Literature DB >> 22217589

Assessment of RF exposures from emerging wireless communication technologies in different environments.

Wout Joseph1, Leen Verloock, Francis Goeminne, Gönter Vermeeren, Luc Martens.   

Abstract

In situ electromagnetic (EM) radio frequency (RF) exposure to base stations of emerging wireless technologies is assessed at 311 locations, 68 indoor and 243 outdoor, spread over 35 areas in three European countries (Belgium, The Netherlands, and Sweden) by performing narrowband spectrum analyzer measurements. The locations are selected to characterize six different environmental categories (rural, residential, urban, suburban, office, and industrial). The maximal total field value was measured in a residential environment and equal to 3.9 V m(-1), mainly due to GSM900 signals. Exposure ratios for maximal electric field values, with respect to ICNIRP reference levels, range from 0.5% (WiMAX) to 9.3% (GSM900) for the 311 measurement locations. Exposure ratios for total field values vary from 3.1% for rural environments to 9.4% for residential environments. Exposures are lognormally distributed and are the lowest in rural environments and the highest in urban environments. Highest median exposures were obtained in urban environments (0.74 V m(-1)), followed by office (0.51 V m(-1)), industrial (0.49 V m(-1)), suburban (0.46 V m(-1)), residential (0.40 V m(-1)), and rural (0.09 V m(-1)) environments. The average contribution to the total electric field is more than 60% for GSM. Except for the rural environment, average contributions of UMTS-HSPA are more than 3%. Contributions of the emerging technologies LTE and WiMAX are on average less than 1%. The dominating outdoor source is GSM900 (95 percentile of 1.9 V m(-1)), indoor DECT dominates (95 percentile of 1.5 V m(-1)).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22217589     DOI: 10.1097/HP.0b013e31822f8e39

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Phys        ISSN: 0017-9078            Impact factor:   1.316


  9 in total

1.  Electromagnetic field exposure assessment in Europe radiofrequency fields (10 MHz-6 GHz).

Authors:  Peter Gajšek; Paolo Ravazzani; Joe Wiart; James Grellier; Theodoros Samaras; György Thuróczy
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 5.563

2.  Exposure assessment of microwave ovens and impact on total exposure in WLANs.

Authors:  David Plets; Leen Verloock; Matthias Van Den Bossche; Emmeric Tanghe; Wout Joseph; Luc Martens
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2015-05-08       Impact factor: 0.972

Review 3.  Radiofrequency electromagnetic field exposure in everyday microenvironments in Europe: A systematic literature review.

Authors:  Sanjay Sagar; Stefan Dongus; Anna Schoeni; Katharina Roser; Marloes Eeftens; Benjamin Struchen; Milena Foerster; Noëmi Meier; Seid Adem; Martin Röösli
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 5.563

4.  Comparative international analysis of radiofrequency exposure surveys of mobile communication radio base stations.

Authors:  Jack T Rowley; Ken H Joyner
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2012-02-29       Impact factor: 5.563

5.  Joint minimization of uplink and downlink whole-body exposure dose in indoor wireless networks.

Authors:  D Plets; W Joseph; K Vanhecke; G Vermeeren; J Wiart; S Aerts; N Varsier; L Martens
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-02-22       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 6.  Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields Exposure Assessment in Indoor Environments: A Review.

Authors:  Emma Chiaramello; Marta Bonato; Serena Fiocchi; Gabriella Tognola; Marta Parazzini; Paolo Ravazzani; Joe Wiart
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-03-17       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Design of an Integrated Platform for Mapping Residential Exposure to Rf-Emf Sources.

Authors:  Corentin Regrain; Julien Caudeville; René de Seze; Mohammed Guedda; Amirreza Chobineh; Philippe de Doncker; Luca Petrillo; Emma Chiaramello; Marta Parazzini; Wout Joseph; Sam Aerts; Anke Huss; Joe Wiart
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-07-24       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  National surveys of radiofrequency field strengths from radio base stations in Africa.

Authors:  Ken H Joyner; Marthinus J Van Wyk; Jack T Rowley
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 0.972

Review 9.  EMF monitoring-concepts, activities, gaps and options.

Authors:  Gregor Dürrenberger; Jürg Fröhlich; Martin Röösli; Mats-Olof Mattsson
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2014-09-11       Impact factor: 3.390

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.