| Literature DB >> 22215184 |
S-M Xiao1, Y Gao, C-L Cheung, C H Bow, K-S Lau, P C Sham, K C B Tan, A W C Kung.
Abstract
SUMMARY: Periostin (POSTN) as a regulator of osteoblast differentiation and bone formation may affect susceptibility to osteoporosis. This study suggests POSTN as a candidate gene for bone mineral density (BMD) variation and vertebral fracture risk, which could better our understanding about the genetic pathogenesis of osteoporosis and will be useful in clinic in the future.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22215184 PMCID: PMC3368110 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-011-1861-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Osteoporos Int ISSN: 0937-941X Impact factor: 4.507
Basic characteristics of two studied cohorts
| Hong Kong Southern Chinese extreme cohorta | Hong Kong Osteoporosis Study prospective cohortb | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| High BMD group | Low BMD group |
| BMD group | Vertebral fracture | |||
| No fracture group | With fracture group |
| |||||
| Subjects number | 663 | 909 | 2,509 | 1,469 | 277 | ||
| Age (years) | 47.7 (15.46) | 50.5 (16.02) | <0.05 | 63.6 (8.81) | 62.4 (8.31) | 68.0 (9.10) | <0.01 |
| Height (m) | 1.61 (0.08) | 1.55 (0.08) | <0.01 | 1.56 (0.08) | 1.57 (0.08) | 1.54 (0.08) | <0.01 |
| Weight (kg) | 63.59 (10.91) | 50.73 (8.66) | <0.01 | 57.65 (10.12) | 58.04 (10.02) | 56.80 (10.77) | 0.06 |
| BMD (g/cm2) | |||||||
| Lumbar spine | 1.09 (0.13) | 0.74 (0.13) | <0.01 | 0.85 (0.18) | 0.87 (0.18) | 0.80 (0.18) | <0.01 |
| Femoral neck | 0.86 (0.12) | 0.58 (0.09) | <0.01 | 0.65 (0.12) | 0.67 (0.12) | 0.60 (0.13) | <0.01 |
| BMD z-score | |||||||
| Lumbar spine | 1.16 (0.84) | −1.43 (0.68) | <0.01 | −0.24 (1.13) | −0.17 (1.34) | −0.40 (1.25) | <0.05 |
| Femoral neck | 1.10 (0.82) | −1.25 (0.66) | <0.01 | −0.20 (0.98) | −0.11 (0.99) | −0.36 (1.03) | <0.01 |
Data are expressed as mean (SD). The t test was conducted for phenotype comparison between high and low BMD groups for extreme cohort and between groups with and without vertebral fracture for prospective cohort
aThe basic characteristics of the lumbar spine and femoral neck sub-groups of the extreme cohort are detailed in Table S1 (ESM 1)
bA total of 2,509 subjects with BMD data were included in the prospective cohort, and 1,746 of them had the data of vertebral fracture
Association results of eight polymorphic SNPs with BMD variation in the tSNP-based association study (HKSC extreme cohort, n = 1,572)
| SNP | Genomic position | Genic position | Alleles major/minor | MAF | HWE ( | Either LS or FN | LS | FN | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| OR | 95%CI |
| OR | 95%CI |
| OR | 95%CI | ||||||
| rs9547952 | 37036688 | Exon 22 | C/T | 0.075 | 0.747 | >0.1 | 1.08 | 0.74–1.49 | >0.1 | 1.10 | 0.68–1.63 | >0.1 | 1.02 | 0.63–1.66 |
| rs9603226 | 37041585 | Intron 20 | G/A | 0.339 | 0.413 | >0.1 | 0.84 | 0.69–1.03 | >0.1 | 0.92 | 0.71–1.16 | 0.056 | 0.76 | 0.56–1.00 |
| rs7322993 | 37051129 | Intron 14 | C/T | 0.195 | 0.666 | 0.001* | 1.46 | 1.16–1.82 | 0.006* | 1.47 | 1.12–1.93 | 0.029 | 1.45 | 1.03–1.99 |
| rs7323378 | 37051350 | Intron 13 | T/C | 0.113 | 1.000 | >0.1 | 1.02 | 0.77–1.35 | >0.1 | 1.05 | 0.74–1.49 | >0.1 | 0.88 | 0.59–1.33 |
| rs9547965 | 37051887 | Intron 12 | G/A | 0.028 | 0.145 | >0.1 | 0.76 | 0.47–1.28 | >0.1 | 0.91 | 0.50–1.63 | 0.050 | 0.47 | 0.22–1.01 |
| rs17056105 | 37055419 | Intron 9 | A/T | 0.082 | 0.372 | >0.1 | 1.21 | 0.87–1.65 | >0.1 | 1.14 | 0.77–1.67 | >0.1 | 1.28 | 0.79–2.05 |
| rs12871092 | 37057632 | Intron 7 | A/G | 0.353 | 0.858 | >0.1 | 0.90 | 0.76–1.12 | >0.1 | 0.83 | 0.67–1.08 | >0.1 | 1.11 | 0.85–1.46 |
| rs7338244 | 37065052 | Intron 2 | C/G | 0.306 | 1.000 | 0.003* | 1.34 | 1.11–1.63 | 0.015 | 1.33 | 1.08–1.71 | >0.1 | 1.27 | 0.95–1.66 |
Two SNPs remained statistically significant after correction for multiple testing using FDR method. OR >1, the reference (minor) allele is associated with the higher risk of low BMD
B36 Genomic position, MAF minor allele frequency, HWE Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium, LS lumbar spine, FN femoral neck
*P FDR < 0.05
Fig. 1Association results of BMD variation with single SNPs from the imputed genotyping data after the adjustment of age, height, weight, and gender in all of the 1,572 extreme subjects. X-axis the genomic position (B36); Y-axis the −log10 (P value) of association results (left scale) and the fine scale recombination rate (B36, right scale); circle dots genotyped SNPs; square dots untyped SNPs. The colors of dots are coded according to the degree of linkage disequilibrium (r 2) with rs9547970 identified as the most significant SNP in this study (P FDR < 0.05), and this imputed top SNP was then directly genotyped in the 1,572 extreme subjects for validation; rs1977278, the SNP had strongest association with BMD variation in the Framingham Study; rs7322993 and rs7338244, the selected tSNPs showed significant associations with BMD variation after the correction of multiple testing in the tSNP-based analyses (P FDR < 0.05)
Summary of association results of rs9547970 in two studied cohorts
| Either LS or FN BMD | LS BMD | FN BMD | Vertebral fracturea ( | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A1 | A2 | MAF |
| OR (95% CI)/ |
| OR (95% CI)/ |
| OR (95% CI)/ |
| OR (95% CI) | |
| HKSC extreme cohort ( | G | A | 0.265 | 6.8 × 10−4 | 1.41 (1.16–1.73) | 0.007 | 1.38 (1.09–1.76) | 0.019 | 1.42 (1.06–1.91) | NA | NA |
| HKOS prospective cohort ( | G | A | 0.278 | NA | NA | 0.023a | −0.078b | 0.039a | −0.061b | 0.007 | 1.33 (1.08–1.62) |
| Meta-analysisc ( | NA | NA | 0.003 | NA | 0.010 | NA | NA | NA | |||
The top imputation finding, rs9547970, was validated by direct genotyping in the Hong Kong Southern Chinese (HKSC) extreme cohort and was replicated in the Hong Kong Osteoporosis Study (HKOS) prospective cohort. The results were adjusted for age, height, weight, gender, and LS BMD (vertebral fracture only)
A1 Minor/effect allele, A2 major allele, MAF minor allele frequency, OR odds ratio; OR >1 the effect allele is associated with the higher risk of low BMD or vertebral fracture, NA not available
aIn the replication cohort (HKOS prospective cohort), the listed P values of BMD were one-sided, as they have the same direction of effect to the initial analysis in the HKSC extreme cohort. Other P values were all two sided.
bThe effects were presented as regression coefficient (β) estimated using the linear regression model.
cThe meta-analysis was done using a weighted z-transform test
Interactive effects between POSTN and SOST genes on BMD variation by MDR and conditional logistic regression analyses
| Either LS or FN | LS | FN | |
|---|---|---|---|
| SNP of | rs9547970 | rs9547970 | rs9547970 |
| SNP of | rs2301682 | rs9899889 | rs9899889 |
| rs865429 | rs865429 | ||
| rs2301682 | |||
| MDR | |||
| Cross validation consistency | 20/20 | 19/20 | 20/20 |
| Prediction accuracy | 0.57 | 0.57 | 0.56 |
| Sign test | <0.0001 | 0.001 | 0.0087 |
| Conditional logistic regression analysis | |||
|
| 0.001 | 0.002 | 0.002 |
Several output parameters are used to select the best interaction model in MDR. The cross-validation consistency score measures the degree of consistency with which the reported interaction is identified as the most evident model. The testing accuracy score measures the degree to which the interaction accurately predicts case–control status (accuracy score ≥0.55 is suggested as “interesting”). The best model is the one with the maximal cross-validation consistency and minimal prediction error. When cross-validation consistency is higher for one model and prediction error is lower for another model, the model involving the fewest loci/factors is taken as the best. The statistical significance (sign test P value) derived empirically from 1,000 permutations was adjusted for multiple comparisons
Fig. 2Electrophoretic mobility shift and competition assays with nuclear extract of HEK293 cells transfected with pCMV-CDX1 and allelic variants of SNP rs9547970 in POSTN. 1 Labeled G probe + nuclear extract(Cdx1−); 2 labeled A probe + nuclear extract (Cdx1−); 3 labeled G probe; 4 labeled G probe + nuclear extract (Cdx1+); 5 labeled G probe + nuclear extract (Cdx1+) + unlabeled G probe; 6 labeled A probe; 7 labeled A probe + nuclear extract (Cdx1+); 8 labeled A probe + nuclear extract (Cdx1+) + unlabeled A probe. Cdx1−, from untreated HEK293; Cdx1+, from HEK293 transfected with pCMV-CDX1