Literature DB >> 31820227

Particulate matter emissions of less harmful-looking super-slim size cigarettes appealing to women: a laser spectrometric analysis of second-hand smoke.

Markus Braun1, Amelie Langenstein2, Doris Klingelhöfer2, Nicole Zulauf2, Ruth Müller2,3, David A Groneberg2.   

Abstract

Slim tobacco products shall appear by their look less harmful. In 2013, the European Union ministers discussed to ban them. However, only a ban on small package sizes was realized. To add more data for exposure risk assessment of slim tobacco products, the particulate matter (PM) amount in second-hand smoke (SHS) of super-slim size cigarettes compared with a king size brand was investigated. PM amount of four super-slim size cigarette types of the brand Couture was analysed in comparison with the king-size reference cigarette. Therefore, SHS was produced in an enclosed space with a volume of 2.88 m3 by an automatic environmental tobacco smoke emitter. PM size fractions PM10, PM2.5 and PM1 were measured in real time using a laser aerosol spectrometer. SHS of Couture Gold contained about 36% and Couture Purple about 28% more PM than the reference cigarette. In contrast, Couture Green emitted about 37% and Couture Silver about 53% less PM than the reference cigarette. Depending on the brand, the PM2.5 mean concentrations increased up to 1538 μg/m3. This exceeds the 24-h mean concentration of at most 25 μg/m3 according to the WHO Air quality guidelines about 62-fold. Smoking in enclosed rooms leads to a massive increase of PM. The PM pollution by slim-size tobacco products are substantial and sometimes higher than by king size tobacco products. Therefore, SHS exposure from slim-size tobacco products is not less harmful to health. Decision makers should take this aspect in consideration.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Environmental tobacco smoke; Particulate matter; Second-hand smoke; Slim-size cigarettes; Super-slim size cigarettes

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31820227     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-019-07032-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  35 in total

1.  From social taboo to "torch of freedom": the marketing of cigarettes to women.

Authors:  A Amos; M Haglund
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 7.552

Review 2.  Air pollution and health.

Authors:  Bert Brunekreef; Stephen T Holgate
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-10-19       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 3.  A review on the human health impact of airborne particulate matter.

Authors:  Ki-Hyun Kim; Ehsanul Kabir; Shamin Kabir
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2014-10-24       Impact factor: 9.621

4.  Maternal fine particulate matter (PM2.5) exposure and adverse birth outcomes: an updated systematic review based on cohort studies.

Authors:  Lei Yuan; Yan Zhang; Yu Gao; Ying Tian
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-03-20       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  Fine particulate matter (PM2.5) enhances allergic sensitization in BALB/c mice.

Authors:  Alejandro R Castañeda; Keith J Bein; Suzette Smiley-Jewell; Kent E Pinkerton
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health A       Date:  2017-05-11

6.  The Virginia Slims identity crisis: an inside look at tobacco industry marketing to women.

Authors:  B A Toll; P M Ling
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 7.552

Review 7.  Women who smoke - A review of the evidence.

Authors:  Colin Mendelsohn
Journal:  Aust Fam Physician       Date:  2011-06

Review 8.  Clearing the air: a review of the effects of particulate matter air pollution on human health.

Authors:  Jonathan O Anderson; Josef G Thundiyil; Andrew Stolbach
Journal:  J Med Toxicol       Date:  2012-06

9.  Atmospheric fine particulate matter and breast cancer mortality: a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Giovanna Tagliabue; Alessandro Borgini; Andrea Tittarelli; Aaron van Donkelaar; Randall V Martin; Martina Bertoldi; Sabrina Fabiano; Anna Maghini; Tiziana Codazzi; Alessandra Scaburri; Imma Favia; Alessandro Cau; Giulio Barigelletti; Roberto Tessandori; Paolo Contiero
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Adolescent perceptions of cigarette appearance.

Authors:  Allison Ford; Crawford Moodie; Anne M MacKintosh; Gerard Hastings
Journal:  Eur J Public Health       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 3.367

View more
  1 in total

1.  High Particulate Matter Burden of Cigarettes from the United Arab Emirates and Germany: Are There Country-Specific Differences?

Authors:  Markus Braun; Rawya Al-Qaysi; Doris Klingelhöfer; Ruth Müller; David A Groneberg
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-04-02       Impact factor: 3.390

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.