Literature DB >> 22215801

Electrolytes in sick neonates - which sodium is the right answer?

Richard I King1, Richard J Mackay, Christopher M Florkowski, Adrienne M Lynn.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Hypoproteinaemia leads to spuriously high-sodium values when measured by indirect ion-selective electrodes (ISE) as used in main laboratory analysers compared with direct ISE employed in point-of-care analysers (POCT). The authors, therefore, investigated the occurrence of hypoalbuminaemia and its effect on measured sodium from POCT and the main laboratory analyser of neonatal intensive-care samples.
METHOD: Sodium, in paired retrospective samples, measured by the main laboratory and neonatal unit blood-gas (POCT) analysers were compared.
RESULTS: Hypoalbuminaemia (<30 g/l) was present in 1400/2420 paired results. Sodium was higher when measured by laboratory analyser, the difference increased with decreasing albumin; sodium (laboratory - POCT)=7.6 (±1.1)-0.22 (±0.04)×albumin. A difference >3 mmol/l was present in 31% and consequently underestimated (9.4%) hyponatraemia and overestimated (3.8%) hypernatraemia.
CONCLUSION: Hypoalbuminaemia is common in sick neonates and monitoring electrolytes using POCT and laboratory analysers frequently yield significantly different results with consequent misclassification. In these patients, measurement of electrolytes by direct ISE (blood-gas analyser) may be more accurate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22215801     DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2011-300929

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed        ISSN: 1359-2998            Impact factor:   5.747


  7 in total

1.  Sodium monitoring in infants < 100 days of life.

Authors:  Sebastiano A G Lava; Mario G Bianchetti; Carlo Agostoni; Gregorio P Milani
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2019-11-16       Impact factor: 3.183

2.  A comparative study on reliability of point of care sodium and potassium estimation in a pediatric intensive care unit.

Authors:  Viswas Chhapola; Sandeep Kumar Kanwal; Rajni Sharma; Virendra Kumar
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2013-02-08       Impact factor: 1.967

3.  Point of care blood gases with electrolytes and lactates in adult emergencies.

Authors:  Dheeraj Kapoor; Meghana Srivastava; Pritam Singh
Journal:  Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci       Date:  2014-07

4.  Comparison of different methods for measurement of electrolytes in patients admitted to the intensive care unit.

Authors:  Sinan Yilmaz; Hilal B Uysal; Mücahit Avcil; Mustafa Yilmaz; Bekir Dağlı; Murat Bakış; Imran K Ömürlü
Journal:  Saudi Med J       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 1.484

5.  Role of Correction Factor in Minimizing Errors While Calculating Electrolyte Values between Blood-gas Analyzer and Laboratory Autoanalyzer: A Comparative Study.

Authors:  Abhinav Banerjee; Gesu Mehrotra
Journal:  Indian J Crit Care Med       Date:  2018-01

6.  Testing Na+ in blood.

Authors:  Sebastiano A G Lava; Mario G Bianchetti; Gregorio P Milani
Journal:  Clin Kidney J       Date:  2016-10-13

7.  Sodium assessment in neonates, infants, and children: a systematic review.

Authors:  Antonio Corsello; Sabrina Malandrini; Mario G Bianchetti; Carlo Agostoni; Barbara Cantoni; Francesco Meani; Pietro B Faré; Gregorio P Milani
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 3.860

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.