Literature DB >> 22215631

Similarly increased congenital anomaly rates after intrauterine insemination and IVF technologies: a retrospective cohort study.

P Sagot1, S Bechoua, C Ferdynus, A Facy, X Flamm, J B Gouyon, C Jimenez.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: While intrauterine insemination (IUI), a simple, inexpensive and non-invasive technique, is the most used assisted reproduction technology (ART) worldwide, the risk of major birth defects following IUI is paradoxically not well documented.
METHODS: Retrospective cohort study performed in Burgundy, France, over a 9-year period which consisted of the cross analysis of two prospective databases, the Burgundy perinatal network database and the database of the assisted conception units in Burgundy. A total of 1348 ART singletons [in vitro fertilization technologies (IVFT): n= 903; IUI: n= 445] matched with 4044 infants conceived naturally, 552 ART twins (IVFT: n= 362; IUI: n= 190) matched with 1656 twins who were conceived naturally. The major birth defects were categorized according to the European Surveillance of Congenital Anomalies classification EUROCAT.
RESULTS: Compared with naturally conceived singletons, singletons born after IUI and IVFT had a higher prevalence of major congenital malformations, with adjusted odd ratios (AOR) of 2.0 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.0-3.8] and 2.0 (CI 1.3-3.1); 3.6 and 4.2% of infants born, respectively. All twins and unlike-sex twins born after IVFT but not IUI, have an increased prevalence of major birth defects compared with naturally conceived twins; AOR of 3.0 (CI 1.6-5.6) and 3.7 (CI 1.1-16.9), respectively. When comparing IUI with IVFT, no differences were observed for singletons (AOR 1.0; CI 0.4-2.2), all twins (AOR 0.4; CI 0.1-1.2) and unlike-sex twins (AOR 0.3; CI 0.1-4.5).
CONCLUSIONS: The risk of major birth defects in singletons conceived through IUI was increased over naturally conceived singletons. This risk was no different from that observed after IVFT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22215631     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/der443

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  7 in total

1.  No difference in congenital anomalies prevalence irrespective of insemination methods and freezing procedure: cohort study over fourteen years of an ART population in the south of France.

Authors:  Any Beltran Anzola; Vanessa Pauly; Debbie Montjean; Line Meddeb; Cendrine Geoffroy-Siraudin; Roland Sambuc; Pierre Boyer; Marie-José Gervoise-Boyer
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 2.  Neonatal risks from in vitro fertilization and delayed motherhood.

Authors:  Carlo Valerio Bellieni
Journal:  World J Clin Pediatr       Date:  2012-12-08

3.  Impact of assisted reproduction treatments on Spanish newborns: report of 14,119 pregnancies.

Authors:  E Ricciarelli; I Bruna; V Verdú; M J Torrelló; R Herrer; J M Gris; G Arroyo; F Pérez-Millán; F Del Río; M Fernández-Sánchez; Y Cabello; M Ardoy; S Fernández-Shaw
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Which type of congenital malformations is significantly increased in singleton pregnancies following after in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ying Liang; Letao Chen; Hong Yu; Hua Wang; Qi Li; Renhe Yu; Jiabi Qin
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-12-25

5.  Optimal Follow-Up Duration for Assessment of Birth Defects After In Vitro Fertilization-Embryo Transfer: A Multicenter 5-Year Cohort Study in China.

Authors:  Chun-Lin Liu; Ping Li; Gui-Feng Cai; Abraham Morse; Jun Liu; Zhi-Heng Chen; Xiu Zhang; Ling Sun
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 5.555

6.  Congenital malformations and assisted reproductive technique: Where is assisted reproductive technique taking us?

Authors:  Sunita Tandulwadkar; Pooja Lodha; Vineeta Kharb
Journal:  J Hum Reprod Sci       Date:  2012-09

Review 7.  Congenital Malformations in Infants of Mothers Undergoing Assisted Reproductive Technologies: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Study.

Authors:  Hayedeh Hoorsan; Parvin Mirmiran; Shahla Chaichian; Yousef Moradi; Roza Hoorsan; Fatemeh Jesmi
Journal:  J Prev Med Public Health       Date:  2017-11
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.