceed WHO indoor air quality guidance (25 μg/m(3)) at some point in the measurement period during all smoking journeys. CONCLUSIONS: PM(2.5) concentrations in cars where smoking takes place are high and greatly exceed international indoor air quality guidance values. Children exposed to these levels of fine particulate are likely to suffer ill-health effects. There are increasing numbers of countries legislating against smoking in cars and such measures may be appropriate to prevent the exposure of children to these high levels of secondhand smoke.
OBJECTIVE: To measure levels of fine particulate matter in the rear passenger area of cars where smoking does and does not take place during typical real-life car journeys. METHODS: Fine particulate matter (PM(2.5)) was used as a marker of secondhand smoke and was measured and logged every minute of each car journey undertaken by smoking and non-smoking study participants. The monitoring instrument was located at breathing zone height in the rear seating area of each car. Participants were asked to carry out their normal driving and smoking behaviours over a 3-day period. RESULTS: 17 subjects (14 smokers) completed a total of 104 journeys (63 smoking journeys). Journeys averaged 27 min (range 5-70 min). PM(2.5) levels averaged 85 and 7.4 μg/m(3) during smoking and non-smoking car journeys, respectively. During smoking journeys, peak PM(2.5) concentrations averaged 385 μg/m(3), with one journey measuring over 880 μg/m(3). PM(2.5) concentrations were strongly linked to rate of smoking (cigarettes per minute). Use of forced ventilation and opening of car windows were very common during smoking journeys, but PM(2.5) concentrations were still found to exceed WHO indoor air quality guidance (25 μg/m(3)) at some point in the measurement period during all smoking journeys. CONCLUSIONS: PM(2.5) concentrations in cars where smoking takes place are high and greatly exceed international indoor air quality guidance values. Children exposed to these levels of fine particulate are likely to suffer ill-health effects. There are increasing numbers of countries legislating against smoking in cars and such measures may be appropriate to prevent the exposure of children to these high levels of secondhand smoke.
Authors: Gideon St Helen; Peyton Jacob; Margaret Peng; Delia A Dempsey; S Katharine Hammond; Neal L Benowitz Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2014-11-14 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Annie Montreuil; Michèle Tremblay; Michael Cantinotti; Bernard-Simon Leclerc; Benoit Lasnier; Joanna Cohen; Jennifer McGrath; Jennifer O'Loughlin Journal: Can J Public Health Date: 2015-06-24
Authors: Benjamin T Kopp; Alice Hinton; Rong Lu; Sarah Cooper; Haikady Nagaraja; Mary Ellen Wewers Journal: Acad Pediatr Date: 2018-04-10 Impact factor: 3.107
Authors: Markus Braun; Amelie Langenstein; Doris Klingelhöfer; Nicole Zulauf; Ruth Müller; David A Groneberg Journal: Environ Sci Pollut Res Int Date: 2019-12-09 Impact factor: 4.223
Authors: Catherine Metayer; Luoping Zhang; Joseph L Wiemels; Karen Bartley; Joshua Schiffman; Xiaomei Ma; Melinda C Aldrich; Jeffrey S Chang; Steve Selvin; Cecilia H Fu; Jonathan Ducore; Martyn T Smith; Patricia A Buffler Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2013-07-12 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Ian A Jones; Gideon St Helen; Matthew J Meyers; Delia A Dempsey; Christopher Havel; Peyton Jacob; Amanda Northcross; S Katharine Hammond; Neal L Benowitz Journal: Tob Control Date: 2013-01-24 Impact factor: 7.552
Authors: Fernando Diaz Del Valle; Jonathan K Zakrajsek; Sung-Joon Min; Patricia B Koff; Harold W Bell; Keegan A Kincaid; Daniel N Frank; Vijay Ramakrishnan; Moumita Ghosh; R William Vandivier Journal: Chest Date: 2022-03-07 Impact factor: 10.262